That's excellent news! Let's hope it lasts. Please let me know. Thx.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Bernd F bernd.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just want to let you know that the app, including the new memcache
code, survived the first night.
On 3 Okt., 02:31, Stephen Johnson onepagewo
You don't mention if you have threadsafe on. If so, you might be
experiencing some sort of deadlock or something with the way you are
creating your JCache on every request. I'd try moving away from JCache and
accessing the MemcacheService directly. I create a MemcacheService object
for each thread
very much for your suggestion!!
On 2 Okt., 23:24, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't mention if you have threadsafe on. If so, you might be
experiencing some sort of deadlock or something with the way you are
creating your JCache on every request. I'd try moving away
That's easy. You are not supposed to return a value in the finally block
since it overwrites any previous return values and also any exceptions that
are thrown. Return statements in a finally block are a big NO-NO.
Stephen
CortexConnect.com
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, gk
So the answer is false. Forgot to actually state that.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
That's easy. You are not supposed to return a value in the finally block
since it overwrites any previous return values and also any exceptions that
are thrown
Sounds like you need to add synchronized to the schedule, thus every 1
minutes synchronized, to get it what you want to do if I'm understanding
you correctly.
Stephen
CortexConnect.com
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:38 AM, dimi dimitri.beck...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I define my cron job with
Great! Glad it worked for you.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, dimi dimitri.beck...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Stephen, works like a charm!
I don't really understand the explanation about synchronized in the manual,
so I didn't try it out.
But it works,... as long as the request doesn't
My guess is that Google is interpreting them as static files and Google's
infrastructure is handling them before it reaches your app. So, read up on
excluding static files so they aren't served up by Google's infrastructure
at http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html
Also,
If you're using HRD and using STRONG consistency, you can increase the speed
of the get by key by using EVENTUAL consistency. Of course with the possible
ramifications that incur with using EVENTUAL consistency.
Stephen
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Steve Sherrie st...@wasteofpaper.comwrote:
That's only for idle instances but if they are actively serving request due
to a denial of service which is Brandon is talking about then you will be
charged. There definitely needs to be a maximum setting.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:54 AM, prgmratlarge yossiele...@gmail.com wrote:
Quoting from
I mean a Maximum Active Setting (not the idle setting which is useless
against a denial of service attack).
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
That's only for idle instances but if they are actively serving request due
to a denial of service which
, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com wrote:
I would think that we can still specify an upper limit for instance
hours but some clarification would be nice.
On Sep 2, 7:59 pm, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean a Maximum Active Setting (not the idle
budget. No need to worry about
that.
On Sep 2, 8:23 pm, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
There still needs to be a maximum. A daily rate can still be exhausted by
a
denial of service. Worse yet when AppEngine has issues such as datastore
issues, memcache issues, task queue issues
You definitely can do queries by your keys. I'm not a Python person but it
looks to me like your problem is that you've forgotten the = part of the
query so you get the _slides objects because _slides is _blocks. You also
get faq, default, shipping etc. because the underscore character is less
I meant __key__ not __key.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
You definitely can do queries by your keys. I'm not a Python person but it
looks to me like your problem is that you've forgotten the = part of the
query so you get the _slides objects
I meant _key__ not __key++. Damn fingers.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
I meant __key__ not __key.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
You definitely can do queries by your keys. I'm not a Python
Your welcome. Glad to be of help!
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:20 PM, S.Prymak spry...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Stephen! You are totally right!
That's solved my problem! That was my stupid, stupid assumption about
string comparision algoritm :(
--
You received this message because you
Uh...perhaps you might want to say what the error is or per chance even a
stack trace or should we get out the crystal ball.
Stephen
www.cortexconnect.com
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Sundi sundi...@gmail.com wrote:
i am trying to append charcters to the
I don't know if this is it but your problem could be that you are using
setters to set first and last name which is the way you are supposed to do
it (so that the enhancer can find all places where properties may be
modified) but you are directly setting the student property instead of using
a
A File object isn't really the file, it's a reference to the file and you
can use it to get its associated metadata (permissions,size,etc.) The
example Ikai is referring to creates a new file on disk which isn't allowed
on AppEngine so this isn't going to work. Nicolo, perhaps you can create
your
Brandon, did you try making your object transient by using the makeTransient
call? Not sure if that would do the trick for you or not. Just curious.
Stephen
www.cortexconnect.com
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Brandon Donnelson
branflake2...@gmail.comwrote:
The workaround for GWT HashSet
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
A File object isn't really the file, it's a reference to the file and you
can use it to get its associated metadata (permissions,size,etc.) The
example Ikai is referring to creates a new file on disk which isn't
I wasn't sure detachCopy would work but I figured makeTransient should. Glad
to see detachCopy does the trick for you!
