Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

Seems to be fixed! On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:44:22 AM UTC-4, tarun2000 wrote: > > I still can't upload either. I'm guessing the appengine team is sleeping > now. > > On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:32:29 PM UTC-7, PK wrote: >> >> 40 minutes have gone by, the problem persists, no acknowledgment

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

I was just able to successfully upload... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/lK2Yhvfcxh0J. To post to this group, send email to googl

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

I still can't upload either. I'm guessing the appengine team is sleeping now. On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:32:29 PM UTC-7, PK wrote: > > 40 minutes have gone by, the problem persists, no acknowledgment from > Google here or in the production issue I opened > > The production issue I opened

[google-appengine] How to set Task Queue order?

im adding 10 taskes at the Queue, but i would like to a Task wait the previous task finish before it run.. Example: - Added 10 tasks. - Task 1 Run - Task 1 Finish - Task 2 Begin - Task 2 Finish - Task 3 Begin - .. is it possible? Leandro -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

40 minutes have gone by, the problem persists, no acknowledgment from Google here or in the production issue I opened The production issue I opened is 7267 if anybody wants to star it. Is this problem isolated on our end of the infrastructure, has anybody able to upload the past 40 minutes?

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

I have an app with billing disabled and storage over quota. The main point is that disabling an app is not like disabling billing, they are two different operations. -- Stefano Ciccarelli Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Wednesday 4 April 2012 at 00:43, Barry Hunt

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

Confirmed that reverting does not resolve the issue. ... guess we know what to "chat" about tomorrow -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

+1 Python 2.5 / HRD On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:26 AM, aw wrote: > +1 Python27 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this gro

[google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

+1 Python27 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more optio

Re: [google-appengine] Billing Issue, Who can I contact with appengine support?

hi, You can fill out this form if you're having billing issues: http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineBillingSupport On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Julio Heras Jiménez wrote: > A few days ago I activated the billing for my app, but I wanted to > increase the fee

[google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

Should mention I'm using Java, HRD, 1.6.3 sdk. On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 9:47:22 PM UTC-7, tarun2000 wrote: > > Unable to update app: Error posting to URL: > https://appengine.google.com/api/appversion/clonefiles?app_id=webaleppo&version=test&; > 500 Internal Server Error > > > > 500 Server Err

[google-appengine] Re: Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

+1 Just filed a production issue. I am on the python27 runtime. System status shows everything green BTW, there is nothing worse than trying to upload a fix and not being able to do it because of such issues. PK -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[google-appengine] Unable to deploy app anymore (500)

Unable to update app: Error posting to URL: https://appengine.google.com/api/appversion/clonefiles?app_id=webaleppo&version=test&; 500 Internal Server Error 500 Server Error Error: Server Error The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.If the problem persists, pleas

Re: [google-appengine] Channel API issues

BeaconPush are stopping offering a hosted service as of September 2012. See http://blog.beaconpush.com/post/17708826108/discontinuation-of-cloud-plan Your options now are Pusher (who I work for) and others listed on my realtime web technology guide

[google-appengine] Billing Issue, Who can I contact with appengine support?

A few days ago I activated the billing for my app, but I wanted to increase the fee and canceled the pedido.Ahora took me several days to make changes to the message always (Billing Status: Activating Billing) and do not know where to turn, I sent emails to the address listed on the panel but I

[google-appengine] App Engine Java Security Insurance

Hi all, Are google have security insurance to make sure that my application and my data is secure? I will launched my application on app engine as soon as I'm confidence with security. My application not using google auth or openid, it just use form based authentication and ssl that setup from we

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

My guess is that this really hasn't been thought out very well and is just getting worked out now. Deleting data is way more complicated than creating it, and overall it seems less important - it's for customers who are leaving. Seems like all startups are this way; ours is no exception. When yo

[google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Okay, that makes sense that you could be using other services even though the app is disabled. However, it would be nice to get a warning when you disable your app to let you know you need to disable billing too if you are not using other services. The whole "don't be evil" principle applied here

[google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Here's the issue if you want to star it. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7265 On Apr 3, 10:54 am, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > Sounds like a bug - have you logged an issue here? > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list > > Jeff > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 3,

[google-appengine] Generic error with get_serving_url

Hey there - For all of today, I've been getting this error: self.set_urls() File "/base/data/home/apps/s~everyday-app/android.357756108853417062/ application/models.py", line 1929, in set_urls self.url = images.get_serving_url(self.blob_key) File "/base/python27_runtime/python27_lib/versio

Re: [google-appengine] Channel API issues

Are you still having trouble retrieving messages? The problem with presence has been fixed since about 2am this morning, but I haven't heard any other reports of dropped messages, and I'm not able to reproduce that. On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Aleksei Rovenski wrote: > Hi all, > > This is cr

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Hah! So that's how they're trying to get around "just abandon the app instead of deleting all your data". I'm curious to know what happens when people simply change their CC#. Jeff On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Barry Hunter wrote: > Yes. Google have said this is intentional. > > An app - eve

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Yes. Google have said this is intentional. An app - even disabled, could be using chargable services. Most noteably storage. So to stop being changed for an app - you need to explicitly disable billing. A prerequisite of such, is that your app doesn't need more than the free quota. On Tue, Apr 3

