[google-appengine] Re: All Managed VMs beta instances were turned down in the past hours.

Hello Yannick, Thanks for your response. We were not notified about this in the Cloud Console. We are planning to migrate soon but until then can you share the maintenance notification schedule so that we know when the next shutdown is? Thanks On Wednesday, November 1, 2017 at 4:20:25 PM UT

[google-appengine] Help about AngularJs2 with endpoints Google app engine

Hi guys, This email is intended to ask how the consumption of Google App Engine endpoints with Angular 2 or Angular 4 is done. The tutorials that show on the web goes up to version 1 of Angular. Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google A

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache Costs

your data architecture and requirements. Andrei On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 12:56:09 PM UTC-4, Richard Cheesmar wrote: > > > George, sorry but I'm still not clear on this. Are you stating that I have > to pay for 1GB per hour even if I only require 20MB? > > If this is tru

[google-appengine] Re: Custom domain redirecting to appspot URL

We also have the same issue. Google WTF are you doing, this is not good, we pay for your services. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-a

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

y app code, > at some level. > > Potentially, there's an auth layer in your code that's preventing the > access for me, and not for you. Perhaps that's failing on the custom > domain, as well. > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrei Kamarouski > wrote: > &

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

om URL for your app, so this > would be an issue in code or app.yaml configuration. > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Andrei Kamarouski > wrote: > >> Ok. Seems redirect is gone. But now I get – Unable to access requested >> page. HTTP status code: 404. >> >

[google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

Ok. Seems redirect is gone. But now I get – Unable to access requested page. HTTP status code: 404. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

I don't need SSL at the moment. On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 9:04:54 PM UTC+3, joshuamo wrote: > > Your second screenshot shows that no certificates have been uploaded. You > should follow the documentation starting from here: > https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/console/using-cus

[google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

That's one I have uploaded to appspot project. On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:52:55 PM UTC+3, Zeehad (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Can you post the app.yaml showing how you're handling URLs? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App En

[google-appengine] Re: Domain pointing issue

Maybe but I haven't any unfinished SSL setups. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to th

[google-appengine] Domain pointing issue

Hi! Trying to point my domain to app (following https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/console/using-custom-domains-and-ssl), but no result. Where am I wrong? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [google-appengine] Java & Python Modules in Same App -- How?

fyi This actually turned out to be really simple. I created a new subdirectory that contains the configuration & code for my Java module. Then I simply added the tags to appengine-web.xml & ran mvn appengine:update. On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 1:11:11 AM UTC-5, PK wrote: >

[google-appengine] Java & Python Modules in Same App -- How?

web.xml configs? Thank you in advance for taking a look! -Andrei -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@goo

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Updates to managed VMs stopped working

#5 on StackOverflow based on the number of answered questions (477) about App Engine :) Andrei On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Adam (Cloud Platform Support) < araf...@google.com> wrote: > The only recommendation I have is to try deleting all versions of Managed > VM modules from App Engine ->

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Updates to managed VMs stopped working

instance for a while ("gae-builder-vm-1d", where 1d is module version). Then I see a vm instance, like "gae-backend-1d-xxoc". It spins for a long time, and finally turns green. It still shows 503 "The service you requested is not available yet." when I try to access it from

[google-appengine] Updates to managed VMs stopped working

Starting from last night updates to modules using managed VMs started to fail for my project (id="filemambo"). appcfg update now results in java.lang.RuntimeException: Fatal problem encountered during deployment. Please refer to the logs for more information. at com.google.appengine.too

Re: [google-appengine] Final opportunity to try the beta Google Cloud Platform console before its release

Patrice, In the Datastore/Query panel, please, do not load the first entity kind by default. The probability that a user wants to see exactly the first 50 entities of exactly the first entity kind on _every_ visit is extremely low, so there is no need to make a user wait every time until these

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console Log UI -- One Request Broken Up Into Several Expandable Rows

