Hello
I have a problem to import my secret key into a iOS app called iPGmail.
The problem is that of course the key is password protected and the app
seem to have difficulties with the password.
So I just deleted the password and then can import the secret key, but I
don't like this
On Jan 28, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
Hello
I have a problem to import my secret key into a iOS app called iPGmail.
The problem is that of course the key is password protected and the app
seem to have difficulties with the password.
So I just deleted the
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
The cipher for the key protection is CAST5
However the key was originally generated with pgp 2.6.2 more than
10
years ago (yes I know it is only 1024 bit long and should not be
used
anymore), but could it be that such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/28/2014 03:37 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Hello
I have a problem to import my secret key into a iOS app called
iPGmail.
The problem is that of course the key is password protected and the
app seem to have difficulties with the password.
Kristian == Kristian Fiskerstrand
kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com writes:
http://www.kfwebs.net/articles/article/42/GnuPG-2.0---IDEA-support
#secure method=smime mode=sign
cool, thanks!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
hope so, but this isn't an easy job. I remember it has been discussed
here before.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991
support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Johan Wevers wrote:
Op 15-3-2011 21:57, Ingo Klöcker schreef:
Why migrate away? Even if GnuPG 3 stops supporting RFC1991 there
will always be GnuPG 1 and GnuPG 2 around to decrypt ancient data
and verify signatures made decades ago.
If that is the case, you
have used pgp 2 died out, which means for another century or
so (ignoring corporate users). Which is probably in any IT planning the
same as forever.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public
) or, very unlikely, 128 bit can be brute-forced in the future.
For now, I trust my most secret data to 128 bit strength.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl
. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:33, b...@adversary.org said:
Okay, so that would cover 3DES too? Surely there can't be many
No. DES and thus 3DES have a blocksize of 64 bit. The blocksize is not
related to the keysize.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
On 16/03/11 8:50 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:33, b...@adversary.org said:
Okay, so that would cover 3DES too? Surely there can't be many
No. DES and thus 3DES have a blocksize of 64 bit. The blocksize is not
related to the keysize.
Ah, right, got it. Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991
support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted data
to more robust algorithms.
Only if IDEA gets
. It would be best to have already done
so.
That, however, is true for any crypto algorithm, not specifically for IDEA.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
I sent messages to all key types, including v3 keys, using the
forced MDC,
(my preferred cipher is 3DES,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
I sent messages to all key types, including
On 3/16/2011 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
2 key or 3 key? 2TDEA only provides about 80 bits of security, and is
usually not recommend for use.
The OpenPGP spec requires three-key 3DES, and GnuPG conforms to the spec.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On Mar 16, 2011, at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
None. It's not a key type, but a
On Mar 16, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle
Johan Wevers johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote on
Wed Mar 16 09:16:56 CET 2011 :
Current OSes pose already a problem. PGP 2 did not provide nagtive
binaries for win32 so I compiled them myself
I've had a problem running Disastry's PGP 2.6.3 multi6 on 64 bit
windows systems, because the DOS
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:53, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
Disastry's signature is on the ideadll file in the ideadll.zip file
on his site.
So you trust some binary blob? .-)
Is that your signature on the idea.c module from key ID 621CC013 ?
Yes. Back in 1997 I implemented PGP 2 compatible code
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:22:45AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
Yes. Back in 1997 I implemented PGP 2 compatible code as the first
towards GPG. Obviously I needed IDEA and RSA for testing. That is the
reason why we have this code at all. Later a lot of people demanded
that IDEA and RSA should
3. Both IDEA and IDEA NXT don't meet the rigor of many of today's open
algos.
Substitute safety margin for rigor and I'll agree with you. IDEA is a
competent design by credible people and has had a whole lot of people
beating on it to only limited degrees of success: it seems to me they've
Op 15-3-2011 14:19, Aaron Toponce schreef:
1. The U.S. patent expires for IDEA on January 7, 2012.
I propose to include the IDEA module then in GnuPG 1.4.12 and 2.2.(then
current + 1), just like the extra version that came out when the RSA
patent expired.
2. IDEA has already been succeeded by
Op 15-3-2011 15:55, Aaron Toponce schreef:
Using this line of logic, web developers should continue support for
IE6.
I would not mind them using fallbacks when it doesn't hinder other code
or bloat things. This last requirement, however, is in web development
much more difficult to achieve
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:14:25PM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
I don't know, but I do know that adding IDEA does not complicate or
bloat GnuPG.
You're probably right. I guess I just don't understand supporting dead,
deprecated, proprietary technology, bloat or no bloat.
--
. o . o . o . .
Op 15-3-2011 16:29, Aaron Toponce schreef:
I don't know, but I do know that adding IDEA does not complicate or
bloat GnuPG.
You're probably right. I guess I just don't understand supporting dead,
deprecated, proprietary technology, bloat or no bloat.
IDEA is far from dead. I have
On 3/15/11 3:53 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
It's simple, data which may have been encrypted 15+ years ago may
still have value to the people who encrypted it, even if they have
since chosen to move from older programs (e.g. PGP 2.x) for their
current needs.
This may not be so much an argument
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Tue Mar 15 15:34:47 CET 2011 :
would like to see IDEA included once the various patents expire
As long as the non-256 bit symmetrical algorithms (IDEA, CAST5,
3DES, BLOWFISH) will remain part of open PGP, and the MDC needs
revision eventually to
On 16/03/11 7:16 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 3/15/11 3:53 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
It's simple, data which may have been encrypted 15+ years ago may
still have value to the people who encrypted it, even if they have
since chosen to move from older programs (e.g. PGP 2.x) for their
On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 3/15/11 3:53 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
It's simple, data which may have been encrypted 15+ years ago may
still have value to the people who encrypted it, even if they have
since chosen to move from older programs (e.g. PGP 2.x) for their
On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:24 PM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Tue Mar 15 15:34:47 CET 2011 :
would like to see IDEA included once the various patents expire
As long as the non-256 bit symmetrical algorithms (IDEA, CAST5,
3DES, BLOWFISH) will remain
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrot on
Tue Mar 15 22:28:23 CET 2011 :
I'm not quite sure what you mean.
The MDC can be used on any OpenPGP cipher, no matter what the
size.
Yes,
but it's done by gnupg by default for 256 bit ciphers, while it
needs the option of '--force-mdc' for non-256
On 16/03/11 10:42 AM, David Shaw wrote:
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
(or if the chosen cipher is 256 bits)
Is that 256 bits only or 256 bits and larger?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mar 15, 2011, at 11:41 PM, David Shaw wrote:
On Mar 15, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 16/03/11 10:42 AM, David Shaw wrote:
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
(or if the chosen cipher is 256 bits)
Is that 256 bits only or 256 bits and
On Mar 15, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 16/03/11 10:42 AM, David Shaw wrote:
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
(or if the chosen cipher is 256 bits)
Is that 256 bits only or 256 bits and larger?
Strictly speaking, it's anything with a cipher
On 16/03/11 2:37 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 3/15/2011 11:28 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Is that 256 bits only or 256 bits and larger?
Given there are no symmetric ciphers in OpenPGP that use more than a
256-bit key, I think the answer here is yes. :)
Heh. For some reason my brain was
a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: epflpepfl
1024-bit DSA key, ID B5AC473D, created 2003-01-09
gpg: cancelled by user
Can't edit this key: General error
How can I unlock the secret key? Please help!
Still trying hard to figure pgp and gpg out.
gpg-amateur
Gloria.Teo at bit.admin.ch Gloria.Teo at bit.admin.ch wrote on
Mon Mar 14 11:23:26 CET 2011 :
gpg: epflpepfl: preference for cipher algorithm 1
Cipher Algorithm 1 is IDEA, and was used as a default cipher for
RSA keys by 6.5.8
GnuPG does not use IDEA although it will accept the IDEA module.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:50, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
(btw, Disastry is the one who wrote the IDEA.dll module,
specifically to bridge the gap between gnupg and pgp users.)
Hmmm, the signature claims that I wrote it. However, I still recommend
not to use it.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die
iOn Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:50:29 -0400 Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:50, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
(btw, Disastry is the one who wrote the IDEA.dll module,
specifically to bridge the gap between gnupg and pgp users.)
Hmmm, the signature claims that I wrote it.
I
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:18, Ryan Malayter said:
file extension for encrypted files, whereas PGP Corp.'s products use
.pgp. But that can be overcome with configuration settings, either in
one of the programs, or by telling Windows what programs to associate
with which file extensions.
An easy
Alphax wrote:
re: setting the extension in Enigmail
I've filed an RFE at
http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15442.
Well, apparantly it's already doable:
You can set this with the following two preferences in about:config (or in
Thunderbird via Preferences/Advanced/Config Editor):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alphax wrote:
Conan Purves wrote:
Hello everybody,
snip
When I encode attachments, it gives them a .gpg suffix. My colleagues
who are using PGP Desktop cannot decode those files. Though I can
decode their files, either using the gpgee
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:09:21 -0400
From: Conan Purves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GPG and PGP Compatibility
have thus found Gnupg using the gpg4win front end,
running through the Enigmail extension on Thunderbird.
My last problem, I believe, is attachments.
using gpg4win
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:04:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to
[7] open file.asc using winpt's file manager,
forgot to mention,
it can also be done using gpgee,
and the signature will be verified, and the file saved
vedaal
Concerned about your
through enigmail.
Practically speaking, is there a solution for this? My colleagues are
most likely going to want to continue using PGP Desktop.
Theoretically speaking, what is the difference between PGP and GPG? Is
it just a different management tool handling the same encryption
algorithm
Hi,
Conan Purves schrieb:
Hello everybody,
I am the office manager here and trying to set up a compatible PGP for
some of the employees. I am looking for an open-source, free
non-corporate version of the software and have thus found Gnupg using
the gpg4win front end, running through the
Hi,
Conan Purves schrieb:
Theoretically speaking, what is the difference between PGP and GPG? Is
it just a different management tool handling the same encryption
algorithm or is there some further translation between the two?
They are two tools sharing the principles of public-key
Conan Purves wrote:
Hello everybody,
snip
When I encode attachments, it gives them a .gpg suffix. My colleagues
who are using PGP Desktop cannot decode those files. Though I can
decode their files, either using the gpgee contextual menu or
automatically through enigmail.
Practically
51 matches
Mail list logo
