Re: Migration of gnome-shell-list to GNOME Discourse instance

Is discourse.gnome.org instance free of 3rd party components? Lots of Discourse instances are full of incompatibilities with strict CSP and SOP protections. Narcis Garcia El 22/10/20 a les 13:01, Olav Vitters via gnome-shell-list ha escrit: > Dear subscribers, > > Please cc me on replies at ovit

Re: Stopping processes in background

thank you. Actually it's not managed by application but by flatpack. In my case, I solved with: flatpak permission-reset APP_ID Il giorno gio 2 apr 2020 alle ore 16:12 Florian Müllner ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 15:46, Donato Marrazzo via gnome-shell-list > wrote: > > Hi all, >

Re: Stopping processes in background

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 15:46, Donato Marrazzo via gnome-shell-list wrote: Hi all, Gnome Shell notified that a process was working in background. Out of curiosity, I asked to abort the process. Then I noticed that gnome shell continues to stop that process. Small correction: Both the notifi

Re: Removal of abandoned extension

On 06.03.20 16:22, Yuri Konotopov wrote: > I will contact extension uploader and ask him. Thank you very much. > Did you uploaded actual version already? We are currently preparing a new version, so the one "in review" right now is obsolete. Once we have the current version packaged we will

Re: Removal of abandoned extension

06.03.2020 12:55, elbenfre...@denkeninechtzeit.net пишет: Disclaimer: This mail was originally send from "elbenfre...@projecthamster.org", which is not actually subscribed to the list. So I am re sending. - Hi list, Hi as I am a bit unsure where to bring this up, I hope you

Re: Keyboard interaction with notifications on lock screen

Hi Florian, On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:25 +0100, Florian Müllner wrote: > Yes. > > When locked, notifications can only be removed programmatically (via > `org.gtk.Notifications.RemoveNotification()` or > `org.freedesktop.Notifications.CloseNotification()`), not by a user. Cool. Thanks :) Cheers,

Re: Keyboard interaction with notifications on lock screen

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 13:55, Tobias Mueller wrote: I want to ask whether notifications on the lock screen are safe from being discarded by the user. Yes. When locked, notifications can only be removed programmatically (via `org.gtk.Notifications.RemoveNotification()` or `org.freedesk

Re: how to add some log in mutter?

additonal information 1. on my x86 pc, it is Ubuntu18.04, the software version is lower than that on device with fc30 2. with WAYLAND_DEBUG=1, some log as below (create_window,826)#1 (create_dmabuf_buffer,686)dmabuf_fd: 8, stride: 1024, modifier: 0 (create_dmabuf_buffer,687)

Re: how to add some log in mutter?

on my test device, the wayland connection runs smoothly before create a wl_buffer (in weston simple-dmabuf-drm.c zwp_linux_buffer_params_v1_create()). I do get the response from wayland server and bind zwp_linux_dmabuf_v1_interface, and received dmabuf_listener callback in dmabuf_format() for the s

Re: how to add some log in mutter?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:33:03PM +0800, Halley Zhao wrote: > I gave some try; > log shows on my desktop pc, but not on my test device. > I'm curious why dma_buf_bind () isn't triggered on my device; from client > side, I do see wayland server( mutter ) reports the supported color format. > is the

Re: how to add some log in mutter?

I gave some try; log shows on my desktop pc, but not on my test device. I'm curious why dma_buf_bind () isn't triggered on my device; from client side, I do see wayland server( mutter ) reports the supported color format. is there any other place to handle dmabuf interface bind? Jonas Ådahl 于201

Re: how to add some log in mutter?

