Its very possible to begin he transition to C++ by writing C++ header files.
The real advantage of C++ is the ability to take a specification (in my
case the Intel IBIS electronic buffer modeling specification
http://www.eigroup.org/ibis/ibis.htm) and modelling it with C++ header
files that
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:20:51 -0700
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Then I can make a C++ class and move the functionality into
it one function at a time, converting the C function to a wrapper
with C linkage. I can test that against the existing C tests, add C++
tests, and move on to the
On Thursday 14 August 2014 10:04:55 Gour wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:20:51 -0700
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Then I can make a C++ class and move the functionality into
it one function at a time, converting the C function to a wrapper
with C linkage. I can test that against
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:04:00 -0700
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Hello all,
What is the motivation for compiling everything as C++ if it's still
really C and you have to wrap everything in extern C {} to get it
to link, especially in gnome and register directories, which can't be
Gour g...@atmarama.net writes:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:04:00 -0700
John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Hello all,
What is the motivation for compiling everything as C++ if it's still
really C and you have to wrap everything in extern C {} to get it
to link, especially in gnome and register
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:21:59 -0400
Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Ummm.. No.
OK.
The benefit of C - C++ is that except for a few minor issues with
keywords you can *generally* compile C code using the C++ compiler and
it will *just work*.
That's clear.
The same cannot be said for
On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:21:59 -0400
Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Ummm.. No.
OK.
The benefit of C - C++ is that except for a few minor issues with
keywords you can *generally* compile C code using the C++ compiler and
On Aug 11, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de wrote:
thanks for investing time in Gnucash and also in its development towards more
future-proof programming technologies. I was a bit puzzled about the benefit
of switching the normal compiling from C to C++, just by
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de
wrote:
Hi Aaron,
thanks for investing time in Gnucash and also in its development towards
more
future-proof programming technologies.
The pleasure is mine.
I was a bit puzzled about the benefit
of switching the
On Aug 12, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Aaron Laws dartm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de
wrote:
Hi Aaron,
thanks for investing time in Gnucash and also in its development towards
more
future-proof programming technologies.
The
Hi Aaron,
thanks for investing time in Gnucash and also in its development towards more
future-proof programming technologies. I was a bit puzzled about the benefit
of switching the normal compiling from C to C++, just by itself. IMHO, there
is of course an immediate benefit if the data
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 19:15:35 John Ralls wrote:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 16:16:17 Aaron Laws wrote:
I tried to follow the directions at
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Contributing_to_GnuCash, but I
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:04 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Aaron,
I've pulled and begun testing your guidcpp branch. It looks good, and I
expect to merge it to master today or Thursday.
Excellent! :-)
What is the motivation for compiling everything as C++ if it's still
really
I tried to follow the directions at
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Contributing_to_GnuCash, but I couldn't find a
Bugzilla issue encapsulating the Great C++ Refactor. Should I create one so
there is a place to put patches?
I learned on IRC that it is generally a goal not to have C++ keywords in
the
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 16:16:17 Aaron Laws wrote:
I tried to follow the directions at
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Contributing_to_GnuCash, but I couldn't
find a Bugzilla issue encapsulating the Great C++ Refactor. Should I
create one so there is a place to put patches?
I learned on
On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2014 16:16:17 Aaron Laws wrote:
I tried to follow the directions at
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Contributing_to_GnuCash, but I couldn't
find a Bugzilla issue encapsulating the Great C++
I've been doing some work on gnucash with relation to c++. I'm LMAT on
IRC. I got the project to compile, link, and run as c++ (no .c files I'm
pretty sure). I think it doesn't load any backends, and there are other
problems. I had to solve a problem with the module loading because c++
mangles
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Aaron Laws dartm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been doing some work on gnucash with relation to c++. I'm LMAT on
IRC. I got the project to compile, link, and run as c++ (no .c files I'm
pretty sure). I think it doesn't load any backends, and there are other
problems. I
18 matches
Mail list logo
