OpenID connect , i.e. OAuth 2.0
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jay Kyburz wrote:
>
> My users have started getting warnings that OpenID 2 is going away soon
> when logging into my app.
>
> My app uses Federated Login. Will be modified to use something other than
> openID before it goes down.
>
Also, app engine do not stick to all the version simultaneously, and only
latest version is likely to work on the server, so one should update as
soon as it releases.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:56 PM, timh wrote:
> There are lots of chnages, you should read the release notes
> https://code.googl
I am waiting for the day when Wordpress do all the above in order for it to
be compatible with Google App Engine, and not the other way around. Would
you change the car or would you change the road ? ( you are absolutely free
to choose either, but not both )
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Va
Simplest is to do it in task queue in sequence
On Oct 19, 2013 7:45 PM, "Kaan Soral" wrote:
> I've implemented routines to handle contention at a large level, a custom
> pipeline implementation, there also also basic checks to prevent
> overwriting an entity.
>
> However there are some operations
nice idea, will remember it, thanks of sharing
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM, ZeroCool wrote:
> OK, after desperately trying to contact google for a few hours.
> I disabled my app and re-enabled it.
> Guess what, it brought it back to life.
>
> If anyone has a similar problem in the futur
You can set default from command line.
On Aug 10, 2013 10:38 PM, "Jeff Schnitzer" wrote:
> We do zero-downtime rolling deployments. Our solution is to deploy to a
> new version each time (identified by a timestamp), warm up the version, and
> then switch. If you have a high-traffic app you may ne
Is there any Open Source Python Shopping Cart that I could use to
host my store on google app engine ? ( +1 if it is being used in live
site..)
I would need a lot of customization ( and hence can contribute a lot back ).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
https://bitbucket.org/cloudsherpas/ferris-framework/overview
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
its reaching 1B$ very soon.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> Lots, and lots.
>
> This appears to be a loaded question.
>
> ** **
>
> Better questions are things like “how much revenue does AppEngine
> generate” and “how many requests a day does it serve”
>
> I don
is there a simpler way to avoid creating document for search every time
a new datastore record created ?
can not it be possible to have database model
ndb.searchModel which automatically do so ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" gro
if data is independent of each other , yes you can easily reach that speed
of writing.
and unless it is ok to lost a one or two data point ( in case of
memcache eviction ) i recommend directly writing to datastore.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Bradley Ford wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I hope I can
its undefined behavior. they never said it will not work or prohibited.
they said undefined.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Richard Watson wrote:
> I'm sure it's very unlikely to work reliably. If you need that, until
> Google makes a policy change I'd suggest using something like Pusher.
> ht
try bitcoin
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Kaan Soral wrote:
> Getting money from a user is EXTREMELY hard, especially if you are outside
> US.
>
> If you want frictionless payments, you should probably get a merchant
> account for credit cards, you cant get CC info to Appengine, for that
> rea
I found google high replication pretty stable.
what I would like to know is to what level you have tested it to return
entity which was saved successfully in database ?
i.e. if entity was stored succesfully. if i get it by id after 10 years,
what chance that it will be returned correctly ?
--
It prohibits "writing". It allows reading anyway you want.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:02 AM, GregF wrote:
> Appengine does not give you access to the filesystem. You will need to use
> either the datastore or the blobstore to store local information.
>
> Cheers!
> Greg.
>
>
> On Saturday, 29 Septe
Thanks. Did it. Worked Great.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Timofey Koolin wrote:
> You must convert all in PEM, than open each of they in text editor and
> copy all content into one file.
>
> it says invalid key when trying with combined crt, it work with single crt.
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012
it says invalid key when trying with combined crt, it work with single crt.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
> You may want to concatenate the files into your certificate.pem for extra
> compatibility with various browsers.
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:22:33 PM UTC
newbie here.
my ca provide 3 .crt format certificates.
and I am allowed to upload only one pem via google apps ssl tab.
one is sslca.crt, another is addexternalcaroot.crt and one is mywebsite.crt
I converted mywebsite.crt to pem and uploaded and it works with SNI.
what do I need to do with oth
i have copied pasted and used it, but since google itself uses it for their
"cron" scheduler, its quite nice if its included by default.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Anand Mistry wrote:
> It is a small, pure-python library, so it is unlikely we will add it to
> the production runtime.