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:55:42PM +0800, Halley Zhao via gnome-shell-list wrote: > Hi experts: > I want to debug somthing in mutter, the question is how to add log in > mutter? > > the background is: > 1. > on my platform(fc30), weston-simple-dmabuf-drm fail to run, it fails after > call zwp_lin

Re: GNOME Shell Extensions 3.34.0

Doesn't it more depend on the distribution one uses? I mean, when gnome is released it takes a while for Debian to put it in the stable release. And even when using the unstable release, it will take some time. And when finally all packages are there, I personally never had problems. That being

Re: GNOME Shell Extensions 3.34.0

As an extension developer, I don't think it's necessarily fair to burden the GNOME team with building a wrapper API and maintaining backwards compatibility forever. Even if this did come to fruition, it would likely end up too narrow in scope to give extensions the flexibility they enjoy now by

Re: GNOME Shell Extensions 3.34.0

Sadly, from one Gnome version or subversion to another, with each change, the majority of extensions are broken, and  "Florian Müllner",  that includes the ones you wrote. Many people are abandoning Gnome, simply because their favorite extensions no longer work. I have a deep appreciation of

Re: Pixel saver: claim update right

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:21 AM Pellegrino Prevete via gnome-shell-list wrote: > Obviously I can't upload a zip having the same UUID as another person's > extension, so I guess I have to claim ownership first. Done. ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gno

Re: gsettings not taking effect

Maybe related. My shortcuts like (Alt+1 -> Switch to workplace 1) keep changing back to the defaults after I set them in Gnome Tweaks. However the graphical interface says that my shortcuts are still the ones that I have set. I'm on the latest Manjaro distribution. ~ V On 8/22/19 8:30 AM, Patrick

Re: Icon from Icon Theme overrides my own icon

On 03.02.19 21:18, Jay Strict via gnome-shell-list wrote: [...] > So I would suspect that the displayed icon is icon No. 2 > (syncthing-logo-symbolic.svg), but instead the first icon > (syncthing.svg) is incorrectly displayed. > > Why is the icon file name truncated at the "-" character, and ho

Re: HiDPI

Scaling in Windows is also very far away from being perfect. You need to take care across a lot of components > Indeed, what an opportunity! You could be the first to fix it! =), Laughed Maybe playing with fonts and themes could help: https://github.com/af2005/Arc-theme-HiDPI Philip Chimento vi

Re: HiDPI

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 06:29 Donato Marrazzo via gnome-shell-list, < gnome-shell-list@gnome.org> wrote: > There is a problem with HiDPI and fonts rendering. > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/522 > > it looks that nobody is looking at this problem. > Indeed, what an opportunity!

Re: Programming question

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:49 AM rastersoft wrote: > Yes, but the question is: which method should I use to implement the part of > the second argument? How can I specify that the actor being added must fill > in X, but not fill neither expand in Y? It depends. (Helpful, I know) ClutterActor

Re: Programming question

Hi: El 17/9/18 a las 2:32, philip.chime...@gmail.com escribió: On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:22 AM rastersoft > wrote: Hi all: I'm not sure if this is the place to ask this. I created an extension and I receive this message:     Too many arguments to m

Re: Programming question

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:22 AM rastersoft wrote: > Hi all: > > I'm not sure if this is the place to ask this. I created an extension and > I receive this message: > > Too many arguments to method Clutter.Container.add_actor: expected 1, > got 2 > > The line is this one: > this.appsContainer.a

Re: Mutter failing to handle failed mode sets

Hello Jonas, 06.09.2018 16:01, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > Mutter should already handle falling back on plain mode sets if flipping > failed. Not sure if I was quite clear. We do not support flipping at all, and it is the mode set which fails. It looks to me (am I right?) like Mutter does not handle t

Re: Mutter failing to handle failed mode sets

Hi, Mutter should already handle falling back on plain mode sets if flipping failed. I'd suggest opening a issue (on https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/new) with reproduction steps etc. A question however (to answer in the reported issue) is why a subsequent mode flip fixes things if the

Re: GNOME Shell 3.29.92

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:21 AM Florian Müllner wrote: > Tarball releases are provided largely for distributions to build > packages. If you are interested in building GNOME Shell from source, > we would recommend building from version control using the build > script described at: > > https://

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

Hi! On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 19:51 +0200, cedlemo wrote: > @Mattias, > > Thanks for taking the time to answer me. Unfortunatly, it does not > work, > I have this: > > λ › cat ~/.config/environment.d/80-ruby.conf > PATH=/home/cedlemo/.gem/ruby/2.5.0/bin:$PATH Hm, I'm sorry I don't know anything fu

