You might like to consider Restlets [1] as well - they are well suited
to this sort of routing and dynamic naming.
[1] http://www.restlet.org/
On 16 May 2011 10:28, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> I would have all products have a URL pattern like
> mysite.com/product/mini-shop-vac (or similar). Then,
Amazon's limit is 5TB, not 5GB - although you can only upload it in up
to 5GB parts for a single PUT.
On 10 August 2011 02:51, Joshua Smith wrote:
> Does this mean there is no limit at all? (We've bumped into Amazon S3's 5GB
> limit now and then, so having an alternative which was unlimited would
It seems the cat picture was the clincher.
On 17 August 2011 09:36, Mario César wrote:
> I have goose bumps.
>
> → http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4639#c17
>
> -- Mario César
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App
Frankly I never even look at or depend upon the Google App Engine
System Status. I monitor my individual apps using Pingdom and other
internal tools.
On 26 August 2011 11:08, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> I too have problems with the status page.
> Also I feel some different things should be monitored.
>
Great stuff Per - and you have an interesting application there. It
makes me wonder whether it would be worthwhile setting up a central
shared wiki somewhere so we could all contribute our best practices.
I'm sure many of us (I know I do) have some best practices scribbled
down internally that many
OpenID service has also been down for us for about 6 hours or more.
On 15 September 2011 21:12, Brian Immel wrote:
> Same here... Started within the last day for me.
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 15, 3:26 am, GK wrote:
>> Same here.
>>
>> I have starred the issue.
>>
>> On Sep 15, 12:58 pm, Tom Newton wrote
I also opened a production issue also:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5907
It's been down for around 10 freakin hours for us. Anyone using Google
to login to our site (i.e. 90% of our users) cannot login.
On 16 September 2011 14:42, Jan Zawadzki / Hapara
wrote:
> Open
All,
Adding www to the front of the google OpenID claimid seems to fix or
work around the issue. Have a look at my issue for an example - I have
added another comment.
On 16 September 2011 15:08, James Broberg wrote:
> I also opened a production issue also:
>
> http://code.goo
Jeff,
This made me smile as we did the exact same thing. Split the maxmind
database in 3 and reconstituted the file in code.
We initialise the database in a warm up task so it gets loaded into
memory. It's quite speedy after that (but it does take up a chunk of
memory)
cheers
James
On 7 Octobe
Very interesting.
I wonder how many writes/second it can do.
-James
On 7 October 2011 09:17, Tim wrote:
>
> In case anyone missed it, a full SQL database is in "limited preview"
> http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2011/10/google-cloud-sql-your-database-in-cloud.html
> http://code.google.c
Fun while it lasted...
On 18 October 2011 01:21, Francois Masurel wrote:
> You're totally right, GAE doesn't seem to be reachable anymore.
> Francois
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To view this discussion on the we
Hi Pamela,
If you are serving up the images straight from your blobstore then it
just uses your appspot domain (or whatever you have CNAME aliased it
to). The common pattern is you implement your own blob download
handler.
If you are using the getServingUrl function you will get the funky
high pe
Memcache performance for my app has gone down the tube. Gets and sets
that used to take 10-20ms are now taking seconds, making it
significantly slower than just going straight to the datastore:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6167
On 22 October 2011 18:54, Eurig Jones w
Sounds familiar:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5790
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6167
On 25 October 2011 20:16, jon wrote:
> Memcache for our app is back now.
>
> According to the log, memcache write operations started throwing
> com.goog
on I got is different).
> However there's a common pattern whereby an app seems to be assigned a
> memcache "service provider" and if this provider misbehaves the app
> will be stuck with it instead of getting reassigned a new, healthy
> replacement.
>
> On Oct 2
Are premier accounts actually available for early sign-up as stated in
the original message? I shot an email to
appengine_premier_reque...@google.com as instructed and have heard
nothing back for 4 days. Not very premier so far...
On 11 September 2011 09:04, Rob Smith wrote:
> This is some much n
Tip: Don't depend on memcache working 100% of the time because it
won't. We see outright failures and deteriorated performance from time
to time.