>
>
>
antlr3 is available in sdk but not in production.
is there any possiblity of including it in production ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscrib
does ndb supports projection query ?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alfred Fuller wrote:
> I agree :-), the doc update is in progress.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Sun Jing wrote:
>
>> Thank you, it works. I think the document should be updated:
>>
>> https://developers.google.com
i think this happen only when they release a new version of app engine. so
it linked to app wise upgrade.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:30 AM, vlad wrote:
> I have been screaming about this for a looong time. The offcial position
> of GAE team is - we don't guarantee on time execution. Even though t
2012 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gopal Patel
> wrote:
> >
> > I would also like to know if someone out there is making highly complex
> > system on top of google app engine ? ( By Complex, I mean, lots of cross
> > en
We all know that google app engine scales and the prince's wedding website
was a prime example of that.
I would also like to know if someone out there is making highly complex
system on top of google app engine ? ( By Complex, I mean, lots of cross
entity transaction, more than hundred different t
nice findings. ( if you are doing this for sanity check on html, markupsafe
can be of lot of help )
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, stevep wrote:
> I hope this may be helpful as others look for 2.7 optimizations. I
> just ported to 2.7 threadsafe: true. Am running on an F1 instance with
> very
if request/second dropped, nothing could be done. latency has nothing to do
with request/second. if nothing else, it will increase the instance count,
google have no control over request/second.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:47 AM, thecheatah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am noticing that the latency on my HR
you mean, always have one instance more than required ? ( who is going to
pay for that ? ) , and is not minimum idle instance same thing ?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tapir wrote:
> I means "why not to conquer it instead of trying to avoid it?".
>
> If you can't conquer it, please lower th
thats a good thing. I am back to nil cost for my website because of that. ;)
its caching. google uses edge caching for static content and if you have
cache header defined.
for all such request your log will show 204.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this or is
in recent change, setuptools added as third party library to google app
engine.
I am wondering, what is the use case for it in google app engine ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-
not every four year, you will be safe for year 2400 , 2800 and on...
( and thanks for pointing out, I will now take more care )
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Andrin von Rechenberg
wrote:
> At least it's not your birthday today :)
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Kaan Soral wrote:
>
>>
i think google is already doing something similar and it will not disclose
how they manage it.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:07 PM, pradeep wrote:
> Hi Google guys,
>
> I have some thought in the Request Queue Management
>
> * any of the first call takes more time to server and if the age of
> inst
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5770
this is imp too in traffic splitting and in general multi-threading.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Andrin von Rechenberg
wrote:
> Watch out though. The Channel API will be broken when you use traffic
> splitting!
>
> See: http://c
+1 , i wonder if they are already doing it ?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:28 PM, voscausa wrote:
> I'll add another patent. Make it inteligent, let it learn from previous
> requests.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> T
you can compare a massive game to a version control system, with each file
being their players, with state of game being state of directory.
with that said, just study how git works. http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Kaan Soral wrote:
> My initial idea was to keep
can you do something like git ?
whenever there is state change, update hash and save as new entity.
that way, you will have whole chain of event, current state, etc.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> Even worse than the communication issue is the fact that there's no
>
afaik, development server do not have any quota.
and instead of clearing datastore ( unless thats the operation you are
testing ) , delete the datastore file directly on development server.
that will be way easier.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:37 PM, andrew wrote:
> A few days ago I wanted to dele
as per this blog post
http://blog.golang.org/2011/12/from-zero-to-go-launching-on-google.html
he created a doodle on google's homepage and used go lang on app engine.
although that post was about go lang,
it would be nice if someone from google have exact performance data on the
app on app engine
it works if added as assets, it will not work if it is external url.
.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:47 AM, PizzaPanther wrote:
> When converting HTML to PDF, it is noted that external CSS is not
> supported which is cool. My question is what about images? Is the IMG tag
> supported? How about ba
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6550
star this issue. which allows options available in online admin console to
be incorporated in app config file.
--
and awesome release. conversation api rocks. does it support image inside
html ? ( will test it anyhow, but official an
does python sdk now works with py2.7 ?
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've just uploaded the 1.6.0 Prerelease SDKs:
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list
>
> Please note that new features are not available in production until the
> final re
I think $2.10 also count towards resource usage if I am not mistaken. so gae
is cheapest for app that is costing $2.10 to run.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Gerald Tan wrote:
> You're forgetting the $2.10 per week (~$9/month) minimum charge, which is
> actually annoying for small apps that o
nice idea but you are not counting the "search for an entity that is 3+
months old" data stores cycle
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Rishi Arora wrote:
> In my app I have a an Entity group that stores user activity data - like a
> high level application log of user activity. This is the En
you could also created derivative entity which combined both country and
state and query for it == operator.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Thomas Wiradikusuma <
wiradikus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have this entity:
>
> House {
> - country
> - state
> - address
> - owner
> - ...