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

tjoen, no it does not change anything. thanks Cédric Le Moigne On 19/06/2018 07:47, tj...@dds.nl wrote: cedlemo schreef op 18-06-2018 18:47: I want to add some personnal directories to the PATH environment variable in order to be able to run my ruby/gtk3 applications via the run command pro

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

@Mattias, Thanks for taking the time to answer me. Unfortunatly, it does not work, I have this: λ › cat ~/.config/environment.d/80-ruby.conf PATH=/home/cedlemo/.gem/ruby/2.5.0/bin:$PATH regards Cédric Le Moigne On 19/06/2018 11:55, mattias.jc.bengts...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! On Mon, 2018-06

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 11:55 +0200, mattias.jc.bengts...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi! > [...] > I'm pretty sure you can just source the > files under ~/.config/environment.d/ from ~/.bashrc though but I > haven't bothered testing it. Yep, this worked fine for me (in ~/.bashrc): for f in ${HOME}/.config/

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

Hi! On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 18:47 +0200, cedlemo wrote: > Hi, > I want to add some personnal directories to the PATH environment > variable in order to be able to run my ruby/gtk3 applications via the > run command prompt (Alt+F2). > I have this in my ~/.profile and my ~/.bashrc: > PATH=/home/cedle

Re: How to extend the PATH environment variable in Gnome Shell on Wayland

cedlemo schreef op 18-06-2018 18:47: I want to add some personnal directories to the PATH environment variable in order to be able to run my ruby/gtk3 applications via the run command prompt (Alt+F2). I have this in my ~/.profile and my ~/.bashrc: PATH=/home/cedlemo/.gem/ruby/2.5.0/bin:$PATH it

Re: Gnome 3.22 not locking desktop

On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 10:23 AM Narcis Garcia wrote: > I've reviewed privacy settings, with automatic locking enabled and timer > to 30 minutes. Screen goes to "blank" and monitor sleeps, but locking > feature has never effect. Are you sure "never" isn't "30 minutes after the screen goes blank"?

Re: Launching "Activities" menu, then typing => disables smart card reader

On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 18:56 -0400, Louis Wust wrote: > 1) Setting the scene: logged into GNOME on my work computer, which > uses >Centrify Infrastructure Services for Active Directory integration, >with my work-issued smart card plugged into the embedded smart > card >reader in my Dell

Re: extension.gnome.org Package Maintanence

ist about the security issues of extensions. The review process is important. See: Notes on extensions.gnome.org security https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9vblazv Re: Notes on extensions.gnome.org security https://preview.tinyurl.com/y9sbd2aq My fear is extensions may be made more available outs

Re: Request: Gnome-screenshot Crop after Screen Capture

Thanks Florian for directing me to the correct place for the request. On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Florian Müllner wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:46 PM Justin Riddiough > wrote: > > > After taking a screenshot, a dialog opens "gnome-screenshot" > > Yes, if you use gnome-screenshot instead

Re: Request: Gnome-screenshot Crop after Screen Capture

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:46 PM Justin Riddiough wrote: > After taking a screenshot, a dialog opens "gnome-screenshot" Yes, if you use gnome-screenshot instead of the built-in screenshot shortcuts. When run in GNOME, the tool uses gnome-shell's ScreenShot D-Bus API for the actual screen capture,

Re: Search extensions by UUID / UUID taken

12.04.2018 13:56, elbenfreund пишет: > Wonderfull. Do you want to get in touch with me then or prefer me to > poke you on the matter at date X? Since I did not received parthitce's response let's proceed. Please register accont at extensions.gnome.org  and send me your e.g.o. username or email. I w

Re: Apply filter effect to windows

On 04/18/2018 03:59 PM, Alessandro Re wrote: The Night Mode in GNOME shell is performing something similar to what I have in mind, although it is apparently working on the entire screen, and not single windows, but this is still Ok for my use cases, as long as it is possible to read and modify

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Le 16/04/2018 à 15:10, Paul Court a écrit : Apologies in advance if this gets mixed up. I'm trying to reply to a thread which was in progress before I joined the mailing list. I'm struggling to fully follow the in and out on the web version of the thread (https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Apologies in advance if this gets mixed up. I'm trying to reply to a thread which was in progress before I joined the mailing list. I'm struggling to fully follow the in and out on the web version of the thread ( https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2017-October/msg00034.html), but if

