Re: [GNC] List Replies

Yes, I'm well aware of what the MacOS client does as I use it daily. I don't have an *iOS* device though. And the question wasn't about the buttons' current behaviors, but rather how easy it is to send to *any* e-mail address in any part of the header, or the body of the message. (and not

Re: [GNC] Significance of missing Bank routing fraction # on new check order

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:48 AM Bart Schroeder wrote: > Beginning to use computer checks for the first time. Received first order > from vendor without Bank routing fraction #. Worried that checks printed > without such info will be rejected. > > How critical is this info on my checks? Will

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Sorry, I had that reversed clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org in the cc: field, and the sender in the To: field. On 2020 Nov 18, at 11-18 12:17:03, w...@theprescotts.com wrote: Adrien, For your reference, in the MacOS Mail.app:

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Adrien, For your reference, in the MacOS Mail.app: clicking Reply: puts the sender in the To: field clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org in the To: field, and the sender in the cc: field. Usually what I do is hit 'Reply All', delete

Re: [GNC] List Replies

I'll add Mail.app on MacOS to the list. The 'From:' header has a down arrow to the right of the address. (visible on hover) Clicking it brings up a context menu with 'New Mail' as an option. (There is also a 'Copy Address' option if one prefers) As well, any address in the body of a message

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On 11/18/20 1:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:26:58 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone: Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* hide the individual's personal address

Re: [GNC] List Replies

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:50:07AM +0100, Geert Janssens wrote: > Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 20:45:12 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > > Am 17.11.20 um 19:26 schrieb Adrien Monteleone: > > > (note, private replies to this list are discouraged, so why make it the > > > default?!) > > > > and

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 20:45:12 CET schreef Frank H. Ellenberger: > Am 17.11.20 um 19:26 schrieb Adrien Monteleone: > > (note, private replies to this list are discouraged, so why make it the > > default?!) > > and we will end with public visible logs of online banking sessions. :-( > Keep

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:59:01 CET schreef Robert Heller: > At Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:26:58 -0600 adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net wrote: > > Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is > > configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* > >

Re: [GNC] List Replies

Op dinsdag 17 november 2020 19:26:58 CET schreef Adrien Monteleone: > Yeah, perhaps I'm not understanding something, but if the list server is > configured with the list address in the reply-to header, but *does not* > hide the individual's personal address (as described by Greg) how hard > is it