Le jeudi 27 août 2009, à 15:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
So, in order to come to some conclusion here, I'll give a +1 for
removing the interface tab. (Kinda obvious, since I wrote the patch in
the first place...). I'll be more than happy to work on fixing up the
docs afterwards.
Can
Am Freitag, den 28.08.2009, 16:17 +0200 schrieb Vincent Untz:
Le jeudi 27 août 2009, à 15:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
So, in order to come to some conclusion here, I'll give a +1 for
removing the interface tab. (Kinda obvious, since I wrote the patch in
the first place...). I'll be
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le jeudi 27 août 2009, à 15:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
So, in order to come to some conclusion here, I'll give a +1 for
removing the interface tab. (Kinda obvious, since I wrote the patch in
the first place...).
Le vendredi 28 août 2009, à 18:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Vincent Untzvu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le jeudi 27 août 2009, à 15:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
So, in order to come to some conclusion here, I'll give a +1 for
removing the interface
So, in order to come to some conclusion here, I'll give a +1 for
removing the interface tab. (Kinda obvious, since I wrote the patch in
the first place...). I'll be more than happy to work on fixing up the
docs afterwards.
Can we get some response from my fellow release team members ?
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:23 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
3) Do a search online to see if these options are
used to solve (or work around) real problems. Make
a recommendation for troubleshooting topics to be
written to address any such problems.
I did a quick online search for gnome,
So rereading this thread, I believe I've been unnecessarily
abrasive, and I've injected my personal opinion of these
changes into what should only be a discussion of whether
we should break the UI freeze. I apologize for that.
Let me try this again.
William Jon McCann wrote:
There are a few changes we'd like to make to the control center before
the string freeze. Some of these involve UI changes as well. So,
according to http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven we need
approval.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323323
Il giorno dom, 23/08/2009 alle 08.44 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto:
William Jon McCann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592759
So, how about it? I promise they make the user experience better.
Are you proposing to remove the Windows preferences capplet now? Isn't
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Luca Ferrettielle@libero.it wrote:
Il giorno dom, 23/08/2009 alle 08.44 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto:
William Jon McCann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592759
So, how about it? I promise they make the user experience
В Вск, 23/08/2009 в 10:40 -0400, William Jon McCann пишет:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Luca Ferrettielle@libero.it wrote:
Il giorno dom, 23/08/2009 alle 08.44 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto:
William Jon McCann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592759
Adding descriptions for the benefit of people who don't want
to sift through bugzilla or aren't comfortable reading patches.
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 08:44 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
William Jon McCann wrote:
There are a few changes we'd like to make to the control center before
the string
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The first three are fine by me. The last two are much more
substantive and would require documentation work.
On a personal level, I'm not fond of making window shading
even more difficult to find.
How do you
Il giorno dom, 23/08/2009 alle 10.40 -0400, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
* We should let the demand/market determine whether such a tool is even
desired
William, we are not speaking about a feature like let me change the
theme to show my friends how cool is my pc that anyone expects from a
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:23 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The first three are fine by me. The last two are much more
substantive and would require documentation work.
On a personal level, I'm not fond
Hey,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:23 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The first three are fine by me. The last two are much more
substantive
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:24 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hey,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:23 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Shaun McCancesha...@gnome.org wrote:
I agree that these proprietary applications are going to have to
change their docs. And we will have to change some docs in GNOME too.
Which docs in particular do you think need to be changed? If this is
going to be a
18 matches
Mail list logo
