Hi,
In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets reorganizations,
several people have expressed the proposal to install a Transifex
instance to replace Damned Lies.
I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
that we will be able to keep current D-L
Hi!
I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not convinced
that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. However if we
get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be positive.
I think the main objective would be to support (a) auto-commit in GNOME
git
The branch 'gnome-2-32' was created pointing to:
bfd75c9... Use silent building if available
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
The branch 'gnome-2-32' was created pointing to:
cc898a1... Use silent building if available
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we decide
anything or ask people to do work on it.
While I can certainly support the idea of of-loading work
Am Freitag, den 15.10.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
every time I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things
that can be simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or
done in a very convoluted way.
Elaborating your exact problems, and discussing them with
I was about to say some thing along these lines, but you summarised it
better than what I would have done. I just want to added that every time
I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things that can be
simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or done in a very
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Freitag, den 15.10.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
every time I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things
that can be simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or
done in a very convoluted
2010/10/15 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we decide
anything or ask people to do work on it.
While I can
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 13:53 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
2010/10/15 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
WOW easy does it. It sounds a bit like we have already made the
decision. This should be discussed thoroughly before we
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw
commits to their VCS (security, noise in the vcs history etc). Whether
translations should
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw
commits to their VCS
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 AM, daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of
El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
GNOME infrastructure.
Agree, how could we shorten that difference? I think this is the
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 13:29 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
GNOME infrastructure.
2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel
16 matches
Mail list logo