If you code with this mindset these errors can be just an annoyance
rather than a catastrophic failure,
On 5 November 2011 09:14, Carter wrote:
> We g
We see this every couple days...
On 4 November 2011 19:28, Clement Pang wrote:
> Just started happening recently, instances cannot spin up after 80s.
> Sometimes it works but sometimes they are just stuck. Anybody else who
> has seen this before (or is seeing it now)?
>
> Failed startup of contex
SES, Dynect email, many others to choose from.
On 11 November 2011 07:36, JH wrote:
> I've had a lot of success with Amazon SES. I switched when I noticed
> a lot of GAE email being flagged as spam and google employees on this
> very group said they really do intend to become a mass email platfo
We already built one. However we don't encode on GAE obviously...
Once we update our Ts and Cs to reflect the new GAE AUP we should be
ready for your lascivious videos:
http://www.metacdn.com/
On 15 November 2011 13:57, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> Time to start building my competitor running on Googl
---Original Message-
> From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Broberg
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:43 PM
> To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: New Acceptable Use: Porn?
&g
FYI - Premier tier comes with a free mermaid costume. You are totally
missing out.
On 23 November 2011 06:42, Gregory D'alesandre wrote:
> Your desire for a mermaid costume is already a frequently discussed topic
> internally...
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
Pro-tip anyone not facing this issue, I'd advise against doing a new
deployment. We weren't seeing this issue, now we are since we deployed
today (Java, HR).
On 9 January 2012 09:15, Amy Unruh wrote:
> Mos (and others),
>
> The issue is being actively investigated; we'll be sure to update th
A small caveat to the workaround posted on the issue:
I happened to add a new css file to my application, and it is
returning "Content-type: null" for the newly added css file, despite
the explicit mime mapping in web.xml.
However, my existing css files still have the correct mimetype.
On 10 Jan
Great. Can the new SDK get pushed to the maven repo promptly also?
Thanks,
James
On 12 January 2012 12:21, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> There's a new version of the Java SDK available for download. You can get it
> here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/det
Restlet is great. They have a version especially for GAE
http://www.restlet.org/
On 18 January 2012 11:24, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
> What sort of load time did Jersey add for you? When I last tried it, I didn't
> remember it was particularly bad.
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Chris wrote:
>
You have probably hit this bug:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6655
Make sure you have the latest SDK (1.6.1.1) which addresses this issue.
On 24 January 2012 12:16, Phil McDonnell wrote:
> After deploying I've noticed that sometimes our css completely breaks in a
> u
Your use case is perfect for the task queue. We use a similar model:
get a request then fire off a task to log some stuff to the database
and jam a value in memcache if required. This way control is returned
back to the user as quickly as possible.
On 24 January 2012 08:07, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
I noticed datanucleus-appengine 2.0.0-final has been released also:
http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/downloads/list
Was this part of 1.6.2? If not, when will it be part of the main SDK package?
On 1 February 2012 15:56, Chris Collins wrote:
> Is it possible to download the blob of
Also please make sure it hits maven central in a timely manner.
On 2 February 2012 09:47, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> Would you be sure to doublecheck that 1.6.2.1 gets into the Eclipse
> repo? 1.6.1.1 never seems to have made it. There was something that
> looked like an update to 1.6.1 but it did
I think it's due right after GAE for Cobol.
On 3 February 2012 10:27, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Bruno Antunes wrote:
>> are any plans to include EJB and java EE stack in GAE??
>
> You're joking, right?
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subs
everything else is cool, but java EE in gae would be awesome!
>
>
>
> 2012/2/3 James Broberg
>>
>> I think it's due right after GAE for Cobol.
>>
>> On 3 February 2012 10:27, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Bruno Antunes
Sure would be great to know the queue lengths for instance...
On 3 February 2012 18:22, Robert Kluin wrote:
> By the way, this is something I've asked about a number of times as
> well. I'd love to be able to get the same stats presented on the
> dashboard.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3
Use Amazon SES and save yourself the heartache.
On 9 February 2012 17:21, Robert Kluin wrote:
> Yes, it frequently happens.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:51, Kaan Soral wrote:
>> Is it still the same? Are emails sent from gae marked as spam?