15 at 11:55:50 AM UTC-4, PK wrote: > > I run into this today as well in the new UI. Very annoying, I hope it gets > fixed soon. > > --PK > > On Oct 5, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Patrice (Cloud Platform Support) < > pvout...@google.com > wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > &g

[google-appengine] Re: Console Log UI -- One Request Broken Up Into Several Expandable Rows

Ping. Any updates on this? On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 4:42:47 AM UTC-4, pdknsk wrote: > > PS. By continuous logging I mean streaming logs. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop r

[google-appengine] Re: Console Log UI -- One Request Broken Up Into Several Expandable Rows

Apologies for the reply delay... Below are screenshots that should help paint a better picture of what I'm talking about. Please excuse all the blurring... still operating in stealth mode. *Fragmented request in the console log UI* Beginning of request:

[google-appengine] Console Log UI -- One Request Broken Up Into Several Expandable Rows

Hello, Have there been any recent changes to developer console's Logs UI? Within the past day or two I've started seeing logs of long running requests (i.e. ones w/ lots of log entries) get split up into several separate expandable columns - i.e. the full log of a request can no longer be see

Re: [google-appengine] Re: too many appengine frontend instances

The issue begun with v. 1.9.5 but now the new instaces are created with 1.9.4 so i have about 220 instances on 1.9.5 and 110 on 1.9.4. On 9 May 2014 12:21, "timh" wrote: > I am still on 1.9.4 and not seeing this. > > Is everyone experiencing this rolled over to 1.9.5 ? > > T > > On Friday, May 9,

[google-appengine] Re: Can Application Settings anyhow guarantee me exactly 2 instances?

Aron, If you need exactly two instances and the cost is of importance, you should consider running your application on two Compute Engine instances that cost many times less than the App Engine instances. You can still access the datastore. -- You received this message because you are subscri

[google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

@Tapir Move your app to Compute Engine and stop complaining. You can still use the Datastore, but your instance will cost you much less. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

[google-appengine] Re: Java example on how to upload csv data to the data store

If you want to convert CSV data into entities, you may use http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencsv/ to process your CVS file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

[google-appengine] Re: If I run an application on the appengine from outside of US, what country's laws determines whether an app is legal?

This is a very complex issue, and there is no universal answer. I had to deal with it several times. For example, if a book is in the public domain in one country and still under the copyright in another, you may be liable in that country if you allow a user from that country to download it. In

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Project vs. Application and sharing data in storage

Use versions for QA. You deploy a new version to GAE, but you don't make it a default version until the QA is done. Just remember to create a special user account (or whatever your app uses) for QA so they don't mess up other users' data. Also, if you make a new version the default one (after t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

App Engine is very cheap for startups. I would even say it's a game-changer. I built two startups before PaaS became an option, and I can say with certainty that App Engine would have saved me millions of dollars each time. Most new applications can happily live within a free quota until they p

[google-appengine] Re: “Server Error” after a few hours idle when using AppEngine OpenID login

I see the same error from time to time when a user clicks on a link to get Google account OpenId authentication. Nothing in the server logs. (I am not using any plugins) Is this an App Engine issue or a Google account issue? On Saturday, May 25, 2013 3:41:26 PM UTC-4, Graeme Pyle wrote: > > Wh

[google-appengine] Re: Internal Server 500 error when transitioning to a newer version of code with logged in users

user that a new version of the app is available, and ask them to reload the page. You don't need to add a version number to the User model. We store client version number in a session attribute. Then we compare it to SystemProperty. applicationVersion.get(). Andrei Volgin www.spiralun

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Splitting Client and Server side in 2 AppEngines to keep server side code confidential

the same API that you expose to your partners. If you open the client-side library, your own client may remain closed and use RPC, while the open client library will use the API. Andrei Volgin On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Ben wrote: > > Thus the idea to split our appli

Re: [google-appengine] Re: European hosted apps - when will $500 fee be lifted?

