Michael Catanzaro commented:
BTW: technically core-deps is not core, they're separate sets of elements. We
don't normally put libraries in core, they go in either core-deps (if we don't
want them in the flatpak runtime) or sdk (if we do).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Michael Catanzaro commented:
Thanks everyone! Next week is surely fine.
> I would though request that we are more careful about what libraries we add
> to core. I think it's fine here, but if we have a policy that no core should
> depend on World/ libhandy shouldn't have been added to core
Adrien Plazas commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692311
I agree with Guido: we are moving things a lot and waiting a week that the dust
settles is likely simpler for everybody.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Issue was reopened by Andrea Veri
Issue 148: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692288
Ack, I'll re-open this then, please attach here the export anytime, thanks.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
Alexander Mikhaylenko commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692283
You need to be listed in doap to have write access. While you are listed, I'm
not sure you have the same email here as on source.puri.sm, and maybe you need
Guido Günther commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692276
we're merging a lot of stuff during the next days, so maybe delay this til next
week until all the 1.0 MRs made it in and the dust has settled? It's usually
much quieter
Andrea Veri commented:
Temporarily deleted GNOME/libhandy as we're going to re-import it to avoid the
2 repositories to get out of sync :-)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692255
You're receiving
Alexander Mikhaylenko commented:
@guidog @aplazas can you please do that? ^
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692252
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
Andrea Veri commented:
@exalm, we'd need someone to export the repository from puri.sm using the
procedure outlined at
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/user/project/settings/import_export.html as there
seems to be no way to handle that between instances that are not gitlab.com or
github.com,
Carlos Soriano commented:
Yes, first you can import it using the GitLab import function, to your personal
repository. Then we can move it to /GNOME.
Andrea, is that an issue now that you moved the repo?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
Alexander Mikhaylenko commented:
Is there a way to migrate issues and/or MRs from the old repo? :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692244
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented:
I went ahead and imported the repository on
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libhandy, thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692240
You're receiving this email because of
Issue was closed by Andrea Veri
Issue #148: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Carlos Soriano commented:
We keep progressing on the board side, things are just slow because of its
legal nature too. I would say let's make an exception here without any formal
process/agreement and move it to GNOME/, given that there seems to be community
agreement.
@mcatanzaro I
Andre Klapper commented:
Thanks for the quick reply! :)
> Archived, @aklapper, please handle Bugzilla if you can, thanks!
Done.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/234#note_692235
You're receiving this email
Andrea Veri commented:
Archived, @aklapper, please handle Bugzilla if you can, thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/234#note_692229
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Issue was closed by Andrea Veri
Issue #234: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/234
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/234
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented:
@csoriano, mind confirming we're good to go here?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/148#note_692228
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
19 matches
Mail list logo