>> Thanks in Advance
>>
>> --
>> You received this
What you describe will work - are you on Java or Python? In Java,
Filters are very effective for this task.
On 13 February 2012 14:56, Kaan Soral wrote:
> HTTP is great, easy to test on SDK, but https is a pain, SDK doesn't support
> two IP's.
>
> I am thinking of building an app that will only u
Did you check the current memory utilisation of each app when you ran the test?
On 13 March 2012 08:41, Kyle Finley wrote:
> Has anyone noticed a dramatic difference in Cold Start times when using
> different AppIDs?
>
> I recently changed the AppID for a project that I'm working on and there was
Jeff,
Did you try as a minimum clearing all cookies relating to your app
(eg... xxx.appspot.com or whatever your custom domain happens to be),
or for the nuclear approach, clearing your entire browser cache?
Doing the above seems to have resolved it for us.
-James
On 23 May 2012 11:36, Jeff Ton
ents
>
> to notify Google staff and to help identify and fix the issue..
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7560
>
> Best Regards,
> Raj
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:16 AM, James Broberg wrote:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> Did
One option is to use the Google or Federated login, removing the need
to store the password yourself:
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/users/overview
https://developers.google.com/appengine/articles/openid
-james
On 7 June 2012 06:37, Jessica wrote:
> I am a total newbie and wan
I'd also like to know. Don't hold out on us now :)
On 28 June 2012 06:45, Sam G wrote:
> Bump. Any word from a Googler on what this is!?
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:59:33 PM UTC-7, Sam G wrote:
>>
>>
>> This section just showed up for me in the App Engine dashboard.
>> I also heard Pag
We were happy enough to go with the SNI solution. We don't have mobile
users on our web interface, and we are yet to receive a complaint from an
irate Windows XP user.
We detect what browser and OS a client has, and if it's not SNI friendly we
show them a warning:
http://imgur.com/a/Axzur
As you
Given the voodoo required to actually *enable* the GAE edge cache I would
have thought it would be pretty easily to avoid it.
On 10 August 2012 00:19, prem wrote:
> Takashi, barryhunter, Emanuele ... Am glad I posted here, thanks for the
> suggestions.
>
> I will have to read up more on cache-co
This is a bit of a bummer. I was keen to try it out to generate PDF
invoices for customers
On 28 August 2012 02:07, Christina Ilvento wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The API will be shut off in November of 2012. When we have an exact date
> for the release we'll let you know.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Christina
Sure, we have done this with Atlassian Bamboo and GAE/J. We run tests
suites over localhost and also a GAE deployed staging environment - it's
pretty straight forward.
On 3 September 2012 12:46, Chris wrote:
> I've been asked to setup a continuous build server for a Google App Engine
> project.
Soon.
https://github.com/maven-gae-plugin/maven-gae-plugin/pull/46
P.S. the gae-runtime plugin is not maintained by google so this is the
wrong place to ask.
On 17 September 2012 10:08, Rik Scarborough wrote:
> Will the maven repository continue to be updated with for the appengine?
> 1.7.1 w
It's usually pretty quick but sometimes delays can occur in one of the
steps above. Each step depends on the prior one.
cheers,
James
On 17 September 2012 10:31, Rik Scarborough wrote:
> inline
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, James Broberg wrote:
>
>> Soon.
>
>
&g
A googol amount of dollars isn't cool, you know what's
cool? A googolplex amount of dollars.
On 12 October 2012 04:56, Vinny P wrote:
> Why stop there? Let's make it an application worth a googol amount of
> dollars (for the innumerate out there, that's 1 times 10 to the 100th
> power)!
>
> -Vin
To add insult to injury the enterprise support portal is down also.
https://enterprise.google.com/customerportal/
I'm glad I pay an extra $500/m for this.
On 22 November 2012 17:24, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> http://appengine.google.com/ 500s and All of our sites are down.
>
> ** **
>
> S
Can't get to either of my apps, or the App Engine status page. I'd file a
support via our Enterprise Support Channel but that is down too!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine
New maven plugin? How does it differ from:
https://github.com/maven-gae-plugin/maven-gae-plugin
On 11 December 2012 08:06, Ludovic Champenois wrote:
> Hi,
> We are pushing Maven artifacts the same day as the release, so hopefully
> very very soon (tm).
