On 2012-03-27, at 10:39 PM, Wilhelmina Randtke wrote:
So, what are the big OA search engines, anyway?...
without a way to find content, that content may as well not exist.
Most OA content (75%) does not exist (i.e., it is not OA).
Till it is OA, there is no point creating big OA search
[mailto:goal-bounces at eprints.org] *On
Behalf Of *Couture Marc
*Sent:* 25 March 2012 17:29
*To:* goal at eprints.org
*Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Libre open access, copyright, patent law, and other
intellectual property matters
[Apologies for cross-posting]
** **
On March 23, 2012, Klaus Graf wrote
Sale
Tasmania, Australia
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Sally Morris
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012 7:17 AM
To: 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Libre open access, copyright, patent law, and other
intellectual
this has screenshots of the BL charges. I entered into considerable
correspondence and I think the conclusions was that it was too much trouble
to work out what articles were open access so it was easier t charge for
all of them. I have no idea where the money ended up.
The BL did say
...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Couture Marc
Sent: 25 March 2012 17:29
To: goal@eprints.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Libre open access, copyright, patent law, and other
intellectual property matters
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Â
On March 23, 2012, Klaus Graf wrote:
Â
It's
Surlignage pippa.sm...@gmail.com pippa.sm...@gmail.com:
As a comparator, I can get water free from rivers but I'm happy to pay
someone to clean it up and pipe it to me.
It seems to be a better comparison is between choosing free water from tap and
pay for bottled water.
:)
Yves Gingras
[Apologies for cross-posting]
On March 23, 2012, Klaus Graf wrote:
It's illegal to hide CC-BY contributions behind a pawywall.
quoting the following excerpt of the legal code:
You may not impose any effective technological measures on the Work that
restrict the ability of a
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Couture Marc couture.marc at teluq.ca wrote:
I agree that putting a CC-BY Work behind a paywall is almost certainly
dishonest, if not fraudulent, because it makes sense only if you somehow
hide the fact that the work is freely available elsewhere. Things are
(0)1903 871286
Email: sally at morris-assocs.demon.co.uk
_
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Couture Marc
Sent: 25 March 2012 17:29
To: goal at eprints.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Libre open access, copyright, patent law, and other
intellectual
Sally Morris wrote :
Playing devil's advocate: aren't people (arguably) paying for the service
provided in gathering together the articles in which they might be interested
in an easily accessible/searchable form?
This makes sense if someone pays for a subscription to a service, like those
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Â
On March 23, 2012, Klaus Graf wrote:
Â
It's illegal to hide CC-BY contributions behind a pawywall.
Â
Â
quoting the following excerpt of the legal code:
Â
You may not impose any effective technological measures on the Work that
restrict the ability
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Couture Marc couture.m...@teluq.ca wrote:
Â
I agree that putting a CC-BY Work behind a paywall is almost
certainly dishonest, if not fraudulent, because it makes sense only
if you somehow hide the fact that the work is freely available
] Re: Libre open access, copyright, patent law, and other
intellectual property matters
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Â
On March 23, 2012, Klaus Graf wrote:
Â
It's illegal to hide CC-BY contributions behind a pawywall.
Â
Â
quoting the following excerpt of the legal code:
Â
You may
13 matches
Mail list logo
