Hi, Adam.On 9/5/06, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you also put in a svn log and/or ChangeLog of what you did?It'shelpful for other people working on the project.I usually theChangeLog as the svn log entry so they are the same.Once I bring PC with new features into some useable shape I'll
Adam Fedor wrote:
On Sep 9, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
Is it an ad for new developers or an ad urging end-users to try GNUstep?
It's more of an add to get more help, but I think getting more users
would provide the same benefit.
Maybe the best way to promote
Am 10.09.2006 um 22:00 schrieb Philippe C.D. Robert:
[...] to focus on the desktop paradigm for X11 based Unices.
Good for advertisement as long as you leave out the emphasis on
X11 ... there's a Cairo backend already and an X11 requirement
would be a showstopper for many Mac developers
I would agree with Adams answer, go for a dummy graphics backend.
Perhaps we could even rewrite the back makefile to have gsc usable as such?
As I understand it you will need a window, or rather event server based
on SDL. Put that into back and perhaps somebody may later add code to
make this a
On 10.09.2006, at 22:43, Helge Hess wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 22:00, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
Well, for the advertisement. What would you say, _why_ is GNUstep
good for that? :-)
Eg Ruby tries to get into that market by allowing the user to
contruct flashy web 2.0 apps in a few minutes
On 11.09.2006, at 20:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take some time to look inside NSApplication code. This class
highly depends
on graphic display. It seems to me that it would be easier to write a
SDLApplication class with a partial NS-like interface, and then use
the only
AppKit classes
Am 11.09.2006 um 05:00 schrieb Adam Fedor:
On Sep 9, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
Is it an ad for new developers or an ad urging end-users to try
GNUstep?
It's more of an add to get more help, but I think getting more
users would provide the same benefit.
On 11 Sep 2006, at 20:07, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
On 10.09.2006, at 22:43, Helge Hess wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 22:00, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
Well, for the advertisement. What would you say, _why_ is
GNUstep good for that? :-)
Eg Ruby tries to get into that market by allowing
On Sep 11, 2006, at 21:07, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
Well, maybe was the phrasing slightly suboptimal, but not the
message behind it ... ;-) Besides, we don't have a desktop (yet)
and never will because some project members don't want GNUstep to
become a desktop in the first place.
I
Hey,
On Sunday, September 10, 2006, at 07:40 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
I'm mentioning this again in order to start a discussion on the
pros/cons of doing this.
since I find that lately gnustep is sluggish enough by itself and swaps
wildly while loading... I'd vote against that.
A
Well, maybe was the phrasing slightly suboptimal, but not the message
behind it ... ;-) Besides, we don't have a desktop (yet) and never
will because some project members don't want GNUstep to become a
desktop in the first place. This is legitimate, but I am convinced
this has negative
On 11.09.2006, at 22:06, Helge Hess wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 21:07, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
Well, maybe was the phrasing slightly suboptimal, but not the
message behind it ... ;-) Besides, we don't have a desktop (yet)
and never will because some project members don't want GNUstep to
Riccardo,
Could you be more specific about what architectures, how much memory, what
operating system you are seeing the sluggishness on? If there are performance
bottlenecks in GNUstep, this information would be extremely helpful in rooting
out any problems which might exist.
On both of my
13 matches
Mail list logo
