While this may be off-topic, sometimes the community needs a good
laugh, and today's XKCD provides a good laugh about random numbers. :)
http://www.xkcd.net
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/l
Hello Santiago !
Santiago José López Borrazás <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> How the two lines are removed that appears above all of the signed of
> messages?
> There is some human way to tell him al GnuPG to that show not those two
> lines of B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> There is some human way to tell him al GnuPG to that show not those
> two
> lines of BEGIN PGP MESSAGE?
Those two lines are required by OpenPGP and must be present in any
clearsigned message.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi:
I ask a question:
How the two lines are removed that appears above all of the signed of messages?
There is some human way to tell him al GnuPG to that show not those two
lines of BEGIN PGP MESSAGE?
TIA.
- --
Slds de Santiago José López Borra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> The present Windows GnuPG 1.4.X installs assume people [run
> as Administrator].
The installer requires Administrator rights to install to the program
files directory, just like every other Win32 program that wants to
install there. Once inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> But will it be supported in any near future?
That's up to the GnuPG developers, and whether they have any Vista
boxes available to do regression testing on. They may have already
tested it against Vista; I don't know.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
Robert J. Hansen skrev:
> It may be worth considering
> telling people that Vista is an unsupported OS for GnuPG 1.4.x.
But will it be supported in any near future?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> There will be a line that says something like "DBG: Using temp file
> such-and-such". Send me the tempin.txt and tempout.txt file.
David--
Vista has radically changed the process of compiling code for the
platform. Neither MinGW nor Cygwin GC
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:24:17PM +0100, Jørgen Lysdal wrote:
> Hi, it appears to be impossible to connect to any keyservers
> through gpg on my newly installed Vista box. I have disabled
> UAC and im running as admin, so that should not be the cause
> of any problems.
>
> Whenever i try to get s
Werner Koch said:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>
>>I tried the SET LANG=xx and as far as i read in the GPG documentation
>>and mailing list's posts, this is only for POSIX systems, not for
>>windows, at least in windows doesn't work in all the ways i tried.
>
>
> You
Hi, it appears to be impossible to connect to any keyservers
through gpg on my newly installed Vista box. I have disabled
UAC and im running as admin, so that should not be the cause
of any problems.
Whenever i try to get something from a keyserver i get:
gpg: refreshing 1 key from hkp://pgpkeys.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> wish that UIDs were more of a key/value system (one key/value pair per
You may use notations for this. They are however stored with the
self-signature, so some care needs to be taken.
If you need something simialr to the user ID, use the Us
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Otherwise, the gnupg manual page mentions an experimental method for
BTW, I forgot to remove the "experimental" tag. That is a stable
feature and useful for production.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
_
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:32:30PM +0100, B??r Kessels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Op donderdag 8 februari 2007 15:36, schreef Joseph Oreste Bruni:
> > You might want to check out "Domain Keys" which is used to
> > authenticate email sessions between MTA's.
> >
> > Also, peer-to-peer authentication can
Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This sort of overloading of the name/comment/email fields bothers me. I
> wish that UIDs were more of a key/value system (one key/value pair per
As far as I understand it there are no such fields. User ID is freeform,
just a string.
So feel free to put i
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> using PGP keys (or rather, uid's) with only names, no e-mail addresses.
> You could either use such keys with the hostname (or the full path to
> the web application) placed directly in the "name" part of the user ID,
> or develop some kind of machine-readable encoding to re
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:03:05PM +0100, B?r Kessels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the current growth of online services that talk to eachother (the
> web2.0) I thought it a good idea to think about a way to determine
> "trust" between the sites.