>
its preview , actual sdk is not out yet...
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Muneer Malik wrote:
> I see the SDK is being updated but eclipse plugin is still showing 1.5.2 ..
>
> any reason for that ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Pr
you cant. the option is only for maximum idle instance. it took me a lot of
time and graph to grasp the idea of maximum idle instance. lol.
i would rather like maximum total instance option which can be set to any
number from 1 to infinite. would and like to use latency to actually
control the cos
on the lighter note, man, I wish my app cost $1/month to run. ;)
what are you using ? java or python ?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Andrin von Rechenberg wrote:
> Hi there
>
> We are a bit confused. From all the threads we see on this mailing list
> it seems that it is expensive to run sm
1.2Ghz is not our app runs on. That's reference point to calculate cpu
charge. i.e. if a 3.6Ghz server take 300ms to response, it will be charged
as 900ms. but thats history now, no more cpu. only instance time.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Raymond C. wrote:
> As far as I can remember, I dont
dont know what we are using, but we are charged for 1.2Ghz intel single
core. and 128MB Max before instance get killed.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:50 PM, GR wrote:
> What are the memory and CPU specs of the frontend instances we are paying
> for?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are
initially I misunderstood the maximum idle instances. it exactly means that.
if your app set to 2 idle instance. your app will have as many instances as
it needs. but if traffic reduces it will kill rest of the idle instance
apart from last two AFTER their 15 minutes cycle over. so if there is a
sm
+1 exact my questionfor blobstore api you need biliing
I have set max instance to 1 and latency to 15s. thats *almost* ensure free
quota.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Joe wrote:
> After seeing all the uproar regarding the new pricing model, I'm wondering
> how it will affect small a
I remember some talks that, google is going for instance-hour for
better predictability for resource allocation and revenue.
here are my free suggestions, that can make app engine looks bit good
-- keep free quota but keep small amount for an app. i.e. 5$ per year per
app. ( that way, you wil
anybody try to tweak idle time and instances to see how much it changes ?
I have low traffic site so can't tell muchbut people with apps that uses
lots of cpu hours, the result of tweaking idle time and instances is
interessting
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Raymond C. wrote:
> For mine
it will be great if you can do git for deployment also. 10-20% of all my
deployment fails.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM, wrote:
> If you have trouble viewing or submitting this form, you can fill it out
> online:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFhvYzA2SFlIRFZadmw1YVp
as of now this only works on appspot domains. for custom domain, https is
still "coming soon".
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Robert Kluin wrote:
> Are you testing on the development server or production?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 16:43, thstart wrote:
> > to my Python app.yaml
AFAIK , questions are filtered based on ontopic or offtopic and not if they
are technological or not. so if there is a different category for appengine,
I think most of the related question can be answered there, and they need
not be a technological question.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Vivek
you can but it will not work. try typhoonae ro appscale.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:19 PM, jhatzics wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if I can deploy an application in my Windows 2003
> Server using GAE for commercial purposes?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> --
> You received this message becau
Any first hand experience with Go Language on GAE ? Is it fast ? should I
consider moving to it for my new project ( which is not going to releasing
until it comes out of experimental status.. ) ?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Nick Johnson (Google) <
nick.john...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Walee
if that is not allowed , is reply-to header allowed ?
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appe
and in the meanwhile aws and ms both making incoming data completely free...
( lets see how google behave when their own game of "free" played against
the. )
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM, zdravko wrote:
> Stephen, thanks for basically repeating what you already said because
> the first time I
i think you can create google account with your own email id, and that's
what he is using.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:29 AM, JH wrote:
> drakaal at digerat.com ... ? are you using google apps to access + ?
> I'd like to but I can't get profiles yet...
>
> On Jul 1, 7:52 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
sharing information across user is requirement for most web
applications. What I do is , create a stringlistproperty with
people who have right to write on that entity. sometime even use
parent property if large number of people are sharing the model.
things get complicated when there is very compl
thanks for correction.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Gopal Patel wrote:
> > there is exabot crawler crawling my unfinished website
> continuouslywhat
> > can I do to stop it ? I have disallowed everything in robot.txt
there is exabot crawler crawling my unfinished website continuouslywhat
can I do to stop it ? I have disallowed everything in robot.txt .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng
you can use in-instance caching. It may not be always up to date but will
give you extreme speeds.
http://appengine-cookbook.appspot.com/recipe/decorator-to-getset-from-the-memcache-automatically/?id=ahJhcHBlbmdpbmUtY29va2Jvb2tyngELEgtSZWNpcGVJbmRleCJAYWhKaGNIQmxibWRwYm1VdFkyOXZhMkp2YjJ0eUdnc1NDRU
nice information, thnks ! did't know they use same space but always used
datetimeproperty.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Rodrigo Moraes wrote:
> Just FYI, DateProperty, TimeProperty and DatetimeProperty all store the
> same type in the datastore: a datetime representation. The difference is
>
is it doing this on production ?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> This code
>
>
>
> storedate = db.TimeProperty(auto_now_add=True)
>
>
>
> is storing
>
>
>
> 1970-01-01 07:24:59.747331
>
>
>
> In my data store. The Time looks right, but the date is Jan 1 1970.
