On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 15:45, Derek Martin wrote:
> More often than not, said aggravation is, I think, the result of the
> ego of the OP being unwilling to take being corrected/criticized.
I'm more than willing to be corrected/criticized. I don't think it is
fair for someone to extrapolate a genera
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 03:45 PM, Derek Martin wrote:
One thing I've noticed is that any discussion about this sort of
thing
invariably causes more aggravation and uses more bandwidth than the
original
transgression. :-)
More often than not, said aggravation is, I think, the result of t
So, how 'bout them Linux - ain't they sumthin!
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, at 2:16pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've found that taking up extra bandwidth for this sort of conversation
> thread is just as inconsiderate as not following any other general rule.
One thing I've noticed is that any discussion about this sort of thing
invariably causes mo
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:16:20PM -0500, Dana S. Tellier wrote:
> Let's just call it even at this point, shall we, because the whole
> argument is getting rather petty. From my lurking over the past few
> years, I've found that taking up extra bandwidth for this sort of
> conversation threa
> I see the emphasis on "guideline", which means it's recommended, but
> not written in stone. If the rest of the community has a problem
> with my sig, I'll change it. But trying to through netiquette back
> in my face is rather petty, don't you think?
Let's just call it even at this
In a message dated: 07 Mar 2003 13:46:24 EST
Jeff Macdonald said:
>> I don't mean to sound unusually harsh, however, the idea that your
>> personal laziness is more important than being considerate to others
>> in this community I find totally intolerable.
>
>Just because I have 'done' top post
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 11:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 6 Mar 2003, "Jeff" == Jeff Macdonald wrote:
>
> Jeff> Mike, You seem to be a mission.
>
> You know, I've thought and called mike a lot of things over the
> years, but I've never considered him a mission :)
>
:-) Sorry Mike.
<
In a message dated: 07 Mar 2003 10:19:30 EST
Jeff Macdonald said:
>On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 6 Mar 2003, at 4:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > I've done top posting because I'm to lazy ...
>>
>> You can stop there. I see your problem. :-)
>
>Not entirely.
> On 6 Mar 2003, "Jeff" == Jeff Macdonald wrote:
Jeff> Mike, You seem to be a mission.
You know, I've thought and called mike a lot of things over the
years, but I've never considered him a mission :)
Jeff> I've done top posting because I'm to lazy to delete all the
Jeff> text that E
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2003, at 4:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've done top posting because I'm to lazy ...
>
> You can stop there. I see your problem. :-)
Not entirely. Regarding Derek's comments about what tools my wife may
use are way off ma
On 6 Mar 2003, at 4:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've done top posting because I'm to lazy ...
You can stop there. I see your problem. :-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do |
| not represent the views or policy of an
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 15:17, mike ledoux wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please don't top post, it breaks up the flow of conversation.
Mike,
You seem to be a mission. I've done top posting because I'm to lazy to
delete all the text that Evolution places in the message
13 matches
Mail list logo
