Dear Stevan
Do you mean I may be allowed to post in the future, or do you intend
to leave specific instructions regarding me ?:-)
Well, thanks a lot for the work done.
Amicalement
Bernard
PS You may choose not to post this one either :-)
* Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com, le
the
publisher's digital exclusivity on a given edition of the book.
I am fully aware that this is a somewhat different issue.
Cordialement
Bernard Lang
- End forwarded message -
* Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com, le 04-11-11, a écrit:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Dana Roth dzr
problem is that everyone is now working on the orphan work
concept without questionning it ... and it is nonsense.
amitiés
Bernard
Amitiés.
Hélène Bosc
- Original Message - From: Bernard Lang
bernard.l...@inria.fr
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
these ideas.
OA is more than simple and cost-less access; it implies the same kinds
of freedoms that a GPL ensures for software.
Much of OA thinking was inspired by the free software movement.
Jean-Claude Guédon
Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 13:21 +0100, Bernard Lang a écrit
Is there a distinction between papers that are just openly accessible,
and papers that can be freely reproduced on other sites, or other
media in your classifications.
I am trying o identifi the concept of an open work. If it is simply
something that I can access, that qualifies the whole of the
,
a red herring.
We need registration. And I am sure it can be free.
Bernard
Jean-Claude
Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 15:52 +0100, Bernard Lang a écrit :
Thank you Jean-Claude
But when you speak of the green and gold road, and their form of publishing,
does it imply
will be off-line for some time.
Thank you for helping.
Cordialement
Bernard Lang
--
Après la bulle Internet, la bulle financière ...
Et bientôt la bulle des brevets
http://www.strategie.gouv.fr/revue/IMG/pdf/article_HS7RL2.pdf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com
.
But given the ideological leanings of this lawyer, and the rest of the
document, I fear the worst.
This is relevent to this community.
I will not comment the rest ... just so that I have a calm evening.
I hope to have soon a pointer to an official version.
Bernard Lang
PS This reminds me
Hi,
I do not know whether the mail I am replying to went to the whole list,
but it is written like it was intended to.
* Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com note le 03-10-08 :
I have several times returned the postings of Bernard Lang to him as
not relevant to the American Scientist Open Access
, there are very different
proposals in Europe that may reveal dangerous. In a nutshell, orphan
works would be managed by collective management organizations mostly
controled by publishers. Where that would lead us is anyone's guess.
Bernard Lang
* Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com note le 02-10-08
=enlr=hs=5Jtfilter=0
There seems to be missing links somewhere. Maybe this should be better
advertised, including the paper mentionned in the forwarded mail
below.
Cordialement
Bernard Lang
- Forwarded message from amavi.tago...@aero.bombardier.com -
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List
on the writing of the report : this was evidenced
during a discussion with the chair of the commission, witnessed by
journalists.
Let us wish them well.
Let us hope first they do a good job.
Bernard Lang
* N. Miradon nmira...@yahoo.fr note le 22-04-08 :
On 11 April 2008 the European Commission announced
Hi,
fear and pride, carrots and sticks, and lots of variants ...
Well, that is certainly one way of looking at improving social behaviour.
There is another essential component : information and education.
People need to be tols in simple way why this policy is better, and
not in
subscription).
Thank you
Bernard Lang
Welcome to the club
What do you think happens with the much more widely used words open
source, even though there is a precise definition available on the
web.
The promoters of open source tried to trademark the expression to
prevent that. But they were denied the trademark (even though this
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0600, Bob Parks wrote:
Bernard Lang writes:
right ...
why not erase all historical mistakes from the history books ... so
that we can learn only how thing should go, and not how they can go
wrong.
I was not speaking of books nor peer reviewed
right ...
why not erase all historical mistakes from the history books ... so
that we can learn only how thing should go, and not how they can go
wrong.
Bernard
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:57:02PM -0500, David Goodman wrote:
If they disappear others may well make the same mistake. But if
universities may be silly.
but you have to be joking, there are thousand of more effective ways
to make $400 than fighting to be published.
Bernard
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 10:42:11AM +0200, M. Meier wrote:
As many of you wonder about the outdated media in which the dissertation
is published,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:27:05PM -0500, Albert Henderson wrote:
The 'profit motive' argument might have some
standing if the private research universities that
dominate sponsored research did not sport profits
double those reported by Elsevier and other
constante alors qu'elle évolue à
grande vitesse, ou à organisation sociale constante ... c'est un peu
triste. Sont-ils bien représentatifs de cette dynamique vivante que
doit être la science ?
Hèlène, tu peux renvoyer cela sur la liste biblio-fr, si tu veux.
Amicalement
Bernard Lang
On Tue
elle a, disons, des ambiguités intéressantes.
Amicalement
Bernard
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:25:17PM +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
L'observation de Bernard Lang a propos des bijoux passes par les paires
me rapelle d'abord la facetie sur le contresens de la part de Mme
Schwarz concernant la
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:00:27PM +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Chris Zielinski wrote:
Stevan Harnad wrote:
[. . .] Apart from wanting to be
properly credited for its authorship (i.e., protected from plagiarism)
and to be ensured that the text is not altered or
I do agree that toll-free access is the only essential issue, at this
time, and that mixing it with free software or open-content licences can
only muddle the issues ... at least where public discussions are
concerned, and current public action.
Considering alternative licences is however an
you also have symbions ... and that is even more positive
bernard
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:19:35PM +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Chris Rusbridge wrote:
Stevan, remember the difference between parasites and epiphytes. Parasites
kill their hosts. That does not seem to be
this: An item for your next FOS
Newsletter. On this particular issue, our narrower concerns about Open
Access to the peer-reviewed literature and the wider concerns about
open sourcing and public domain patenting of Bernard Lang as well as
the worries about University privatization ambitions
, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Bernard Lang wrote:
We can publish first, and review or copy edit later, in whatever
order is convenient, or never if no one wishes to do it.
We can publicly archive first (let's reserve the term publish for
something more than this mere vanity
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:19:23PM -0500, Arthur Smith wrote:
[...]
This means that the only remaining per-article real costs are
(1) dissemination on-paper, (2) any on-line enhancements by the
publisher (special mark-up, linking), and (3) peer review.
By (2) I assume
. decoupled from
the publishing. The technology is already operational.
And if publishers are such reliable people... I do wish to have some
books reimbursed ... they were published, heavily advertised, and are
crap.
Sorry no time for gentle words...
Bernard Lang
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:30
not read :-)
[ though I did read several of Stevan's papers ... ]
Bernard Lang
--
Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
SIGNEZhttp://petition.eurolinux.org/SIGN
bernard.l...@inria.fr ,_ /\o\o/Tel +33 1 3963 5644
http
I support this request.
Please answer the questions.
Bernard Lang
PS
I noticed that many people on this list seem genuinely afraid of
hurting the feelings of publishers. Stevan gave me that impression in
our latest exchange, to which I stopped replying because I had the
impression
.
PERIOD
Bernard Lang
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:20:39PM -0400, Albert Henderson wrote:
on Thu, 28 Jun 2001 Stevan Harnad har...@cogprints.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Unfortunately, Albert Henderson's suggestions are so repetitive and
predictable that they can be responded to by number
this is not directly related to scientific publishing, I am
beginning to wonder ...
Cordialement
Bernard Lang
--
Non aux Brevets Logiciels - No to Software Patents
SIGNEZhttp://petition.eurolinux.org/SIGN
bernard.l...@inria.fr ,_ /\o\o/Tel +33 1 3963
32 matches
Mail list logo
