Hello GNU-PG users,
I have a question regarding the export of a private key.
I want to transfer the key-pair of a GPG installation to a Java program (using
for example the GNU-Crypto library). Since there is a very large amount of
encrypted records I want to avoid to create a big convert-proces
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:16 AM, Lorenz, Michael wrote:
Hello GNU-PG users,
I have a question regarding the export of a private key.
I want to transfer the key-pair of a GPG installation to a Java
program (using for example the GNU-Crypto library). Since there is a
very large amount of encrypt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I have the right key. Thanks to everyone who confirmed it for me. I
would've sent myself one, but GMail thinks it's helpful when it takes
emails with my address in the From: field out of my inbox.
- --
Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB
Fingerprint: 4A84
Faramir wrote:
Then I began to think... what does 06/09/08 mean? Here (at Chile), that
would mean September 6, 2008. But on USA, that means June 09, 2008.
Clearly, since we are at August 11, 2008, the time format in the output
message is mm/dd/yy. But my windows is using dd/mm/, so, maybe at
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
It is ridiculously hard to come up with a robust time and date standard.
Why is that?
Note that in some instances, GnuPG will use an ISO date format as
opposed to seconds-since-Epoch.
Is this for non-Unix-like systems or is it something completely different?
--
Key ID:
Andrew Berg wrote:
> Time for computers is generally just the number of seconds since January
> 1, 1970 at 12:00:00 UTC if I'm not mistaken.
Time for UNIX systems is generally this way. Win32 and MacOS (pre-OS X)
have their own ways of storing time.
It is ridiculously hard to come up with a rob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Andrew Berg escribió:
> Faramir wrote:
>> Then I began to think... what does 06/09/08 mean? Here (at Chile), that
>> would mean September 6, 2008. But on USA, that means June 09, 2008.
>> Clearly, since we are at August 11, 2008, the time format in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Andrew Berg escribió:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> It is ridiculously hard to come up with a robust time and date standard.
> Why is that?
Well... just an example: some time ago, the Open Document Format
standard was created. OpenOffice uses it, a
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Note that in some instances, GnuPG will use an ISO date format as
>> opposed to seconds-since-Epoch.
> Is this for non-Unix-like systems or is it something completely different?
Well we use it for all parts of GnuPG-2 except for gpg.
The rea