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Mark Rathwell wrote: > Jeff, > > Quick question about CF, since you are somewhat familiar.  I currently > use nginx on an EC2 instance to handle SSL on a custom domain.  Also, > though, this setup allows me to do things like: > > redirect all naked domain requests t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

> Jeff, > > Quick question about CF, since you are somewhat familiar.  I currently > use nginx on an EC2 instance to handle SSL on a custom domain.  Also, > though, this setup allows me to do things like: > > redirect all naked domain requests to www > redirect all http requests to https > reverse

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

Jeff, Quick question about CF, since you are somewhat familiar. I currently use nginx on an EC2 instance to handle SSL on a custom domain. Also, though, this setup allows me to do things like: redirect all naked domain requests to www redirect all http requests to https reverse proxy www.exampl

[google-appengine] Re: ApplicationError: 108 when trying to open a blob as a file?

I'm still seeing this. Has anyone else seen this issue? I would love to get an answer on this. Thanks. On Feb 15, 3:10 pm, Justin LeFebvre wrote: > I'm trying to write a generated csv file line by line to the > blobstore, using the task queue, which will be eventually uploaded to > google docs an

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gwyn Howell wrote: > Have you tried this service? I might give it a spin. Any advice? Yes - I wrote that blog entry. We're happy with it. As I mentioned in the blog, it's likely we will stick with CloudFlare even if GAE offers SSL natively: http://blorn.com/pos

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

Not a bad idea, Alex. But I find all the approaches so far like a "looking the other way: excuse for Google. It should not be up to the users to come up with all sorts hoops and work-arounds to solve the problem. It should be Google the one trying to offer legitimate solutions. Until they do, my mo

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

I've been thinking about an alternative for awhile now: HTML5 CORS feature (here's a nice example: http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/cors/) That, of course, highly depends on the app structure. This could work if the app is using Ajax to deliver actual content to the users. At least for br

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

Have you tried this service? I might give it a spin. Any advice? On Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:29:04 UTC+1, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > Yes, the connection between CloudFlare and Google is unencrypted (at > the moment). But it doesn't defeat the point - it depends on what > your threat model is. > >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

Yes, the connection between CloudFlare and Google is unencrypted (at the moment). But it doesn't defeat the point - it depends on what your threat model is. If you are sending credit card #s to your backend, this link is a problem - it violates PCI requirements. For other data, it depends on you

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

I was getting excited until I got to the line "With GAE, you use the “Flexible SSL” option instead of the “Full SSL” option. This provides encryption between the browser and CloudFlare, but plain HTTP between CloudFlare and Google.". Doesn't that defeat the object?! If it's only encrypted as fa

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Sounds like a bug - have you logged an issue here? http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list Jeff On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Gwyn Howell wrote: > Same thing happened to us. It seems you have to disable billing before > disabling the app or they'll continue to charge you. > > > O

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

Or, if appropriate, use this: http://blorn.com/post/20185054195/ssl-for-your-domain-on-google-app-engine (CF is re-investigating whether they can run the last-mile in SSL too) Jeff On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Gwyn Howell wrote: > right. well as i'm sure your aware, ssl isn't available for

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

I just asked a quesition on stackoverflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9992726/how-do-we-get-app-engine-to-email-an-invite-to-be-a-developer and found the answer and tried to add it as an answer rather than a comment. and got this Oops! Your answer couldn't be submitted because: -

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

right. well as i'm sure your aware, ssl isn't available for custom domains on app engine. there is a trusted tester program runningyou may wish to sign up On Tuesday, 3 April 2012 12

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

The problem he is having is that secure connections are only through https://app.appspot.com and not through his custom domain. On Apr 3, 2012 6:51 AM, "Gwyn Howell" wrote: > > not sure i fully understand, but if you are finding that all your urls are being directed to https then you may wish to c

[google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

not sure i fully understand, but if you are finding that all your urls are being directed to https then you may wish to check your app.yaml file for *secure: always*. Forgive me if I've misunderstood. On Friday, 16 March 2012 10:03:47 UTC, msanztru wrote: > > Hello, > > We have added a custom

[google-appengine] Re: Disabled app but still getting billed for it.

Same thing happened to us. It seems you have to disable billing before disabling the app or they'll continue to charge you. On Tuesday, 3 April 2012 03:26:29 UTC+1, David Hardwick wrote: > > Hello, > > I've notice that I have apps that have been disabled for a while but I'm > still getting the $

Re: [google-appengine] Channel API issues

You are probably right. We should consider something like beaconpush, maybe it makes more sense. cheers, Aleksei On Monday, April 2, 2012 9:33:54 PM UTC+3, Tom Davis wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:08:29 -0700, Aleksei Rovenski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is critical and started to happen

[google-appengine] Two App Engine 'Office Hours' Hangouts - April. 4, 9am and 4pm PST

hi all, We are going to have two App Engine G+ Hangouts at 9am and 4pm PST Wed., 4th April, for questions and discussion. The first one should be friendlier to European time zones than some of our previous hangouts. One topic will be the features of the recent 1.6.4 release (< http://googleappeng

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Java Framework

I can certainly recommend Wicket. I really like how you create your project in that. Play framework is nice too, if you liked it, you should like Wicket. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to g