People who want total lock down should not use the Internet. Period. Safe Harbor works for us too. Most customers in Europe are reasonable people. On Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:34:02 AM UTC-4, alex wrote: > > Besides, what happens in reality (at > least, in my experience) is that people and o

[google-appengine] Re: Search service - pricing

Just to clarify: for 1.2 euros you get 100,000 searches, not 1,000. "Savaş L." Oct 04 04:24AM -0700 0.0012 cent per look up makes 1.2 dollar for 1000 searches.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on

[google-appengine] Re: Error on Conversion API: NPE when instantiating ConversionResult object

I was just informed that the Conversion API will be discontinued in November of this year. I guess, it's time to look for an alternative solution. Too bad, I think it's a very useful API. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To

[google-appengine] Re: What are the pros and cons of using Google App engine for my startup?

Pros: You don't need your own servers. You don't need system admins. You don't need database admins. You don't worry about replication and backups. Many useful built-in services (Users, Blobstore, etc.) Appengine is free until your traffic picks up. Seamless (almost) deployment of new versions. Co

[google-appengine] Re: 10mb deploy size limit

Phil, > > Your record shows that you exceeded 1GB limit (1073741824 bytes), not 10MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/_1QJBWIITmoJ.

[google-appengine] Re: Startup time exceeded...on F4?!

I have a large GWT app with over 50 complex data entities with very complicated relationships between them. There are over 100 RPC methods, and I use various GAE services (Users, Memcache, Blobstore, Images, and Mail). My new instance startup time ranges from 4 to 5 sec on F1. Sometimes it goe

[google-appengine] Re: AWS releases cloud search

I wrote Mongodb rest server in java with lucene search built in Give it a try https://sites.google.com/site/mongodbjavarestserver/ For example I did insert timing and on 2 cents/hour hpcloud server it does 1000 inserts per second On Apr 12, 3:24 pm, Andrei wrote: > There is one more based

[google-appengine] Re: AWS releases cloud search

There is one more based on lucene http://www.elasticsearch.org On Apr 12, 2:55 pm, Adam Sah wrote: > actually, after a year+ watching things develop, I'm glad we chose to roll > our own from Apache/SOLR/Lucene and *not* go with a cloud service: >  - finer-grained controls over which fields are in

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

ted/usingdatastore It says you can still use MS, it does not say Google will delete MS data after 3 years On Apr 9, 7:13 pm, Andrei wrote: > Thanks > I have app developed in 2009 that is on MS > I really want a manager, may be Chris, to explain why in GAE > environment I need to > m

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

AM, Andrei wrote: > > Yes, I've been unhappy with GAE for a year now (started GAE in 2009) > > But it's a joy for me to work on aws > > Well go use it then! > > If you found a platform that works for you, then great, use it. > > Its important to realise a parti

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

t is your mindset you will always be > very sad, and unhappy with the service and how your software performs on it. > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google- > > appeng...@googlegroups

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

Thanks Chris Why do i need to know how you store my data, in HDR MS or anything else I want to use API - that's it You are asking me to move my data from one type of db to another That sound like sysadmin job, which is yours On Apr 9, 10:26 am, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > Andrei, > >

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

Why don't you move it for me, I do not mind When I started only MS option was available It's your problem to move my data now On Apr 5, 6:24 pm, Alfred Fuller wrote: > We've already lasted 4 years, which makes us an outlier in your list :-). > > > > > > > &

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

will gae last 3 years? google wave, google buzz, ... gae? On Apr 4, 11:20 pm, Andrei wrote: > 3 years from now? > > On Apr 4, 4:42 pm, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > > > > > > > > > *Hey App Engine Users,* > > * > > > Almost 4 years after > >

[google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

3 years from now? On Apr 4, 4:42 pm, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > *Hey App Engine Users,* > * > > Almost 4 years after > launch, > we’ve seen fantastic growth both in Google App Engine and the apps that run > on it. And although

Re: [google-appengine] Redirect to original href when using federated login

I used url encode to generate a redirectLink that looks something like this: http%3A%2F%2Fvers.myappid.appspot.com%2page.html%3Flocale%3Dro%23m%3myhistorytoken Now, when I call the createLoginURL method i get this: http://vers.myappid.appspot.com/_ah/login_redir?claimid=www.google.com/accounts

[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine suitable for write intensive applications?

