for repository developers and
managers: awesome cross-search
Beall, Jeffrey writes
Could you please explain why you think ORCID is a step backwards?
I am not saying it's a step backwards, but it is step backwards
for open access.
The data is ORCID will not be open access data. Access
Lisa Schiff writes
Actually ORCID has a public API, though there is a request to use throttling
so as not to overwhelm the servers. I believe some guidance around this is
being developed, but you can use the API now:
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On
Behalf Of *Stevan Harnad
*Sent:* donderdag 3 januari 2013 2:09
*To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
*Cc:* SPARC Open Access Forum; scholc...@ala.org T.F.; LibLicense-L
Discussion Forum
*Subject:* [GOAL] Re: New Year's challenge for repository
for repository developers and
managers: awesome cross-search
** **
CHEER-LEADING, CHALLENGES AND REALITY
** **
What is missing and needed is not awesome repositories cross-search
tools.
** **
What is missing and needed is OA repository deposits, and OA deposit
mandates
Robert Hilliker writes
Further, as initiatives like ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor
ID) begin to get off the ground, there are opportunities for
repositories to play a key role in ensuring that these consortial
efforts help us to further the goals of the OA movement by enhancing
the
: [GOAL] Re: New Year's challenge for repository developers and
managers: awesome cross-search
Robert Hilliker writes
Further, as initiatives like ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor
ID) begin to get off the ground, there are opportunities for
repositories to play a key role in ensuring
Beall, Jeffrey writes
Could you please explain why you think ORCID is a step backwards?
I am not saying it's a step backwards, but it is step backwards
for open access.
The data is ORCID will not be open access data. Access to ORCID
data will essentially be limited to ORCID
for repository developers and
managers: awesome cross-search
CHEER-LEADING, CHALLENGES AND REALITY
What is missing and needed is not awesome repositories cross-search tools.
What is missing and needed is OA repository deposits, and OA deposit mandates.
The repositories are mostly empty.
And Google
The search graphic linked by Heather is interesting, as is the service
developed by Digital Commons. Unlike Stevan, I believe repository content
building and mandates will do better if developed in parallel with useful
repository services, and we should not forget that was the objective of OAI
CHEER-LEADING, CHALLENGES AND REALITY
What is missing and needed is not awesome repositories cross-search
tools.
What is missing and needed is OA repository deposits, and OA deposit
mandates.
The repositories are mostly empty.
And Google Scholar finds what OA content there is -- wherever it is
10 matches
Mail list logo