Re: Search extensions by UUID / UUID taken

On 11.04.2018 22:39, Yuri Konotopov wrote: > Let's wait several days for parthitce's response. > If he ignore my request we can assume that extension was abandoned and > remove it or transfer it to you. Wonderfull. Do you want to get in touch with me then or prefer me to poke you on the matter a

Re: Search extensions by UUID / UUID taken

11.04.2018 11:24, elbenfreund пишет: > Thank you for getting in touch with the extension submitter. I contacted > him myself some weeks ago without any feedback :/ Whilst I > have no idea who he is I would like to resolve this via him revoking the > submission as well. > > However, as we have work

Re: Search extensions by UUID / UUID taken

Hello list, hi Yuri, first of all, thank you for your fast and helpfull reply. On 10.04.2018 19:21, Yuri Konotopov wrote: > I can confirm that this UUID already taken. And email of extension > author with that UUID is differs from yours. > Here is review URL (it's publicly available): > https://e

Re: Search extensions by UUID / UUID taken

10.04.2018 18:56, elbenfreund пишет: > Hello list, Hello > project hamster [1] has just finished all new version of its shell > extension [2]. When I tried to upload it the form complained that the > uuid is already taken. Unfortunately there seem no way for me to figure > out what extension block

Re: Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK touchscreen

On 19/3/18 12:34 am, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> It is a whole lot different :). From the perspective of the >> application, a touchpad is the essentially same than a mouse, and >> applications have been able to deal with those for many years. btw since touchpad was mentioned, the current gnome

Re: Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK touchscreen

On 3/18/18 10:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: 2. the touchscreen seems not to understand multitouch at all so it also does not allow scrolling most of the time. If it is firefox or a terminal - moving finger over the window selects text. No two finger scrolling is possible (enabl

Re: Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK touchscreen

Hey, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 3/18/18 4:29 AM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: >> Hi!, >> >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Fedora 27, Gnome desktop 2.32, gnome 3.26.2, kernel 4.15.8-300.fc27.x86_64. >>> Lenovo Yoga 70

Re: Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK touchscreen

On 3/18/18 4:29 AM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hi!, > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Fedora 27, Gnome desktop 2.32, gnome 3.26.2, kernel 4.15.8-300.fc27.x86_64. >> Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK, ELAN touchscreen, Synaptic touchpad. >> >> The yoga is a convertibl

Re: Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK touchscreen

Hi!, On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Hi, > > Fedora 27, Gnome desktop 2.32, gnome 3.26.2, kernel 4.15.8-300.fc27.x86_64. > Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK, ELAN touchscreen, Synaptic touchpad. > > The yoga is a convertible laptop which I am trying to use as a tablet but > it

Re: Opening GtkDialog from gnome-shell

Thanks for the quick reply! Florian Müllner: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:24 PM, segfault wrote: >> In this design, to allow the user to specify keyfiles, there should a >> button in the ShellMountPasswordDialog, which opens a file chooser >> dialog when clicked. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any

Re: Opening GtkDialog from gnome-shell

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:24 PM, segfault wrote: > In this design, to allow the user to specify keyfiles, there should a > button in the ShellMountPasswordDialog, which opens a file chooser > dialog when clicked. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any code in GNOME > Shell which uses a file chooser di

Re: [question] valgrind stack trace under Native / i965

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:39:56AM +0100, Cyrille Chépélov wrote: > Hi, > > While working to improve my reports on > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/18, 19 and 31, I've tried to > run gnome-shell under valgrind. > > Jonas Ådahl's suggestion in > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/

Re: Wish to become an extension reviewer

20.02.2018 11:05, Daniel Landau пишет: > Hi, Hi, Daniel > I heard that there might be use for more reviewers on > extensions.gnome.org. I'd like to help with that. I have an extension > myself on there and have read the source of a number of others as well > as that of GNOME Shell. I think I have

Re: Customization - icon size

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 03:42:02PM EST, Luke Jones wrote: > This is something that is sorely needed, and has been needed for > a long time. I think the default mode of use expected is "type to > search" in the app list, but this isn't always feasible, especially > when you're not sure what you're

