On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah? I've seen benchmarks with postfix spanking sendmail on
performance, and exim handing it right to postfix.
I've seen benchmarks that say just about anything. Even when
they're not designed to produce a certain
On Apr 14, 2008, at 20:18, Paul Lussier wrote:
Sendmail is still (and probably will be for as long as Eric Allman is
alive/maintaining it) the work-horse of the internet. If I need speed
and throughput, I'd still choose sendmail. If I need massive
scalability, I'll choose sendmail. If I
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 18:23 -0400, Shawn O'Shea wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Coleman Kane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 19:24 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone want to give a presentation on switching from Sendmail to
Postfix?
Why would you ever want to do that?
Primarily: Cleaner, easier configuration. I find
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, Apr 13th 2008 at 08:13 -, quoth Ben Scott:
=On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Anyone want to give a presentation on switching from Sendmail to
=Postfix? I really
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sendmail has a long history of security problems.
I have to point out that the above statement would be equally true
if one wrote Unix instead of Sendmail. (This is not a snide
remark, although it may qualify as subtle.)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sendmail has a long history of security problems.
I have to point out that the above statement would be equally true
if one wrote Unix instead of
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 11:55 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sendmail has a long history of security problems.
the 1st internet worm in 1988 was enabled because of the root access
backdoor written into Sendmail.
If I remember correctly, that back door was only available when
Sendmail was run in debug mode. I seem to remember this because a
friend of mine, Henry no relation Hall, was going to join us for
Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday, Apr 13th 2008 at 08:13 -, quoth Ben Scott:
Why would you ever want to do that? Sendmail has more flexibility.
This has been answered, however, I just wanted to add my .02 drachma:
Just because something has more flexibility is not
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf ... to 5.
I don't know much of anything about Postfix, but I'm guessing that
will impact all
On Saturday, Apr 12th 2008 at 22:53 -, quoth Paul Lussier:
=Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=
= A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
= default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf (or wherever
= main.cf is located on your particular install) to 5.
On Sunday, Apr 13th 2008 at 08:13 -, quoth Ben Scott:
=On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
= default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf ... to 5.
=
= I don't know much of
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf ... to 5.
I don't know much
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone want to give a presentation on switching from Sendmail to
Postfix?
Why would you ever want to do that?
Primarily: Cleaner, easier configuration. I find it costs me more
to learn a new feature in Sendmail than
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:40 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Add this to the end of your sendmail.mc
Anyone know what the postfix fix is?
Yeah. Install sendmail. ;)
Seeya,
Paul
-derek
A more
Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf (or wherever
main.cf is located on your particular install) to 5. Adding (or
changing) the following line in the file should do:
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 22:53 -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A more helpful suggestion is that you may want to set the
default_destination_recipient_limit in /etc/postfix/main.cf (or wherever
main.cf is located on your particular install) to 5. Adding (or
Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Add this to the end of your sendmail.mc
Anyone know what the postfix fix is?
--
Seeya,
Paul
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Add this to the end of your sendmail.mc
Anyone know what the postfix fix is?
Yeah. Install sendmail. ;)
Seeya,
Paul
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member,
On Thursday, Apr 10th 2008 at 13:35 -, quoth Ben Scott:
=On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= I run a list and all the mail to yahoo is backing up. It seems they now
= have a limit of 5 recipients per envelope.
=
= That violates RFC-821, I'm pretty
and as the French say Eez beeg fat accomplishmente.
Extra points for Steven...
It took me until I ran it thru google's language tools to get the joke.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