Thank you for the feedback. It helped me better understand what the platform offers and how to take advantage of its capabilities. Regards, Andrei On Jan 30, 7:40 am, Robert Kluin wrote: > Hi Andrei, >   I just wanted to comment on one little thing in addition to all the > stuff Jeff s

[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine suitable for write intensive applications?

subsequent writes (transactional or not) to that group? Regards, Andrei On Jan 28, 7:20 am, Robert Kluin wrote: > One of the things that amazes me so much about App Engine is that it can > handle hundreds, or thousands, of writes per second. I've seen it do this > numerous times.

[google-appengine] Is App Engine suitable for write intensive applications?

problems you encountered along the way. Regards, Andrei -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/bW3pKqHKcSEJ. To post to th

[google-appengine] Re: ROFLMFAO DynamoDB From Amazon

This is off topic, but I am writing JavaScript interface for DynamoDB You can read here https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=85588&tstart=0 On Jan 23, 3:10 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote: > It is apparently optimized for 16k minus some overhead. > > > > > > > > -Original Message-

[google-appengine] Re: ROFLMFAO DynamoDB From Amazon

gt; From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com > > [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrei > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:29 PM > To: Google App Engine > Subject: [google-appengine] Re: ROFLMFAO DynamoDB From Amazon > > that is 250K per second, not per h

[google-appengine] Re: ROFLMFAO DynamoDB From Amazon

I'll bet money I can push GAE to 1M easily. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com > > [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrei > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:31 PM > To: Google App E

[google-appengine] Re: ROFLMFAO DynamoDB From Amazon

They claim you can do 250,000 writes per second On Jan 18, 1:57 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote: > Google should pay me to do a parody of > thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded > > &v=oz-7wJJ9HZ0#! > I might do

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Sending email without warning "This message may not have been sent by..."

So if the user that sends email belongs to that group list, the warning will not appear? On Dec 21, 2011 6:51 PM, "voscausa" wrote: > I'am not very familiar with groups. But I know that in some groups > everybody can address the group members. Than it is not clear for the > group, who has send t

[google-appengine] Re: Isn't .08/hr 1.92/day $59.52/month for a 600 MHZ CPU instance with 128 MB memory a LITTLE EXPENSIVE

Goog only very recently switched to new pricing and they need to see how it sells It is probably will not sell good and significant number of people will leave So after they figure it out they'll make it cheaper, they'll have to It will probably take at least half year for them to figure current p

[google-appengine] Re: Feature Request I Think....

Allowing several apps to talk to the same Datastore may be a good idea in its own right, but it would the wrong way to look at this issue. Most apps combine slow and fast requests in a way that makes them hard to separate. If I can specify that requests A, B and C go to "instance type 1", and reque

[google-appengine] Re: Idle instances do not turn off automatically. Please help

I also noticed that on my default version there are two instances with 1h53m age and one is with 1 request, the other with 2. Another instance with 1h33m age has 4 requests... so the instances will not shutdown after 15 min of inactivity. On 23 November 2011 13:30, Ice13ill wrote: > I deployed y

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache doesn't work

1. If you absolutely have to have all 6,500 city names for each user session, I would put them in a separate JavaScript file, stick a reference to it at the bottom of your app page, and host this file somewhere outside of GAE to save a bit of money. This file will be cached by browsers, so that ret

Re: [google-appengine] Idle instances and pending latency management advice

Well, most of my CPU usage is due to tasks background work (about 80%) and also, a large number of datastore writes influences a rise in costs. On 7 November 2011 17:29, Adrian Scott wrote: > I dropped ours from 3 to 2 minimum idle instances, and saw significant > drop in daily cost. > > 7-9 use