Re: Customization - icon size

This is something that is sorely needed, and has been needed for a long time. I think the default mode of use expected is "type to search" in the app list, but this isn't always feasible, especially when you're not sure what you're looking for, or perhaps you have a lot of games installed and are l

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

08.02.2018 15:46, Olivier Fourdan wrote: [...] > I think this is a different issue from bug 767212, so IMHO best would be > to file a new issue in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter and post > the existing reproducer you guys provided in bug 767212. Thank you, done: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GN

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

Hi Sergey, On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Sergey Dubov wrote: > I can say for sure Qt::FrameLessWindowHint is not override redirect Qt > flag on X11. > > Such windows are pretty much manageable by various WMs, accepts > activation, keyboard and mouse input (and produces other issues because of

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

Hi, On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Michael Thayer wrote: > We created a test case application for Olivier and he decided it is a > different case after all. xprop says that the black window is > WM_NAME-ed "mutter guard window". > Yeah, FWIW, in the Qt example provided in bug 767212, if I rem

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

We created a test case application for Olivier and he decided it is a different case after all. xprop says that the black window is WM_NAME-ed "mutter guard window". Regards Michael 08.02.2018 07:58, Michael Thayer wrote: > Hello Jonas, > > Thank you, that does look like it. I will tag onto th

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

Hello Jonas, Thank you, that does look like it. I will tag onto that bug and see what comes of it. Regards Michael 07.02.2018 04:21, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > The flashing black rectangle you are seeing could possibly be > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767212. > > > Jonas > > On Tue,

Re: Unexpected visual effect under GNOME Shell

The flashing black rectangle you are seeing could possibly be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767212. Jonas On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 04:16:51PM +0100, Michael Thayer wrote: > Hello, > > Wondering if anyone can help us with the following question. In > VirtualBox we need for various r

Re: [Feedback] hybrid GPU + multimonitor: partial success with Gnome-shell / Mutter 3.27.1 in Wayland mode

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Cyrille Chépélov wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > responding slightly out of order (both below an inline); plus we've pretty > much already started to bring this onto the issue tracker where this > belongs: Thanks for filing those issues. > > > It'd also be good

Re: [Feedback] hybrid GPU + multimonitor: partial success with Gnome-shell / Mutter 3.27.1 in Wayland mode

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:24:46PM +0100, Cyrille Chépélov wrote: > Hello, Hi! > > first of all, many thanks for the hard work. Thanks a lot for testing! > > I have an Nvidia GeForce 1060 GTX -equipped laptop, which also has a > perfectly functional and entirely adequate Intel i915-based vide

Re: Notification is hidden at full screen

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Mahmoud Nagy wrote: > I don't know if this suggestion really relate to gnome-shell It does, as gnome-shell implements the notification server in GNOME. What you are seeing is intentional though, to limit distractions while in fullscreen, only urgent notifications

Re: double-click fails to open files

What happens inside an application window is generally up to the application or the toolkit it uses - in particular what action is performed in response to events like single/double clicks is completely outside the compositor's control. That is, your problem is a question for nautilus, not gnome-sh

Re: aGlobally grab mousewheel scroll events

Hi Anders, what about using an easier hotkey combo. Personally I use alt-z to toggle zoom (just set it as a hotkey for gnome's inbuilt desktop zoom found in the keyboard hotkey section). Alternatively, in the extension you're writing, you can use Alt-z/Super-z for zoom in/out. The keys are right

Re: How to reload extension with modified code

that were removed > from > the Tweak tool in GS 3.26. > > It will install a new zip, re-install an existing extension from a zip or > remove an extension by removing the local extension directory. After any > of > these operations you must restart the shell session. > >

Re: How to reload extension with modified code

Hello Sergey, I have a tool I use to perform the zip file functions that were removed fromthe Tweak tool in GS 3.26. It will install a new zip, re-install an existing extension from a zip orremove an extension by removing the local extension directory. After any ofthese operations you must

