On 8/10/09, William Jon McCann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
> > Two questions:
> >
> > + unless I missed something, Colin's patch is for gnome-panel only.
> > What about "Open With", and all the other places where we display the
> > applications?
>
Il giorno lun, 10/08/2009 alle 17.24 +0200, Christian Rose ha scritto:
> This is an interesting point. Yes, an OpenWithLabel is probably
> actually needed for translation reasons. Another example, using
> Swedish:
>
> "Open with" -> "Öppna med"
>
> but
>
> Wrong: "Öppna med Webbläsaren Epiphany
Christian Rose skrev:
On 8/10/09, William Jon McCann wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
> Two questions:
>
> + unless I missed something, Colin's patch is for gnome-panel only.
> What about "Open With", and all the other places where we displa
В Пнд, 10/08/2009 в 22:43 +0200, Luca Ferretti пишет:
> Il giorno lun, 10/08/2009 alle 17.24 +0200, Christian Rose ha scritto:
>
> > This is an interesting point. Yes, an OpenWithLabel is probably
> > actually needed for translation reasons. Another example, using
> > Swedish:
> >
> > "Open with"
2009/8/11 Alexey Rusakov :
> В Пнд, 10/08/2009 в 22:43 +0200, Luca Ferretti пишет:
>> Il giorno lun, 10/08/2009 alle 17.24 +0200, Christian Rose ha scritto:
>>
>> > This is an interesting point. Yes, an OpenWithLabel is probably
>> > actually needed for translation reasons. Another example, using
>
The menu standards discussion reminded me of something I wish I asked
here a long time ago. Let's consider "Eye of GNOME" / "Image Viewer" as
an example.
"Eye of GNOME" is without a doubt a proper name. When it is translated,
what do maintainers expect: actual translation ("Olho do GNOME") or
tran
William Jon McCann wrote:
> So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
> trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
>
> [...]
>
> What do you think? (please read the blog post before answering)
After further discussion on the XDG mailing list
seems fine... :)
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> William Jon McCann wrote:
>
>> So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
>> trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> What do you think? (please read
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
> Is everybody ok to proceed ?
>
Sounds good to me.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
> - If Name is just the application name, leave it alone
> - If there is no GenericName, leave it alone
> - If Name == GenericName: remove GenericName
> - If Name embeds both the application name and the generic name
> - Add X-FullName
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> William Jon McCann wrote:
>
> > So, in preparation for GNOME Shell and 3.0 a number of us have been
> > trying to address various inconsistencies in how we name applications.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > What do you think? (please read the blog
uot;Rhythmbox" doesn't
> get translated to "Boîte à Rythmes" in French?
The .po file will mention the string origin, and translators know they
don't want to translate application names. (intltool could be patched
to add a "this string is from t
Em Ter, 2009-08-18 às 16:02 +0100, Bastien Nocera escreveu:
>
> Will we get automagic translator comments so that "Rhythmbox" doesn't
> get translated to "Boîte à Rythmes" in French?
>
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intltool/+bug/410972
--
Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle
___
Le jeudi 13 août 2009 à 12:13 -0300, Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle a
écrit :
> The menu standards discussion reminded me of something I wish I asked
> here a long time ago. Let's consider "Eye of GNOME" / "Image Viewer" as
> an example.
>
> "Eye of GNOME" is without a doubt a proper name. When it i
Hallo
2009/8/13 Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle :
> The menu standards discussion reminded me of something I wish I asked
> here a long time ago. Let's consider "Eye of GNOME" / "Image Viewer" as
> an example.
>
> "Eye of GNOME" is without a doubt a proper name. When it is translated,
> what do maint
ke a movie title
i don't agree with name changes, weird application names gives free
software something that regular software does not have, even with
acronyms like the GIMP, VLC and others...
I support an application's actual and real name.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Kenneth Ni
opinion, such names should not be translated, except for
> transliteration depending on the script used.
For Arabic, we tend to translate application names when it makes sense.
For example, transliterating Bug Buddy or Eye of Gnome will give long
ugly meaningless names, while translating it helps
17 matches
Mail list logo