[google-appengine] Re: data just a bit over free quota

ze it.  That approach gives you an extra 5GB to play with, at > the cost of more latency when you need that extra data.  If you cache > everything you read from the blobstore in memcache with no expiration, > even the extra latency is practically gone. > > On Nov 1, 6:46 pm, Andrei

[google-appengine] Re: data just a bit over free quota

oglegroups.com > > [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrei > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 3:25 PM > To: Google App Engine > Subject: [google-appengine] Re: data just a bit over free quota > > I can pay that > But after Nov 7 it's 9 dollars minimum per mo

[google-appengine] Re: data just a bit over free quota

. It should be 0.3796$/year if I > calculated it correctly. > > On Nov 1, 9:43 pm, Andrei wrote: > > > > > > > > > One of the apps has 1.13Gb of data and is not going to grow > > It's non profit app > > Can I still run it for free with new pricing? &

[google-appengine] data just a bit over free quota

One of the apps has 1.13Gb of data and is not going to grow It's non profit app Can I still run it for free with new pricing? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googl

Re: [google-appengine] Maximum concurrent user requests

Well, the requests are independent form each other (threadsafe) and are only related to datastore (each request also triggers task creation for different log writes). Should't all request that arrive "at the same time" be resolved in parallel ? On 16 October 2011 20:34, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > >

[google-appengine] Re: MySQL on GAE becomes a reality ?

Is it free to use in preview mode? On Oct 6, 6:17 pm, Tim wrote: > In case anyone missed it, a full SQL database is in "limited preview" > > http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/10/google-cloud-sql-your-dat... >  http://code.google.com/apis/sql/ > > Quote:  fully-managed service that maintain

[google-appengine] Re: Typo in Official GAE Pricing Page

Hey Gregory, While you are fixing that page please divide all prices by ten, so I can come back to GAE :) On Sep 24, 12:39 am, "Gregory D'alesandre" wrote: > Thank you for highlighting, it is indeed inaccurate on the external page and > we are in the process of fixing it! > > Greg > On Sep 23, 20

[google-appengine] Re: Keep data on memcache as long as possible

You can have private memcahed http://aws.amazon.com/elasticache/ On Sep 22, 5:36 pm, yamadaag wrote: > Hello. > > I want to keep data on memcache as long as possible. > I'm planning to use cron which checks data on memcache, but I think > this way needs large list of memcache keys. > Does anyone

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine SDK 1.5.4 released!

I forgot to reply, but now it works... i didn't change anything On Sep 18, 2011 11:21 PM, "Robert Kluin" wrote: > You sure the index is identical? > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:25, Ice13ill wrote: >> I've been expecting the new datastore query improvement... >> I have a question related to t

Re: [google-appengine] URL fetch timeout bigger than 10 sec

Thank you for your response. That is the same solution i found, for both cases. I thought that backends could have helped me. On Sep 15, 2011 5:39 PM, "Rishi Arora" wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this gro

[google-appengine] Re: Some thoughts on the new pricing

But wait till November They 'll have to change the price too, so they can compete in open market Right now they can not On Sep 8, 10:29 pm, Gerald Tan wrote: > So it's a choice between higher quota for limited time, or lower quota for > unlimited time :/ -- You received this message because yo

[google-appengine] Re: Some thoughts on the new pricing

For a year http://aws.amazon.com/free/ On Sep 8, 10:22 pm, Gerald Tan wrote: > I can get free quota from VPS or amazon? > > > > > > > > On Friday, September 9, 2011 11:09:56 AM UTC+8, Mac wrote: > > so the target was 2x to 5x price increase when all is said and done. > > and if you can't make the

[google-appengine] Re: Some thoughts on the new pricing

Does not really change much What will be helpful is when google announces prices comparable to AWS On Sep 8, 8:00 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" wrote: > Here's the body of the post if you can't get to Plus for whatever reason: > > -- > > *TL;DR: New pricing postponed to Nov 1, instance hou

[google-appengine] Re: 50$ credit, is it per app or per account?