Re: How to reload extension with modified code

the extension code and you have corrected the > error). That extension is > really not very useful. You can develop under an X session and re-test > under Wayland > after you get your code working. There are differences in the shell code > when running > under X that might

Re: How to reload extension with modified code

). That extension isreally not very useful. You can develop under an X session and re- test under Waylandafter you get your code working. There are differences in the shell code when runningunder X that might not work correctly if you depend on the X behavior in your extension.The only way to

Re: How to reload extension with modified code

Hi: A quick way is to login with "Gnome session on X" option; that way you will work under X11 and still have Alt+F2 -> r working. Of course, you will be unable to test things that are specific to wayland. El 02/01/18 a las 01:12, Sergey Cherepanov escribió: Hi, Alt->F2 + r does not restart

Re: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator new maintainer

16.12.2017 03:51, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) пишет: > Hi, Hi > As per [1], I'm the new maintainer of > gnome-shell-extension-appindicator, so please move to me (3v1n0) the > ownership of it on e.g.o. It's done > > Thanks. > > [1] https://github.com/Ubuntu/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/issues/1

Re: Extension transfers

14.11.2017 14:30, Florian Müllner пишет: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Mario Wenzel wrote: 2 extend my rights from reviewing to transfering extensions Done both (at least I hope I did - I'm not super familiar with the website's internals) I confirm that Mario have all needed website permi

Re: gnome shell issue with firefox and thunderbird

Hi, On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, at 18:38, Charlie wrote: > hey guys. i thought i’d bring up a bug that i’ve already reported about on > launchpad during the shakedown period of ubuntu 17.10 during development. > > i get some very odd flickering/pixelation/box shadows that seem to only occur > when i u

Re: Extension transfers

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Mario Wenzel wrote: > So I would request one or both of these things: > 1 join the extension-list if you develop, review, administrate, or > transfer extensions > 2 extend my rights from reviewing to transfering extensions Done both (at least I hope I did - I'm n

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Hey everyone, As there were no additional feedback, I just went ahead and worked yesterday and this morning on this. The result and attached set of patches are attached on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789852. I tried to summarize the various point, minimizing API change and imp

Re: How to find all panels on screen

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Sergey Cherepanov wrote: > I wonder how I can find position and size of all panels on screen. I need to > determine usable screen size/position for gnome-shell extension. You mean the area that is available to regular windows? That's called the "work area", and th

Re: Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 13:27 -0400, Norman L Smith wrote: > Hello, > > I did a quick test which may (or easily not be) a solution. > Main.layoutManager.panelBox.hide(); > Main.layoutManager.panelBox.show(); > It seems to work in a regular user session. I using GS 3.26. That worked perfectly! Tha

Re: Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

x, { > affectsStruts: true, > trackFullscreen: true }); > > I've tried putting it in _clearLockScreen and _completeLockScreen, > but > the panel never re-appears. > > Is there somewhere else I should put it? Is there a better way to > make > the panel disapp

Re: Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 10:29 -0400, Jason DeRose wrote: > I apologize if you are already past this, but all extensions are > disabled when the screen shield is displayed. Yes, I'm already past this. This extension is for the school I work at, where we want our computers in our lab to show somethi

Re: Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

ager.panelBox); > > > > The correlating code to bring the panel back is *not* working, but does > > not leave any warnings or errors: > > > > Main.layoutManager.addChrome(Main.layoutManager.panelBox, { > > affectsStruts: true, > > trackFullscreen: true }); > > &

Re: Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

t; not leave any warnings or errors: > > Main.layoutManager.addChrome(Main.layoutManager.panelBox, { > affectsStruts: true, > trackFullscreen: true }); > > I've tried putting it in _clearLockScreen and _completeLockScreen, but > the panel never re-appears. > > Is the

Making the panel re-appear in the lock screen after removing it from the shield

true }); I've tried putting it in _clearLockScreen and _completeLockScreen, but the panel never re-appears. Is there somewhere else I should put it? Is there a better way to make the panel disappear? Jonathan ___ gnome-shell-list mailing l

Re: Reassign ownership of gTile extension

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:30 PM Sergey Cherepanov wrote: > Hi, > Can we get reassigned ownership of gTile extension on e.g.o. > > Reasons: > Stuck PR > Largeish support community > Complaining users > Old version of gTile on e.g.o. does not work after 3.22 > > We formed organization github.com/gT

