simplejson is included with django (and so with GAE) or you can use
any other pure python libraries :
http://deron.meranda.us/python/comparing_json_modules/
On 15 juin, 00:58, Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος)
wrote:
> It is part of the bundled django (from django.utils import simplejson).
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM, NealWalters wrote:
> The one thing I haven't seen discussed though is that you cannot do an
> order-by on fields from both tables.
You do that by copying the relevant fields to the "child" entities
(the "m" side of the 1-m relationship).
Dave.
--~--~-~
Well, it appears that they have (finally) fixed the problem after a
day and a half. The comment in the status blog is:
> We have determined that this spike did not affect the performance
> or uptime of applications. If you feel we have incorrectly diagnosed
> this issue please inform us by postin
It is part of the bundled django (from django.utils import simplejson). You
can also drop in simplejson in your project directory and use it directly.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:02 AM, deostroll wrote:
>
> Does the appengine have python support for parsing json-ed data?
>
> --deostroll
> >
>
-
Does the appengine have python support for parsing json-ed data?
--deostroll
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegrou
In InvoiceDetails add this:
invoice = db.ReferenceProperty(Invoice, collection_name='invoice-
invoicedetails')
For more details see this video and/or slides with full code examples:
http://sites.google.com/site/io/working-with-google-app-engine-models
The one thing I haven't seen discussed th
On the Windows dev-app-server admin tool, I cannot edit any table that
have Blob fields on them. I get to the edit screen, but I try to
change a simple string field, and get this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\ext
\weba
Thanks,
Datastore is safer and easier to handle for datamining that is for
sure.
But as this information is not critical, I worry more about
performance.
Memcache is probably fastest but also most complicated.
So how do these three methods compare in terms of performance?
Is it
- Memcache: 1ms
-
DB
Or you can store it in memcache (not safe but fast)
Or you can use both : save in Memchache then use a job that checks it
and store in DB.
Or Google Analytics ;)
It depends if you need to log a _LOT_ or not and if this info is
_VERY_ important or only FI.
Regards.
On 14 juin, 19:27, pranny
Your content will be stored in self.request.get('datafile'). Now use
any XML parser
On Jun 12, 8:29 am, Gaurav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using google app engine and i intend to read an XML file provided
> by HTML. I saw the standard example on google app engine doc. I am
> also using the HTML form
Speaking in terms of 'data mining' that you might be doing from the
user's action logs, i would recommend data store writes !
--
Pranav Prakash
On Jun 14, 9:28 pm, Henning wrote:
> We want to collect usage statistics with our app.
> Therefore, we want to track user actions somewhere on the serv
I have possibly deep entity groups (think tree structure), but I want
a URL where the user can go to a specific node, like:
http://viewnode/.
I'd like to use db.get() to directly access the node rather than query
based on node-id.
If I build the URL based on str(node.key()), then the strings ca
We want to collect usage statistics with our app.
Therefore, we want to track user actions somewhere on the server side.
Which option is more suitable, performance-wise:
1. Track user actions in the App Engine Log, i.e. write a log entry
each time. Evaluate the logs for usage statistics.
2. Track
The status page shows that they are have serious problems, but I guess
that they don't work over the weekend. Maybe someone will come in on
Monday morning and take a look at it. I wonder how the people who pay
for service deal with this type of issue.
Actually, since one of my apps will (as of Ju
Use the key_name or key_id in the URL, then use Model.get_by_key_name
or db.Key.from_path to get the entity when asked.
On Jun 13, 4:05 pm, david wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been looking for a way to shorten keys on URLs, for example: I
> learned that an entity key is built from the app id
looks i spoke too soon. I'm back to being unable to reach
appgallery.appspot.com
On Jun 14, 8:55 am, Peter Recore wrote:
> I can now access app engine sites again.
> As of yesterday though, my buddy with Verizon FIOS, also in the boston
> area, could not accesss them either.
>
> On Jun 13, 10:5
I can now access app engine sites again.
As of yesterday though, my buddy with Verizon FIOS, also in the boston
area, could not accesss them either.
On Jun 13, 10:51 am, Peter Recore wrote:
> one more data point - i can access appspot.com pages fine through my
> work network (also boston based)
I'm having an issue that seems to knock on all over the place...
For example, if I run "dev_appserver.py ."It runs fine and using
the web console I can add records. But then if I use ./manage.py shell
and import the models, there's no data in them.
Whilst in the shell, I can kind of ...
fro
Hi Nick!
Thanks a ton for the quick help! :)
On Jun 11, 4:39 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Knight,
>
> Your account should now be activated.
>
> -Nick Johnson
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Knight Samar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am facing the same problem too. I have posted the
I'm interested in the same. I know that you can get the clock-cycles a
request used so far by calling quota.get_request_cpu_usage(), but I
don't find this to be very useful as an absolute measurement.
The docs state (on the quota page): 'CPU time is reported in
"seconds," which is equivalent to t
after today's reset, not better. It was my last hope !
here is my app ID : dicoillico
I hope someone at google can help me finding what is wrong.
On Jun 14, 8:00 am, Philippe wrote:
> if it helps to solve my problem.
> On the dashboard of my app, I get that message : Your application is
> excee
21 matches
Mail list logo