After getting 50 credit can i freeze it by disabling billing, so i can use it later? On Sep 4, 8:47 pm, Rohan Chandiramani wrote: > This is the thread your looking for : > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-appengine/HZQoLuAIZMs > > this is the original blog post : > > http://google

[google-appengine] Re: 50$ credit, is it per app or per account?

t; > neptunespride > blightoftheimmortals > jupitersfolly > > I did see somebody else post about this over the weekend but I cant > find that thread (its a little busy in there these days) > > On Sep 5, 4:39 am, Andrei wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks >

[google-appengine] Re: 50$ credit, is it per app or per account?

Thanks If I get 50 credit and disable billing, so i can enable it few months from now, will i still keep 50$ credit? On Sep 4, 2:32 pm, Rohan Chandiramani wrote: > Per app. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this g

[google-appengine] 50$ credit, is it per app or per account?

Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, v

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Suddenly started to get "Unauthorized sender" when sending emails

I had a user that contained dot in its name and worked. It also contained dash... the sender that had only a dot still triggers the error On Aug 13, 2011 1:58 PM, "bFlood" wrote: > > +1 sender has a period in it > > On Aug 13, 3:09 am, Jan Muller wrote: >> My sender address also contains . >> >>

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Suddenly started to get "Unauthorized sender" when sending emails

This sounds bad... So you guys also have a sender that worked, now it doesn't work, but other senders do work ? (that were also added to Permissions list) 2011/8/13 Jan Muller > Yes, i tried it. No results :( > Dne 13.8.2011 0:02 "Andrei Cosmin Fifiiţă" > napsal(a): &

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Suddenly started to get "Unauthorized sender" when sending emails

Has anyone tried to remove the user and then send an invitation to add it again ? On 13 August 2011 00:57, Ice13ill wrote: > I tried to change the sending user and it worked. When i changed it > back the the original one i still received the > javax.mail.SendFailedException: Send failure error.

[google-appengine] Re: Register Article on GAE

Here is another piece of info from guy who worked for Google http://rethrick.com/#waving-goodbye And this relates to GAE Speed Here is something you've may have heard but never quite believed before: Google's vaunted scalable software infrastructure is obsolete. Don't get me wrong, their hardwa

[google-appengine] Re: Register Article on GAE

Here is another piece of info from guy who worked 10 years for Google http://rethrick.com/#waving-goodbye And this relates to GAE Speed Here is something you've may have heard but never quite believed before: Google's vaunted scalable software infrastructure is obsolete. Don't get me wrong, thei

[google-appengine] Re: Register Article on GAE

There is another article about Android http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217400/Major_damages_sought_in_Oracle_Google_patent_dispute_ Does this make any difference for GAE? Probably not? On Jun 7, 9:59 am, Joshua Smith wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/07/inside_google_app_engin

[google-appengine] Re: Rudimentary New Pricing Analysis

Denis How do you know gae memcache is not part of 128 Mb? May be it is How do you know how much memcahce is available to your app, is it documented? If you look at http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/NewOverview, which is one alternative for aws, you do not need to replicate cache across all

[google-appengine] Re: Rudimentary New Pricing Analysis

If you don't mind working from shell and doing little admin go with AWS Since you are also learning more with AWS it's better for resume On May 29, 8:06 pm, Ugorji wrote: > The other threads don't address this in isolation. I'm hoping Greg can > address this in his updated document. > > *On-deman

[google-appengine] Re: Migrating away from App Engine but keeping Google Account integration

it's not that hard Google is openid provider use one of the libs http://openid.net/developers/libraries/ On May 26, 9:57 pm, Jordon Wii wrote: > Hi guys, > > (this might not be the best place to ask this.  Let me know if not) > >  I've got an app currently running on App Engine that takes advanta