Re: Reassign ownership of gTile extension

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Florian Müllner wrote: > Please name one registered user on extensions.gnome.org to whom we > should assign ownership. I just read your previous mail to the list and reassigned ownership to scherepanov as requested. Cheers, Florian __

Re: Reassign ownership of gTile extension

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Sergey Cherepanov wrote: > Please reassign gTile ownership to me, or to any other member of > github.com/gTile organization. Please name one registered user on extensions.gnome.org to whom we should assign ownership. ___

Re: GNOME Shell crash after opening and closing laptop lid several times

Thanks both. Added myself to bug 788627. Regards Michael On 27.10.2017 12:31, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please report this crash as a gnome-shell bug on GNOME Bugzilla, and/or > to your OS vendor, if there is not already a matching bug report. > > If you report it to both projects (or find matchi

Re: GNOME Shell crash after opening and closing laptop lid several times

Please report this crash as a gnome-shell bug on GNOME Bugzilla, and/or to your OS vendor, if there is not already a matching bug report. If you report it to both projects (or find matching bug reports in both already), please leave a link to each bug report in the other one. On Thu, 26 Oct 2017

Re: GNOME Shell crash after opening and closing laptop lid several times

Please report bugs in the bug tracker. In this case, the bug is already reported so I suggest you add yourself to the CC list if you wish to keep up dated. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788908 for more details. Jonas On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 05:26:22PM +0200, Michael Thayer wro

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

2017-10-26 10:45 GMT+04:00 Didier Roche : > ... > And no, the chrom-gnome-shell notifier doesn't ignore them. > I have plans to make this optional so users can choose - whether they want to check updates of system extensions or not. But obviously this will not resolve your issue. P.S.: Sorry fo

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Thank you for the clarification on your proposal. The fundamental disagreement I have is with the idea that "you can consider extensions enabled as part of a mode as being really part of the Shell". I believe this to be confusing and frustrating to users already familiar with the extension ecosyste

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

I'm really consciencous that the content is a little bit dense, but I wanted to lay out the problems and thinking I had gone through when getting into it. Talking with csoriano, I think I came up with a nice summary for this proposal: Extensions enabled by a mode are part of the shell itself.

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

2017-10-25 14:15 GMT+04:00 Didier Roche : > I want to propose some thoughts and potential rework around system > extensions which are part of a mode towards update & QA process. > ... > > My proposal would be: > * Do not propose updating system extensions being part of a mode if his > mode is the

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

2017-10-26 10:45 GMT+04:00 Didier Roche : > ... > > If you ignore system extensions, then you won't be able to update dash to > dock and others in any sessions, which is even more restrive for people > wanting to do this. And no, the chrom-gnome-shell notifier doesn't ignore > them. > > > Hope t

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Le 25/10/2017 à 18:28, Jason DeRose a écrit : On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Didier Roche wrote: How come you are creating this breaking situation? Do you mind expanding on this? 1) Switch to Vanilla Gnome session. 2) Receive update notification for system-provided extension and take a

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > How come you are creating this breaking situation? Do you mind > expanding on this?> 1) Switch to Vanilla Gnome session. 2) Receive update notification for system-provided extension and take action, updating it via e.g.o. 3) Switch to

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, at 15:51, Jason DeRose wrote: > What one user calls "supported" another calls "stale". Just because a session > enables an extension doesn't necessarily mean the user wants the old version > of the extension. He can use the vanilla GNOME session then. > (I don't like that

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

Le 25/10/2017 à 15:51, Jason DeRose a écrit : On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 09:12 AM, Didier Roche wrote: The issue of letting users upgrading is the proposal of auto-updating. Nothing will tell that a new release of distribution X will have a newer GNOME Shell, and so, version compatibility check

Re: GNOME Shell and system extensions being part of a mode

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 09:12 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > > The issue of letting users upgrading is the proposal of auto-updating. > Nothing will tell that a new release of distribution X will have a > newer GNOME Shell, and so, version compatibility check (which is > currently disabled in most pla

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >