[google-appengine] Re: Instance shuts down abruptly and new instance starts automatically

Sure, but I haven't received a response to the private issue for 8 days now. What can I do to get someone to pick up the issue (other than of course buying paid support)? On Wednesday, June 10, 2020 at 12:18:25 AM UTC+8, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > To solve such an issue, which

[google-appengine] Re: Instance shuts down abruptly and new instance starts automatically

I know that option, but isn't there a way to find out the reason of why an instance would shut down? I already created a private issue about a week ago and have not received any response so far. That's why I turned to this forum for help. On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 11:07:34 PM UTC+8, Katayoon

[google-appengine] Re: Instance shuts down abruptly and new instance starts automatically

Hello Ankush, But the point is that the instance is not idle and load is not high when I see it happening. The only thing I can think of it is exceeding memory limit for the instance. My instance is usually around 200-225MB. I understand that the memory limit is 256MB for an F1 instance for a

[google-appengine] Instance shuts down abruptly and new instance starts automatically

- App Engine SDK Java v1.9.80 - Automatic Scaling (Default instance - F1) My app engine instance shuts down abruptly every few hours (typically 2-3 hours) for no apparent reason. It would have just finished serving a request and the next minute a new instance is spawned by a warmup request.

[google-appengine] Re: Bigger app sizes with Cloud SDK than with AppCfg

to increase when I change the plugin from v1.3.2 to v2.2.0? On Friday, June 5, 2020 at 8:43:27 PM UTC+8, Olu wrote: > > @DFB, where did you get the information that appengine-maven-plugin uses > gcloud internally? Did you see that on any article? This GCP doc[1] has no > such

[google-appengine] Re: Bigger app sizes with Cloud SDK than with AppCfg

My builds are done using aappengine-maven-plugin, which internally uses gcloud. On Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 11:44:47 PM UTC+8, Aref Amiri (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > AppCfg is deprecated now > > and >

[google-appengine] Re: Bigger app sizes with Cloud SDK than with AppCfg

Thank you, Aref. It makes sense. I noticed that when I go from maven-app-engine plugin v1.3.2 to v2.2.0, that's when the size increases. So has the plugin switched from using AppCfg to Cloud Build? On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 at 11:35:16 PM UTC+8, Aref Amiri (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > >

Re: [google-appengine] Frequent restart of instances - App Engine Standard PHP 7.3

Hi Magnus, Did it get resolved? I'm facing the same issue. New instances are restarted and the previous one shutdown for no obvious reason. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[google-appengine] Re: Upgraded from 1.9.69 to 1.9.80 and application size increased 3 times

I did some more investigation. The size of the SNAPSHOT war actually shrunk by about 1 MB after the upgrade, but the app size shown on GAE dashboard grew significantly. In fact, the appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.9.80.jar is about 1 MB smaller than appengine-api-1.0-sdk-1.9.63.jar. I downgraded back

[google-appengine] Re: Upgraded from 1.9.69 to 1.9.80 and application size increased 3 times

Correction: I was on GAE Java v1.9.63 before the upgrade. I'm using App Engine Maven Plugin. I was on v1.3.2. I performed 'mvn clean', and this time the size reduced to 31.6 MB (still about 1.8 times the original) . I've since upgraded to the plugin v2.2.0 (latest as of now), and still the

[google-appengine] Re: Bigger app sizes with Cloud SDK than with AppCfg

Diego, > > What was the conclusion? I'm seeing a similar issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[google-appengine] Upgraded from 1.9.69 to 1.9.80 and application size increased 3 times

Today I updated Google App Engine (Java) from v1.9.69 to v1.9.80. After updated when I uploaded my app to the app engine, the app size changed from 17 MB to 52 MB. Is there a reason for this threefold size increase? Should I be concerned? Is there something I can do to reduce the size close

[google-appengine] Re: Site inaccessible at custom domain

I have resolved the issue and documented the resolution here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/LhQ2NEydn0w/tt6v0-RzBAAJ On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 7:42:34 AM UTC+8, DFB wrote: > > Suddenly 2 hours ago, my site became inaccessible at the custom domain > which

[google-appengine] Re: Custom Domain Mapping not working

mins. Please try that out. Hope it helps. DFB On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 7:39:23 AM UTC+8, DFB wrote: > > I'm having the same issue. > > My site is not accessible at the custom domain but working fine at > appspot.com as Russ mentioned. Relieved to know that it's not me a

[google-appengine] Site inaccessible at custom domain

Suddenly 2 hours ago, my site became inaccessible at the custom domain which has been working fine for years. The site is still accessible at appspot.com . I already checked with my domain registrar and they confirmed that everything is fine at their end. I noticed another person raising the

[google-appengine] Re: Custom Domain Mapping not working

I'm having the same issue. My site is not accessible at the custom domain but working fine at appspot.com as Russ mentioned. Relieved to know that it's not me alone. Hope Google fixes it soon. On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:48:52 AM UTC+8, Russ Fertig wrote: > > my app isn't responding to

[google-appengine] Re: Google Analytics showing source/medium as appengine.google.com/referral for sessions using Google Sign-In

Hi James, I'm having the same issue. Can you elaborate more on your workaround / solution? Thanks. On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 1:32:30 PM UTC+8, James Foster wrote: > > Hi Patrice, > > Thank you for your effort. I do appreciate it. What I'm really after is a > workaround, though. I don't

[google-appengine] Re: Weird Instance Scheduler

Same problem here. For last 2+ weeks, my small application, which usually would not use more than 2 instances, has been using up to 8 instances. There's absolutely no increase in traffic and nothing changed on the application side. On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:58:44 AM UTC+8, Mos wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'XXX').

Thanks Markus. I faced the same problem today and your solution saved me. On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:13:21 AM UTC+8, Markus wrote: I found the problem. After update the Eclipse Plugin forget my account data. In Eclipse und the bottom statusbar on the left border.. there is the account

[google-appengine] Re: Security Constraint works in hosted mode but on the App Engine

though. Is it a bug or something? On May 3, 11:09 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,   Maybe you've already logged in before.  Have you tried clearing your cookies or using a different browser? Robert On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 01:21, DFB harwinder.bha...@gmail.com wrote

[google-appengine] Re: Security Constraint works in hosted mode but on the App Engine

, DFB harwinder.bha...@gmail.com wrote: My GWT application is using Google Accounts authentication. I've added this simplesecurityconstraintto my web.xml file: security-constraint    web-resource-collection        url-patternds/*/url-pattern    /web-resource-collection    auth

[google-appengine] Re: Security Constraint works in hosted mode but on the App Engine

Just reflecting back on it, I'm not sure why it always worked in the hosted mode. Probably it doesn't read the files from the cache in the hosted mode, and that misled me into thinking that something was wrong with GAE. Well anyway ... On May 4, 1:52 am, DFB harwinder.bha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

[google-appengine] Security Constraint works in hosted mode but on the App Engine

My GWT application is using Google Accounts authentication. I've added this simple security constraint to my web.xml file: security-constraint web-resource-collection url-patternds/*/url-pattern /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name*/role-name

[google-appengine] Re: Data compression behavior on static files is inconsistent

Hello Noah, Thanks for your response. It makes sense, as far as the images are concerned. But why do the .js files not get compressed consistently? I noticed that sometimes the same file, in the same browser, is downloaded in the compressed format and at other times it doesn't. For example the

[google-appengine] Data compression behavior on static files is inconsistent

Hi, I developed a GWT / SmartGWT based app and deployed it on the app engine. I'm trying to optimize the performance of the app. Using firebug, I found that some static content is not returned to the client in the compressed format (even though the request header says