Hello list,
I just want to tell as it is now: It seems to happen something
strange with network access within this PC. If it happens again, the
mail client Pegasus cannot connect at all to localhost (neither to
127.0.0.1) where GPGRelay (the GnuPG "Proxy") would listen - If
GPGRelay just would
On 12/12/16 21:09, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Well, the specific reason is that best practices exclude the usage of
> sub keys without any expiry.
There's nothing inherently wrong with non-expiring subkeys. Without
knowing the threat model, I don't see a reason to either start using
expiring subkeys *o
Peter Lebbing:
> On 12/12/16 12:38, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> You MIGHT consider having it expired as well, setting a decent expiry
>> date (maybe, expiry within 2 or 3 years).
>
> No, I don't think that is good advice if given without a specific reason
> to do so.
Well, the specific reason is tha
On 12/12/16 12:38, Stephan Beck wrote:
> You MIGHT consider having it expired as well, setting a decent expiry
> date (maybe, expiry within 2 or 3 years).
No, I don't think that is good advice if given without a specific reason
to do so.
The expiry of a main key already establishes that others ne
Matthias Mansfeld:
> On 11 Dec 2016 at 20:43, Stephan Beck wrote:
>
>> I'm truly interested in receiving such log files to have a look
>> into it myself, but the list may be interested as well. If there was
>> really something "special" about (precisely) my signatures, as you
>> say, I'd be eage
On 11 Dec 2016 at 20:43, Stephan Beck wrote:
> I'm truly interested in receiving such log files to have a look
> into it myself, but the list may be interested as well. If there was
> really something "special" about (precisely) my signatures, as you
> say, I'd be eager to know, check and take app
Matthias Mansfeld:
> On 9 Dec 2016 at 14:01, Stephan Beck wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthias,
> [..]
>>> Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better
>>> local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de
>>>
>>> Based on something strange on my computer (blocked memory etc. up
>
On 11 Dec 2016 at 13:40, NdK wrote:
[...]
> I think it could even be realated to some HW issue. Are fans clean?
Yes, and all temperatures are under monitoring
> Are capacitors OK? Electrolytic ones, the tall cylinders, often
> tend to "explode": they usually have an 'X' on the top and that
> sho
Il 11/12/2016 11:56, Matthias Mansfeld ha scritto:
> Currently I have not the time to go much more in depth and can live
> with the fact that in that moment much other stuff on this computer
> tends to hang and the "easiest" way for now is to reboot... It is
> possible that this behaviour came
On 11 Dec 2016 at 9:40, Stephan Beck wrote:
>
> Stephan Beck:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Matthias Mansfeld:
> >> Hello, maybe someone has similar effects or can give me a hint
> >> where to look. If not, it's OK...
> >>
> >> Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better
> >> loc
On 9 Dec 2016 at 14:01, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
[..]
> > Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better
> > local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de
> >
> > Based on something strange on my computer (blocked memory etc. up
> to
> > explorer.exe freez
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:13, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said:
> revokers. But that didn't work as expected. After entering the command
> "addrevoker" I was asked to enter the user ID of the respective key. Why the
> user ID and not the key ID or fingerprint? Does that make any sense?
You may u
Hello,
I have created another key for me (higher security level) so its user ID has
obviously the same name like the ones of my old key. I did this with
Knoppix 7.2 (i.e. gpg 1.4.x).
After key creation I wanted to add the keys to each other as designated
revokers. But that didn't work as expec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 26-08-2010 1:10, Paul Richard Ramer escribió:
...
>> P.S: this is the question:
>> Keys 1-3 of 3 for "theAddressIused". Introduzca número(s), O)tro, o F)in >
>
> The equivalent for "O" is "N", because the English word here would be
> "Next". For
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:55:17 -0400, Faramir wrote:
> Now, the problem: I search keys by an email address, and gpg shows
> me the different matches found, and ask me to enter the number of the
> match I want to import, or O for other, or F to finish. But if I enter O
> or F, it just repeats th
> I'm using GnuPG 1.4.10b in a Windows XP machine, in Spanish
> language. I don't know exactly the command used, since I use GPGShell
> GUI, but I already contacted the author of GPGShell, and he told me
> cmd-windows are GPG itself, so it is not a problem with GPGShell.
>
> Now, the pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm using GnuPG 1.4.10b in a Windows XP machine, in Spanish
language. I don't know exactly the command used, since I use GPGShell
GUI, but I already contacted the author of GPGShell, and he told me
cmd-windows are GPG itself, so it is not
Qed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I simply don't understand. Why list-packets reports these spurios(?)
> certification signature packets(they must be cross certifications since
--list-packets is actually a listing output while parsing messages and
under some circumstances also of the keyring. Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 05/12/2006 08:22 PM, I wrote:
[..snip..]
> I simply don't understand. Why list-packets reports these spurios(?)
> certification signature packets(they must be cross certifications since
> 39795DA7 is a signing subkey)
This hypothesis has been m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Using GnuPG 1.4.3.
If I examine with --list-packets a message encrypted with
$ gpg -e -r MyOwnKey
the result is:
> :pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 16, keyid 3645ABF6365A1799
> data: [2047 bits]
> data: [2047 bits]
> :signature
I don't know if it is a problem in gaim or in gpgme.
But if i send a test message to the person on the other side. And i
encrypt the message.
Everytime i get another data hash back. I mean that the data between
"- BEGIN PGP MESSAGE -" and "- END PGP MESSAGE -"
Is this expected be
euhm, this message isn't send...
you didn't see it ;)
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> I don't know if it is a problem in gaim or in gpgme.
>
> But if i send a test message to the person on the other side. And i
> encrypt the message.
>
> Everytime i get another data hash b
22 matches
Mail list logo