>
>
>
> A
http://appengine.google.com/a/awfullychocolate-bj.com
2011/5/10 Gordon & Teresa
> The same:(
>
> 1. open http://appengine.google.com
> 2. log in as gor...@awfullychocolate-bj.com (the domain admin account)
> 3. unauthorized message again:-( (top-right corner display "
> gor...@awfullychocolate-b
i have same question. my guess is , it is single index.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:59 PM, someone1 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are indexes between different namespaces shared or is a new index used
> for each namespace? If it is the latter, then is the 200 maximum set
> for the App or each namespace, or d
the key you get when testing oauth is different from what you will get for a
approved app for google apps.
and that same key can be used for all application that are installed
my their respective
domain admin.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Felipe Teixeira
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How i can get secret
OR, data is deleted immediately but the calculation of data occurs
once in a while, so it will take time to reflect on stats ?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Simon Knott wrote:
> Deleting with the admin interface carries out a "soft" delete, which
> schedules a background "hard" delete. You'l
use parent property.
http://dl.google.com/io/2009/pres/W_0415_Building_Scalable_Complex_App_Engines.pdf
this article best explains many to many huge number of relations.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Kyle Mulka wrote:
> My guess is that the ListProperty does have a maximum. Even if it
> didn
lol...its for one day onlyso use it or it will not be there tomorrow... :P
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:04 AM, pdknsk wrote:
> I've got generous free quotas in my dashboard :D
>
> Datastore API Calls 0% 7,405 of 9,223,372,036,854,775,808
> Okay
> Datastore Queries
you can specify output encoding as jpeg and than can use the quality
argument in composite function in image api.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Yonatan Maman wrote:
> I have an Image, which I want to reduce its size (in bytes).
> I tried to do it by resizing the image dimensions but the size (l
HR is REPAIRED version of MS I think.
AFAIK , they have built the moving facility in to the admin console.
you have to make your ds read only for a while and move the data ,
upload your app and again stop read only mode.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Ice13ill wrote:
> 1. My datastore has abou
yes, ooc , whats your applicatioin ?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Kaan Soral wrote:
> Out of curiosity, can you send a link to your application? - please
>
> On Mar 23, 8:49 am, "Adam Green (AutoComplete+)"
> wrote:
>> Hi - I'd appreciate any help on finding the best solution to our scale
>>
@brandon , that doubled my confidance in google... :D
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> Running HR rather than MS...
>
> Looking at the last 45 days (and my numbers are getting higher)
>
> I serve 700k requests a day, 21M Requests a month. And have 46 Errored
> requests whi
@Timofey I think , the day you touch max limits by google, you will have
people to worry about scalability while you enjoy nice holiday on galapagos.
2011/3/17 Brandon Wirtz
> Nothing is infinite, Google is More infinite than most things.
>
>
>
> *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto
if you are giving away *free source code* so others can use your system to
create their
sites, yet it can work. but "free" and "unlimited" is not possible, i think.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:55 PM, rekby wrote:
> Hello, I want create hosting system on google appes engine platform. It’ll
> be many
+1. custom login pages/sign up links redirection etc are pretty old
problems that haven't been solved...
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, jay wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please allow me to rant for a few minutes about some very annoying
> problems I've recently had with logins and authentication. Hop
urlfetch google.com and check date header... ;)
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Ng Ka Ka Eric wrote:
> Hi Raymond,
> Just watched the video. Thx for pointing this reference.
>
> I really didnt expect that the machines are not time synced (can be off for
> 40mins?!) are there any technical difficu
what is this s~ doing there anyway ?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:21 AM, djidjadji wrote:
> I had a problem that the python 1.3.8 SDK was unable to write in a
> 1.3.7 SDK datastore.
> They must have changed something because SDK 1.4.1 was able to
> read/write a 1.3.7 SDK datastore.
>
> 2011/2/11 Mat
81 matches
Mail list logo
