On 2006-09-10 07:30:15 +0200 Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:21, Adam Fedor wrote:
RMS has offered to put something on the gnu.org home page about
GNUstep. Any ideas what we should say or ask for? I had mentioned
that
we are trying to organize a des
On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:21, Adam Fedor wrote:
>> RMS has offered to put something on the gnu.org home page about
>> GNUstep. Any ideas what we should say or ask for? I had mentioned that
>> we are trying to organize a desktop.
>
> Honestly, I'd ask him to save the offer for maybe another f
On 10.09.2006, at 13:03, Nicola Pero wrote:
Can we advertise ObjC + GNUstep as a 'truly free' replacement for
Java ?
That would be fun. ;-)
Not really, since you can perfectly develop highly complex multi-
platform GUI apps in Java, whereas this is far from realistic with
GNUstep, I am
On 2006-09-10 14:33:22 +0200 Philippe C.D. Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I would integrate Etoilé into GNUstep (granted the authors
> agree), update the GNUstep website to reflect this new "GNUstep paradigm"
> ("GNUstep" being a GNU desktop for X11 based Unices) and then adve
Patrick,
It should, yes..Alternatively, if you built with strip on, it should strip
the apps.
Recent changes in GNUstep have eliminated any difference in the naming of
debug, profile, or normal libraries... so you don't need to worry about the _p,
_d, or whatever suffixes anymore.
Current
Hello
I intend to write a SDL+OpenGL application based on gnustep.
I can use gnustep-base without problem, but i'd like to use some parts of
gnustep-gui (event management, ...) without any graphic or window
class/function.
SDL dont provides any graphic function, and I dont want to write à full
> > Can we advertise ObjC + GNUstep as a 'truly free' replacement for Java ?
> > That would be fun. ;-)
> Not really, since you can perfectly develop highly complex multi-
> platform GUI apps in Java, whereas this is far from realistic with
> GNUstep, I am afraid.
Good point ... I'm afraid I wa
On 9/10/06, Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we advertise ObjC + GNUstep as a 'truly free' replacement for Java ?
> > That would be fun. ;-)
> Not really, since you can perfectly develop highly complex multi-
> platform GUI apps in Java, whereas this is far from realistic with
>
Xavier,
You've given little information about what you're actually trying to do. Your
email details how you would like to solve the issue, but doesn't clearly define
what the issue is.
Based on the fact that you briefly mention OpenGL, I assume you want to make a
GNUstep application which dis
On Sep 10, 2006, at 18:19, Nicola Pero wrote:
Good point ... I'm afraid I was thinking of the "server-side"
Java. ;-)
I mean, you know all those "enterprise applications" that have no
GUI --
or that have a web interface as the user interface. :-)
Well, for the advertisement. What would yo
On 10.09.2006, at 21:34, Helge Hess wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 18:19, Nicola Pero wrote:
Good point ... I'm afraid I was thinking of the "server-side"
Java. ;-)
I mean, you know all those "enterprise applications" that have no
GUI --
or that have a web interface as the user interface. :-
Gregory,
Thanks for your answer.
I dont want to make a 'gnustep application', but an 'application
using gnustep' ;-)
Actually i want to make a tiny 3D game in objective C. You may see
that as a training (for me) and a test of the efficiency of
objective c for that kind of application. SDL is imh
Hi,
i'm new to GNUstep, i know OpenStep using osx.
I also trying to use the Hurd, but ...
However, i believe that OpenStep is the best interface/specification
to use a modern OS, using Objective-C (the best language). ...(a lot
of advertisement from OpenStep. DPS ...)
But GNUstep is not only t
On Sep 10, 2006, at 22:00, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
Well, for the advertisement. What would you say, _why_ is GNUstep
good for that? :-)
Eg Ruby tries to get into that market by allowing the user to
contruct flashy web 2.0 apps in a few minutes (and they do not
seem to succeed). Do we h
On Sep 9, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
Is it an ad for new developers or an ad urging end-users to try
GNUstep?
It's more of an add to get more help, but I think getting more users
would provide the same benefit.
___
As long as you don't call [NSApplication sharedApplication] (or, in
fact, initialize NSApplication at all), you can use classes in the gui
without a backend. But you have to be careful not to use any
classes/methods that cause any display or drawing. Also you could
create a dummy backend (som
16 matches
Mail list logo