[google-appengine] Re: Price comparison between GAE, EC2 & Azure

Not to mention that Tomcat 7 comes with servlet 3 support and allows async servlets for chat type of application Also you can install extra stuff like memcahed, mongodb, cassandra, xmpp server, etc on the instance On May 22, 9:56 am, Andrei wrote: > Also you forgot to mention > CloudFr

[google-appengine] Re: Price comparison between GAE, EC2 & Azure

to 1000 requests per second On May 22, 9:45 am, Andrei wrote: > There is also a micro instance, which is equivalent of around 3 goog > instances > It's 2 cents per hour, and prepaid is even cheaper > > On May 22, 8:34 am, Anders wrote: > > > > > > > > &

[google-appengine] Re: Price comparison between GAE, EC2 & Azure

There is also a micro instance, which is equivalent of around 3 goog instances It's 2 cents per hour, and prepaid is even cheaper On May 22, 8:34 am, Anders wrote: > In case this has not been mentioned already, it's important to stress the > exponential progress in price/performance in computing

[google-appengine] 90 days new price notice

In the Terms it says 4.3. Google may change its fees and payment policies for the Service with ninety (90) days prior notice. The question: did this notice start from May 15? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this

[google-appengine] Re: FAQ for out of preview pricing changes

Why can't people write their own scheduler if the they pay for instances On May 18, 12:49 am, "Gregory D'alesandre" wrote: > Hello All! > > As you've likely heard, when Google App Engine leaves Preview in the second > half of 2011, the pricing model will change.  Prices are listed > here:http:/

[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine suddenly becoming more expensive???

Dear Gregory D'alesandre Is it possible for users that already created apps in Preview, before yesterday announcement to keep quota as for Preview mode for a year or at least till the end of the year as a reward for making GAE better and helping Google find and fix bugs This will prevent us from

[google-appengine] Re: 100 emails recipients newly created applications.

No The old quota for free app was 2000, from today - 100 On May 10, 5:52 pm, Cláudio Coelho wrote: > Does this mean that after a while, an app will be allowed to send more > emails? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post

[google-appengine] new pricing - existing apps

Will existing apps on GAE be under new pricing or do they keep current quotas? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, se

[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine suddenly becoming more expensive???

Could somebody compare pricing to AWS if I am running Tomcat or Jetty? On May 10, 12:29 pm, Ugorji wrote: > Did App Engine suddenly start costing a minimum of $45 per month? > > http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/05/year-ahead-for-google-app... > > Summary: pay-as-you-go is 8 cents per hour

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Task Creation failing at a high rate since 1.5 pre release

I encountered another problem. I seamed that when a task was added to my task queue, it was added three or four times. (i believe this happened a few times). For example: at a certain action, a task is created: this task generates a document (based on some processing) delivers an email an then reco

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Task Creation failing at a high rate since 1.5 pre release

I think it will work... Retry about 5 times (eventually a few seconds between retries) will probably help. On 4 May 2011 21:26, PK wrote: > Same problem this morning. Here is the traceback I see: > > Task failed to be added to queue > Traceback (most recent call last): >  File "/base/data/home/ap

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Task Creation failing at a high rate since 1.5 pre release

I still get these errors... I can't say its a high percentage, but it's a significant rate. On 4 May 2011 19:47, Robert Kluin wrote: > I've seen a few bursts of transient errors on a couple Python apps as > well.  They seemed to have cleared up for me though. > > What percentage of task adds are

[google-appengine] Channels documentation error

I think it is supposed to be for Java app engine side not JavaScript client Quote of doc part In order to initiate the process of creating a channel, JavaScript client pages call the ChannelServiceFactory.getChannelService() method and get a ChannelService() object. Then they use the object's crea

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Problem with built in indices and lists of properties

The zig-zag doesnt try and then gives up... it just doesnt try anything... it knows exactly when the query is executed... The fail happens very quickly... 100ms aprox... Second.. i tryied with 200 limit (which is max) and works On 15 April 2011 22:04, Stephen Johnson wrote: > Hi Andrei, >

  1   2   >