>
> If my site shares its spam tokens, comments, sear
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:59:26AM -0500, Mark Pinto wrote:
> I'm wanting to pass all of the information that gpg needs to create a
> key (key size, type, expiration, userid, etc) initially and not have
> gpg keep pausing to ask the user. I've read the man page, read gpg
> --help, googled, and I s
Werner Koch wrote:
> Okay, so it is not a communication problem with teh card. Please run
>
> gpg --debug 64 --clearsign test.txt
>
> To see why gpg tries to use the primary key.
aha! it does not. It's trying to use a different subkey instead.
Surely missing secret key parts would be cause
> I strongly advise against using expect to generate keys. Your expect
> script will break when we change the text that GPG displays. If you
> want to generate keys unattended, then use the --batch --gen-key
> interface.
i clearly understand that, and will manage my script(s) accordingly.
thanks
> Suppose my shell password is "SapNilph4" (I just got that from APG),
> is it stupid to make a passphrase for an ssh or gpg key by doubling it
> and changing the end, for example "SapNilph4SapNilph3"? Or am I
> really wasting potential entropy this way?
Stupid? No. May not be especially wise,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:44:02AM -0800, snowcrash+gnupg-users wrote:
> here's an "expect"-based function i use in a bash script for just such
> purpose,
>
> # function: "DO_GENKEY_SESSION"
> # auto-execute a GPG --gen-key session
> # usage:
> # DO_GENKEY_SESSION
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:59:26AM -0500, Mark Pinto wrote:
> I'm wanting to pass all of the information that gpg needs to create a
> key (key size, type, expiration, userid, etc) initially and not have
> gpg keep pausing to ask the user. I've read the man page, read gpg
> --help, googled, and I s
(This is as much about ssh as gpg, but I figure there should be some
passphrase expertise here.)
Suppose my shell password is "SapNilph4" (I just got that from APG),
is it stupid to make a passphrase for an ssh or gpg key by doubling it
and changing the end, for example "SapNilph4SapNilph3"? Or a
Hello,
Op donderdag 8 februari 2007 15:36, schreef Joseph Oreste Bruni:
> You might want to check out "Domain Keys" which is used to
> authenticate email sessions between MTA's.
>
> Also, peer-to-peer authentication can be accomplished via X.509
> certificates and SSL.
Ye, I am aware of the X
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm wanting to pass all of the information that gpg needs to create a
> key (key size, type, expiration, userid, etc) initially and not have
> gpg keep pausing to ask the user. I've read the man page, read gpg
> --help, googled, and I still can
here's an "expect"-based function i use in a bash script for just such purpose,
# function: "DO_GENKEY_SESSION"
# auto-execute a GPG --gen-key session
# usage:
# DO_GENKEY_SESSION (SELECTION) $NOTATION $COMMENT
# gen-key dialog options (SELECTION):
I'm wanting to pass all of the information that gpg needs to create a
key (key size, type, expiration, userid, etc) initially and not have
gpg keep pausing to ask the user. I've read the man page, read gpg
--help, googled, and I still cant figure out how to pass those things
to gpg while using --g
You might want to check out "Domain Keys" which is used to
authenticate email sessions between MTA's.
Also, peer-to-peer authentication can be accomplished via X.509
certificates and SSL.
Joe
On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:03 AM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
Hello,
With the current growth of online servi
Hello,
With the current growth of online services that talk to eachother (the web2.0)
I thought it a good idea to think about a way to determine "trust" between
the sites.
If my site shares its spam tokens, comments, search results, tags and pictures
(etc) with a cloud of sites, it could be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Mauer wrote:
> Remco Post wrote:
>> hmmm, more problems. I've decided that the ubuntu packages are broken.
>> I'll try again in a new release or when I gain some more patience ;-)
>
> Have you looked for and/or reported the bugs you found?
>
> I
Alex Mauer wrote:
> Remco Post wrote:
>> hmmm, more problems. I've decided that the ubuntu packages are broken.
>> I'll try again in a new release or when I gain some more patience ;-)
>
> Have you looked for and/or reported the bugs you found?
>
> It works for me pretty much "out of the box" wit
32 matches
Mail list logo
