Re: [google-appengine] My expirencie with python 2.7 and others

Hey Brandon. I'm not clear how to read that graph. Here's what I'm seeing on my app, how do I interpret this and know if 2.7 is might help me? On Thursday, March 8, 2012 11:36:21 PM UTC-8, Bran

[google-appengine] Re: paid user, email delivered, but can't be received

I've exactly the same problem, after the first 100 recipients the delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help. On Thursday, March 8, 2012 5:11:38 AM UTC+2, Paco Paco wrote: > > The first charge was cleared, and 5000 emails are defin

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Down?

I've exactly the same problem, after the first 100 recipients the mail delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help. app-id: or-point On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:13:13 PM UTC+2, Holly Orr wrote: > > We are paying for the service, an

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Problem with mail quota

I've exactly the same problem, after the first 100 recipients the delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help. app-id: or-point On Friday, February 10, 2012 12:22:56 AM UTC+2, Ikai Lan wrote: > > We're running a batch job right no

Re: [google-appengine] Issue after HRD migration: 100 email quota until first charge cleared

Hi Christina I've a similar problem, after the first 100 recipients the delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help. app-id: or-point On Monday, March 5, 2012 10:56:52 PM UTC+2, Christina Ilvento wrote: > > Hi Anders, > > Would you

[google-appengine] Re: Error code 202

My issue is still not resolved. I am now getting a 203 instead of a 202 during what appears to be a cold start. The logs indicate that the gwt rpcs timeout. When I refresh, everything seems to work until an instance is brought up again. 2012-03-10 00:59:38.235 *** 500 89571ms 0kb Mozilla

Re: [google-appengine] Issue after HRD migration: 100 email quota until first charge cleared

I moved away from google to send out emails. My app now uses Amazon simple email and it seems to be fine! Martin Sent from my iPhone On 10 Mar 2012, at 08:59, Jonathan wrote: > Hi Christina > I've a similar problem, after the first 100 recipients the delivery is > blocked. After 24hours ther

[google-appengine] Re: Outages?

I'm also interested to find out how to get a refund after the reports I've submitted in the last 24h showing in this thread [1] that since the maintenance window Google AppEngine itself has been the only one responsible for consuming my quota. While historical stats have also been wiped out sin

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

Ikai Lan於 2012年2月7日星期二UTC+8上午10時14分54秒寫道： > > *Hi App Engine Developers, > > In the last few years, the Q&A website Stack > Overflowhas become an invaluable tool for > developer communities. We’re pleased to > announce that we are migrating to Stack Overflow as t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 500 errors + high latency + please communicate with us

hi ikai! same problem here: lots of 500s, bad performance and way too many instances running since last week. please help us with this! appid: typescout many thanks! thomas Am Freitag, 9. März 2012 20:57:58 UTC+1 schrieb Ikai Lan: > > Luis, do these happen on loading requests? > > -- > Ikai La

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Throttling and whitelisting

Yes. There was problem with our QoS settings. This 'backup' server is actually used almost always internally, and this monthly backup is, let's say, only time that it needs to connect to outside world. So our firewall and vpn gateway had low QoS settings for this server. So thanks for hint. The

[google-appengine] Re: Outages?

Alex, I believe it's better wait till Monday before starting a new thread as otherwise it would not get much attention. By Monday we would get actual billing history data for the 9th of March so we would be able to raise a case with some data so we can prove a pattern. In meantime I belive we

Re: [google-appengine] Mail quota Problem

I've a similar problem: after the first 100 recipients the delivery is blocked. After 24hours there is a reset , and so on. I have 10$/day budget but it does not help at all. The limit is 100/24h. app-id: or-point On Sunday, February 12, 2012 7:39:44 AM UTC+2, Robert Kluin wrote: > > They've bee

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Error code 202

I can also confirm the appearance of 203 errors again - which I had seen lots of earlier this week. Tom On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:09 AM, tarun2000 wrote: > My issue is still not resolved. I am now getting a 203 instead of a > 202 during what appears to be a cold start.  The logs indicate that >

[google-appengine] Re: Javaland scheduler behavior

Jeff, I'm seeing a very similar pattern in my threadsafe enabled Java-HRD app which does something between 1 to 20 QPS. I was experimenting with various idle instance settings and pending latency, and could not overcome this problem unless I allowed app engine to keep around 6 instances idle fo