> You'll also notice a new Maven App Engine
This is good but hasn't been updated in a long time:
https://github.com/apcj/aws-sdk-for-java-on-gae
On 18 December 2012 07:35, Shilendra Sharma wrote:
> Hello Prachi
>
> You cannot use Threads in GAE. Here is a list of things you cannot do in
> GAE:
>
> If you want to do something asynchronously
Why wouldn't you just use Google Cloud Strorage? It's integrated (more or
less) with GAE.
https://cloud.google.com/products/cloud-storage
On 14 May 2013 20:42, xybrek wrote:
> Right, that's why I expected to be the initial response. However, if you
> want to run your own App Engine, you will d
Yes, thankfully we found out about this bug on deploying to our staging
environment, not production (we were still on SDK 1.7.7).
To add further pain, the legacy is missing
from the appengine-web.xml schema in the SDK, which means deploys will fail
with the current SDK if you want to maintain lega
same here. not using cloudflare at all.
On 12 March 2014 08:01, Rodrigo Almeida wrote:
> Same issue here. We are located in Brazil and our DNS records managed by
> cloudflare.
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:48:43 PM UTC-3, GregF wrote:
>>
>> We have several custom domains (e.g. www.schoolin
Thanks, I also filed a critical issue on our enterprise support (for
whatever that is worth...)
On 12 March 2014 08:07, GregF wrote:
> I've created a production issue here:
> https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=10687 - please
> star!
>
>
> On Wednesday, 12 March 2014 09:4
Here also.
On Nov 19, 11:15 am, nickmilon wrote:
> Same here
> App ID: geognos
> Language: python
>
> On Nov 19, 2:07 am, Zeynel wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 7:00 pm, Peter Warren wrote:
>
> > > +1
>
> > I just tried and I got 500 error
>
> > Error 500: --- begin server output ---
>
> >
> >
> > 50
Login / session *seems* to be ok. Still can't deploy.
On 19 November 2010 11:23, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> We're been working on addressing the issues.
> Besides deploy, is anyone seeing issues with login or receiving reports from
> end users about login failures? We're seeing some indications t
I wish. That would be super handy.
On 22 November 2010 22:13, Remigius wrote:
> Is there a code snippet around somewhere that uploads to blobstore
> using URL fetch?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this
GAE is fantastically suited for REST. I use GAE Java + Restlets + Freemarker
myself.
On 25 November 2010 08:41, supercobra wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> What is your best practice to develop REST on GAE?
>
> Daniel
> --
> superco...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jay wrote:
> >
gt; Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:25 PM, James Broberg wrote:
>
>> GAE is fantastically suited for REST. I use GAE Java + Restlets +
>> Freemarker myself.
>>
>>
>> On 25 N
What a clever idea. I will check it out, thanks!
On 2 December 2010 05:59, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> I'm not sure if anyone is interested in this type of capability but I had a
> use for it for my own debugging and monitoring purposes so I thought I'd
> share what I came up with especially since
Couldn't agree with Adam more. Why not use both? For MetaCDN.com we use GAE
as the "web role" / front end and do the heavy lifting (large file
replication, video encoding, etc) on EC2 instances around the globe on an as
needed basis.
On 3 December 2010 08:09, Adam Sah wrote:
> I'm a *very* longt
Great! What's the ETA for the SDK in Eclipse? The plugin is at 1.4.0 but the
SDK bundle for Eclipse is still 1.3.8
On 3 December 2010 07:14, Ikai Lan (Google)
> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Version 1.4.0 is officially released! Documentation will go live shortly.
> In the meantime, check out our b
"Change budget" gives you the option to switch it on.
