Dear Derek,
in the other CVS branches we define the version-string of gnucash via
GNUCASH_VERSION=$GNUCASH_MAJOR_VERSION.$GNUCASH_MINOR_VERSION.$GNUCASH_MICRO_VERSION
and use this variable in AC_INIT. This is IMHO a quite convenient way to
define the version number and to ensure that it is con
Dear list and listening (no pun intended) Translators,
as we move towards the gnome2 release I remembered that the newer
libraries will finally enable a very helpful feature in the
translations: The libglade library now supports a disambiguation prefix
for msgids. (What's that: [1] below.) To
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> How could I convince make to finish its job?
./autogen.sh CFLAGS="-Wno-uninitialized"
is the quickest way to continue forward.
-chris
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucas
Honestly, I don't know why Jan did that. I have no objection
to switching it back to the other way.
Jan, if you're reading this -- is there a reason you did it this way?
-derek
Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear Derek,
in the other CVS branches we define the version-string
I'm trying to use the CVS version. I get this message when trying to run
autogen.sh
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was already defined in condition
!GNC_CTAGS_FILE, which is included in condition TRUE ...
Makefile.am:116: ... `ctags' previously defined here
**Error**: automake failed.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:07:25AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use the CVS version. I get this message when trying to run
> autogen.sh
>
> /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was already defined in condition
> !GNC_CTAGS_FILE, which is included in condition TRUE ...
> Make
Hi,
are your sure that this is an error that causes automake to fail? I get
that very same message every time I run automake, but it is only a
warning and automake completes successfully. If there is an error, then
it appeared in the lines before that. Please post at least 15-20 lines
of cont
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:24:04AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:07:25AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to use the CVS version. I get this message when trying to run
> > autogen.sh
> >
> > /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was al
Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was already defined in condition
> !GNC_CTAGS_FILE, which is included in condition TRUE ...
> Makefile.am:116: ... `ctags' previously defined here
> **Error**: automake failed.
That's strange. I've been getti
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are your sure that this is an error that causes automake to fail? I get
> that very same message every time I run automake, but it is only a
> warning and automake completes successfully. If there is an
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming
> wrote:
> Running automake --gnu ...
> configure.in:1346: required file `intl/Makefile.in' not found
This is not good. This file isn't in the G2 branch, j
Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of
GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF
aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library
aclocal:configure.in:843: warning: macro `AM_PATH_LIBGLADE' not found in
library
Runnin
Derek Atkins schrieb:
Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of
GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF
aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in
library
aclocal:configure.in:843: warning: macro `AM_PATH_LIBGLADE' no
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian
Stimming wrote:
Running automake --gnu ...
configure.in:1346: required file `intl/Makefile.in' not found
This is not
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:47:11PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming
wrote:
> Derek Atkins schrieb:
> >Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of
> >>GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF
> >>aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:54:20AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming
> > wrote:
> > Running automake --gnu ...
> > configure.in:1346: required
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
> >>On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian
> >>Stimming wrote:
> >>Running automake --gnu ..
I've gotta say, this list is great as I've solved so many problems just
by searching through the archives on my own machine. however, here's one
I can't find and I'm stuck
creating libgw-core-utils.la
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:19:36AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> creating libgw-core-utils.la
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
> libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la' is not a valid libtool archive
Try installing guile-devel?
>
>
> while d
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:19:36AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
creating libgw-core-utils.la
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la' is not a valid libtool archive
Try installing guil
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:19:36AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >>creating libgw-core-utils.la
> >>/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la: No such file or directory
> >>libt
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 09:01 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> > How could I convince make to finish its job?
>
> ./autogen.sh CFLAGS="-Wno-uninitialized"
>
> is the quickest way to continue forward.
Yep. G-wrap 1.9 also solves thi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:54:20AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming
> > wrote:
> > Running automake --gnu ...
> > configure.in:1346: required
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not being Debian-centric
>
> The state goal was to work on as many distributions as possible, and
> get a sense of what libraries are the right ones to target for each
> distribution. That's fine.
>
> I'm explaining which are the correct D
I'm wondering if we should use Jon Lapham's suggestion instead
of this one? I think it would work on more distributions, as
some use LANG and some use LANGUAGE...
http://www.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2003-September/010418.html
Just my $0.02.
-derek
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After updating to the current packages (libofx, gtkhtml and g-wrap) the
> compile seems to be working just fine under Fedora Core 3.
I see no reason you should've needed to update any of these packages
from what's distributed with FC3. I've built all th
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:14:31PM -0400 or thereabouts, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After updating to the current packages (libofx, gtkhtml and g-wrap) the
> > compile seems to be working just fine under Fedora Core 3.
>
> I see no reason you should've ne
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
<< snip>>
libguile-ltdl-1/unstable uptodate 1.6.7-1.1
I'm guessing what you need is something like that one: libguile-ltdl.
Is there a -dev version? Do you have it installed?
no -dev version that I know of or shows in the package lists, but...
<>
I don't seem t
This lists all the variables potentially involved in glibc's gettext (in
case we want to check all them in the same order)
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Using-gettextized-software.html#Using-gettextized-software
Didier.
Le mar 18/10/2005 à 22:55, Didier Vidal a écrit :
> >Fr
>From this thread on a debian mailing list, the sed on LAGUAGE should
then be sed -e "s/.UTF-8$//g ; since LANGAGE can apparently contain a
semi column separated list of languages.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/05/msg00219.html
However, the patch is meant to be uncommented, so the user
Quoting Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
test-date-converting.o: In function `main':
test-date-converting.c:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to
`timespec_sec_to_string'
test-date-converting.c:(.text+0x4a): undefined reference to
`timespec_nsec_to_string'
test-date-converting.c:(.tex
okay, now I'm running a pure debian unstable and it works, sure looks
pretty guys...
one thing to note. apt-get install automake provides automake1.4. i
followed with apt-get install automake1.9, which worked, but 1.4
continued to be the one that responded. So I had to apt-get remove
automake
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm not being Debian-centric
>>
>> The state goal was to work on as many distributions as possible, and
>> get a sense of what libraries are the right ones to target for each
>> distribution. That'
Still no joy compiling it here. If I touch dummy.c to make this go away
it just fails late complaining about not having 'ChangeLog' in the po
directory. No friggin idea why that is. I officially give up trying to
make a 1.8.12 release.
Chris
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:42 +0200, Christian Stimming w
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> ./autogen.sh CFLAGS="-Wno-uninitialized"
>
> is the quickest way to continue forward.
>
> -chris
Thanks everyone for your support to get GC build on my system. I think
this was the third or fourth time I've tried over the past year.
Needless to say, I'm really excited
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:27 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> My main question is now: How would you like to receive feedback?
The mailing list is the best place, right now.
You should look at the GNOME2_STATUS file to ensure that the problems
you are seeing are not expected nor well-known, but I
36 matches
Mail list logo
