2018-05-16T11:29:25-0300 Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> However --- taking the same hook I used in a 20min talk I gave about
> free/libre software movement in May 12th on a city nearby --- functional
> data has some features that distinguish it from other digital goods:
>
> a) sequence of orders e
2018-05-16T01:08:07-0400 bill-auger wrote:
> i think adonay is mostly echo-ing my point that it is a shame that the
> complete corresponding source requirement is not encouraged or even
> mentioned as a option for artworks by those who have taken it upon
> themselves to define "free culture" for ev
i think adonay is mostly echo-ing my point that it is a shame that the
complete corresponding source requirement is not encouraged or even
mentioned as a option for artworks by those who have taken it upon
themselves to define "free culture" for everyone else - without that,
there is nothing to dis
I'm reminded of that long discussion also in Parabola's mailing lists
when their social contract was being remade.
If I recall correctly, both Parabola and Hyperbola seem to be describing
a practice which is similar to my personal one:
I'm a listener/reader/watcher/viewer of at-least-shareable
no
Benoît -
it seems that the impression you took of my suggestion for splitting the
criteria into separate threads was to only discuss one issue criteria at a time
and then wait for a conclusion before moving on to the next criteria - i only
meant that separate threads make the discussions more clea
Regarding all the discussion (made on the other generic thread
[GNU-linux-libre] Hyperbola evaluation, it is like this point is passed
unanimously. If you don't see an objection I will close this point and I
will open another Thread for another criteria.
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:43:10AM +020
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:51:31AM -0400, bill-auger wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 05:16 -0400, Ineiev wrote:
> > In fact, many free software licenses have provisions
> > against misrepresentation of the origin: I can't modify
> > a program and say that it comes from the original authors
> > uncha
On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 05:16 -0400, Ineiev wrote:
> In fact, many free software licenses have provisions
> against misrepresentation of the origin: I can't modify
> a program and say that it comes from the original authors
> unchanged; this still doesn't make that program nonfree
> in the sense of m
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:54:23AM +0200, Jean Louis wrote:
>
> I think there is something seriously wrong with
> those people who designed "free culture" to be
> "free" to change other people's opinion
> statements.
>
> How can a thought spoken by somebody at one point of
> time be modifiable in
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:48:22PM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> It doesn't say that "works stating a viewpoint" are inherently not
> Free Culture, it says that they are not *required* to be Free Culture,
> unless they are produced "by or for" Parabola (Hyperbola), in which
> case they are required
On Sun, 13 May 2018 09:47:22 -0400,
bill-auger wrote:
>
> Citing from: https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:social_contract
>
> > Hyperbola is free culture: All documentation and
> > cultural works included in Hyperbola are free
> > culture, with the exceptions of: works stating a
> >
Citing from: https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:social_contract
> Hyperbola is free culture: All documentation and
> cultural works included in Hyperbola are free
> culture, with the exceptions of: works stating a
> viewpoint, invariant sections and cover texts. All
> documentation an
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:03:33AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
>> If Hyperbola is Free Culture then it won't be including the Emacs manual
>> nor the GCC manual nor anything else under GFDL with "invariant
>> sections".
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
>
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
Because they are not under Free Culture licences, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Free_Cultural_Works
No need to re-go through the arguments, the FSF simple don't believe
that all their (or anyone else's) works
14 matches
Mail list logo