On 6 December 2010 06:07, Barry Hunter wrote:
> Its mentioned in the blog post:
> http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2010/12/happy-holidays-from-app-engine-team-140.html
>
> Or on the 'billing settings' page of the appengine console as Joshua
I don't really get why you want to use OpenID if you are limiting your
users to Google & Google Apps accounts?
cheers
James
On 5 December 2010 20:54, AmaltasCoder wrote:
> Ok, a bit more explanation:
>
> The problem with creating Login URL's like mentioned above is that
> even yahoo.com etc. st
tion, which will probably also be OpenID, to use both Google
> and Google Apps accounts from the same application. Otherwise you are
> restricted to either 1) only Google accounts or 2) exactly one Google
> Apps domain.
>
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
&g
Restlet client *should* work also.
2010/12/22 José Miguel Bataller :
> Hi Robert,
>
> I am going to have a look to the URL Fetch Java Api.
>
> Thanks for the info,
>
> Jose
>
> On Dec 20, 8:53 pm, Robert Kluin wrote:
>> Hi José,
>> Yes, you can consume REST webservices using an App Engine app.
Sounds great. Would it be reasonable to expect that read latencies would be
slightly better due to the datastore being more highly replicated?
On 6 January 2011 10:17, Ikai Lan (Google)
> wrote:
> By the way, I should mention that there is no Java SDK. This is *almost*
> completely a server side
Slightly OT but the roadmap could sure do with an update. A couple of
those "Features on Deck" are already in the current SDK.
On 4 February 2011 07:55, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> In general, we don't make comments on upcoming features. You are welcome to
> check the roadmap for updates:
> http:/
ppengine.blogspot.com
> Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:20 PM, supercobra wrote:
>>
>> +1 for updating the roadmap.
>>
>> -- superco...@gmail.com
>> http://supercobrablogger.blogs
This was a nice article on storage options for GAE:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-gaestorage/?ca=drs-
On 7 February 2011 07:08, Ernesto Karim Oltra wrote:
> I use Google Docs currently in my projects to give my clients the
> control over their files: list, rename, delete, move
pingdom is handy also.
-James
On 11 February 2011 04:55, Calvin wrote:
> ereporter can send you a daily email with a list of exceptions that have
> occured on the site:
> http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/python/recording_exceptions_with_ereporter.html
>
> --
> You received this message
I'd recommend any/all app developers to go over and have look. I don't
want to get all worked up on something that hasn't happened yet but
some of the price points mooted in this survey are positively eye
watering. I'm happy to put my name to the feedback I left and I'd be
curious to see what other
Hi folks,
Just set up a new dev environment on Linux with an existing codebase
of mine and came across an odd error I hadn't encountered before.
Has anyone seen the below error? I'm fairly certain memcache is the
problem, not appstats, as I get a similar "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
alwaysUseFiel
It was a dumb missing jar error, nothing to see here.
On 11 February 2011 19:33, James Broberg wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just set up a new dev environment on Linux with an existing codebase
> of mine and came across an odd error I hadn't encountered before.
>
> Has anyone se
I seem to recall in another HR migration thread one of the googlers
(Ikai or Nick) mentioning they could redirect an old app-id to a new
app-id upon request.
On 15 February 2011 16:34, Robert Kluin wrote:
> Just a note: you won't be able to reclaim the app id if you delete it.
> If you want to k
Yes, and you can check the request domain by looking at the Host
request-header field.
On 22 March 2011 09:09, Roberto Saccon wrote:
> Just implement a billing solution, then the user can add your app via Google
> Apps to his custom domain. And in case your user does not pay, you serve
> differen
SendLabs is another option:
http://dyn.com/enterprise-email/sendlabs-solutions
On 23 March 2011 09:57, Jamie H wrote:
> Ikai,
>
> On that note, do you have any services besides SES that you
> recommend? SES works well with GAE however you must slowly up your
> quotas, forcing you to send some m
I noticed that too. Is this the naked domain support we have been
waiting for, or some sort of workaround?
On 31 March 2011 03:36, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> I just thought I would point out that sometime within the last several
> months (possibly quite a few, I don't look often) Google added the
>
Just out of interest what was the symptoms? Did the hostname not
resolve, was it getting routed to appengine but service was refused,
etc?
On 4 April 2011 09:36, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> That's not viable long term... Jeff Probst is not going to like me sending
> all of his users to JeffProbst.apps
80 matches
Mail list logo