[google-appengine] Re: Javaland scheduler behavior

Additional comment: Just while I was writing my previous message, additional frontend instances got started and the request counter on the resident instance did not change at all. The resident instance seems to be completely useless at the moment, as the scheduler started additional instances

RE: [google-appengine] My expirencie with python 2.7 and others

Most of your CPU is API calls. So moving to thread safe should help you a lot. Orange is your API CPU usage, and Blue is your total. So about 75% of your CPU is API, implying that your app does a lot of waiting on API's. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@goog

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Throttling and whitelisting

>My only concern is that there was no response from GAE team to resolve sooner this mystery. Support is not guaranteed unless you pony up for the support contract. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, s

[google-appengine] Re: Error code 202

We've been getting these errors since Feb. 13. We did a deployment on that day and I've been tracing through the code trying to see if there's something in there that would cause this to no avail. Our app is technically HR but we don't have any data in it. The app makes API calls to another App

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 500 errors + high latency + please communicate with us

Hi Ikai & Google team, Getting lots of 500s like others have experienced. Now mainly getting DatastoreTimeoutException... com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreTimeoutException: at com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreApiHelper.translateError(DatastoreApiHelper.java:46)

Re: [google-appengine] Lots of HTTP 500 errors and all instances restarted by GAE!

appid: textyserver Getting lots of: 1) com.google.apphosting.runtime.HardDeadlineExceededError exceptions, 2) Failed startup of context com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.RuntimeAppEngineWebAppContext 3) javax.jdo.JDOException: Transaction failed to commit at org.datanucleus.jdo.NucleusJDOHelpe

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Outages?

appid: textyserver Still getting lots of exceptions, mainly: 1) com.google.apphosting.runtime.HardDeadlineExceededError exceptions, 2) Failed startup of context com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.RuntimeAppEngineWebAppContext 3) javax.jdo.JDOException: Transaction failed to commit at org.datanu

[google-appengine] Re: Error code 202

I'm getting 203s as well still, and what I'm seeing might be insightful to the G team. Below are log entries for 3 failures. All 3 happened in the same page load (page request itself returned fine, and all 50 or so resources loaded fine except these). Of course, the user experience is that t

[google-appengine] Re: Error code 202

Forgot to add to last post: I'm using java, HRD, Spring for MVC, JPA. App id is commentousprod On Saturday, March 10, 2012 6:17:43 PM UTC-8, Mauricio Aristizabal wrote: > > I'm getting 203s as well still, and what I'm seeing might be insightful to > the G team. Below are log entries for 3 fai

[google-appengine] yet another pending latency question

I'm trying to understand why app engine spawns new instances of our app given our settings and a miniscule load of 7 requests from one client. Our application settings are: min idle instances: 3 max idle instances: 3 min pending latency: 15 secs max pending latency: automatic We run a client-base

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Outages?

Best explanation ever. On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 9:45:11 PM UTC+5:30, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > > > So, apparently, we all imagined the problem. The status page no longer > > admits to anything. > > In most systems the Uptime is 100% minus the summation of the downtime of > all other systems. The

[google-appengine] Re: 500 errors + high latency + please communicate with us

We too are facing a lot of 500 errors for our app with app id : 'justunfollow' On Friday, March 9, 2012 6:10:20 PM UTC+5:30, Nikolai wrote: > > > >

[google-appengine] Re: 500 errors + high latency + please communicate with us

My app (adb2) is getting over quota errors and is no longer serving requests. This has never happened before. According to the dashboard my app has used 34 instance hours to process under 100 requests which I can't imagine is possible under normal circumstances (especially since the app doesn't us

Re: [google-appengine] My expirencie with python 2.7 and others

Got it. I've flipped my app over to 2.7 thread safe.. we'll see how it goes, so far seems to be running without error. Early indications on the CPU seconds Use/Seconds is still showing a similar ratio between Total CPU and API Calls CPU.. shouldn't I expect those lines to come closer together?

[google-appengine] Re: yet another pending latency question

Additionally I just changed the max pending latency setting to 15 secs and still see app engine spawning new instances. Given a min latency of 15 secs and a max latency of 15 secs, I would think that app engine would definitely not spawn a new instance until a request had been in the queue for 15

Re: [google-appengine] yet another pending latency question

You probably aren't going to like this tip but: I find that any deviation from Auto/Auto produces a horrible UX. I haven't done a great deal of experimentation but all preliminary results have been bad - lots of unnecessary instance starts, many of which block user-facing requests. All on a near