Re: Fwd: Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-29 Thread Sunila Muzawar
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Fwd: Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes >Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:54:24 - > >Dear cybergoans, >I apologise(profusely) for starting this long, argumentative, >endless, and ridiculous discussion about mangoes, a week ag

Fwd: Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-29 Thread gilmen30
Dear cybergoans, I apologise(profusely) for starting this long, argumentative, endless, and ridiculous discussion about mangoes, a week ago, with a seemingly innocent post about malcurada mangoes, which are going at Rs. 200 a doz. in the margao market today, a price which I can ill afford, bec

[Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-29 Thread Eddie Fernandes
Dear Jorge/Livia de Abreu Noronha, You wrote: 1. "Coloration" and "colouration" are both found in an > English dictionary, so they are both acceptable 2. ..."mankurad" ... has entered the current > Konkani (and, by way of it, also the current English) vocabulary Thank you! Eddie =-=-=-=-=-

Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-29 Thread Jorge/Livia de Abreu Noronha
Dear Eddie, > > >OK, agreed that recent literature refers > > to "malcorada" as "mankurad"; but this doesn't mean that "mankurad" is > > correct, does it? > > *Yes, it does, particularly as there was incorrect description in the first > place as even you have agreed. Democratic choice of the peop

Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-27 Thread Eddie Fernandes
Dear Jorge/Livia de Abreu Noronha, >OK, agreed that recent literature refers > to "malcorada" as "mankurad"; but this doesn't mean that "mankurad" is > correct, does it? *Yes, it does, particularly as there was incorrect description in the first place as even you have agreed. Democratic choice o

Re: [Goanet] Re: Mangoes

2002-04-27 Thread Jorge/Livia de Abreu Noronha
Dear Eddie, I have changed the title of the "Subject" line to "Mangoes". After all, it is with Mangoes that we have been and are dealing in this useful exchange of views. > > Good, we are making slow progress . > I agree. > > The question is what that variety of fruit is commonly called in Eng