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Brandon Donnelson
branflake2...@gmail.comwrote:
Wow, that worked, your my best friend :)
How I got it to work:
if (j != null) {
Good to know. Not sure what all the low-level difference between the two is
either but glad one of them worked.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Brandon Donnelson
branflake2...@gmail.comwrote:
Ah, I thought they were both the same at first, so after you said that I
tried pm.makeTransient(j);
Hi,
The local dev stores session information in memory so you won't get the
NotSerializableException on local dev because the local dev doesn't need to
serialize the objects that are in the session. I think that may also be the
case with glassfish and tomcat if you haven't set up a database to
Change your query to something like this:
Query query = pm.newQuery(select ek from + UploadedContent.class
.getName());
Where ek is the entity key name you use in you JDO class. For example,
mine is defined like the following:
@PrimaryKey
@Persistent(valueStrategy =
I use the low-level datastore to do the delete by keys.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Carter Maslan car...@maslan.com wrote:
thanks; what delete do you use?
It looked like deletePersistentAll() accepted only entities (rather than
key values)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Stephen
It is done.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
So I saw this in my Google Alerts earlier, and I thought, what the heck,
people ask development questions on Yahoo Answers?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110726102419AAFUzgy
Can someone
There is a 1MB limit for entities in the datastore so if your data fits
within that limit than the datastore is a good option. My app stores all its
data in the datastore including videos, audio files, images, pdf's, etc. I
started it before the blobstore existed. So, if your data is greater than
If your data is never more than 32K in size then the datastore is definitely
the way to go. Way easier and simpler IMHO.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:30 AM, GeorgeS sxoutt...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen, thanks for the information!
I had started to put the text into a Datastore but somehow the
bump once it has run several times.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
You'll probably want to look at and test backends where you can pick your
processor speed to see what kind of performance you can get. I think the
front-end instances are configured
Hi Ruoshui,
You're app can use https regardless of whether or not you use any type of
login authentication. https causes the http data transmission to be
encrypted, it doesn't have anything to do with actually logging in to your
app or not. So, when your python app makes the http request, replace
This does seem to be a conundrum. I'll offer up an idea for those instances
where this behavior is of concern. It's not a great solution but if you need
to guarantee that a transaction definitely succeeds and your transaction is
idempotent then maybe this or some variation will help.
First off,
Oops, I meant that your transaction is NOT idempotent, duh.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
This does seem to be a conundrum. I'll offer up an idea for those instances
where this behavior is of concern. It's not a great solution but if you need
I should have mentioned that the re-fetch should be done in a transaction,
which should take away the eventually part since from what I've gathered I
think you're reading directly from the master transaction log. As for the
continuous timing out due to datastore issues then you'd have to fallback
Your welcome Ruoshui and thank you for the code sample Ernesto, I use Java
on the server side so wouldn't have been much help with the Python.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:03 PM, liu ruos...@aquamw.com wrote:
Hi Ernesto and Stephen,
Thank you both so much. Your comments clear up my confusion
Hi Fred,
Lists/Sets implement the Iterable interface, so create any list type
(ArrayList/LinkedList) you want and then just add them to that.
ListEntity entities = new ArrayListEntity();
while (more entities) {
entities.add(entity);
}
datastore.put(entities);
Stephen
CortexConnect
The thing to note is that doing this won't affect any of the current data.
You'll need to either delete the current data and re-upload with those
properties set to unindexed or you need to create your model with the
properties set to unindexed and then iterate over the current data and
retrieve
Hi,
I'll take a stab at trying to help you out. I think I understand what you
are attempting to do.
Using mapreduce:
The way I would do this is to create (if you don't already have one) is a
composite index on your four fields of name, phone, address and fathername.
With that being said, since
JSP's get converted to servlets before execution, so when your using JSP's
you're using servlets. Many people, myself included, use servlets for the
business logic and use JSP's for the presentation (generating the html). So,
in my servlets and filters I'll determine if the user is logged in, has
Hi Jeff,
I believe that with the new pricing that may have already happened. If you
keep your app warm with no one using it you're going to be paying for it.
A lot of users will probably want their instances to shutdown faster rather
than stay up and be either billed or use up their free quota.
You can use STRONG consistency on HR and if you get by key then that should
work with what you describe. There was just a discussion on this and you can
see a related post by Ikai which may also help you from a reply of his to
this other discussion:
Hi Kyle,
You should read the link I provided with Ikai's discussion. Gets by key with
EVENTUAL consistency on HR can go to a replica datastore that may not have
the latest info. Also, see the discussion we just had where this was
discussed. Subject was ReadPolicy.Consistency.EVENTUAL under HR The
do a get(), put(), or a transaction, you will always
see the most recently written data.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/overview.html
On Jul 10, 5:41 pm, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kyle,
You should read the link I provided with Ikai's discussion
I don't use JPA, but the way I understand it is that a get is by key which
can also be a batch get by key. Whereas a query, queries for the entity keys
using an index and then gets the entities by key. So, the way I understand
it is below, but this is just my understanding so I could be wrong:
. An eventually
consistent fetch goes to the fastest datastore node and returns
whatever version it has.
Robert
On Thursday, July 7, 2011, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pete,
Yes, I've also tested this and the speed improvement is VERY
noticeable. With the way
I'm assuming this is on production not dev? Do you have sessions-enabled
true/sessions-enabled in your appengine-web.xml? Are you seeing the
sessions persisted to the datastore in _ah_Session?
Stephen
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Alex Dobjanschi
alex.dobjans...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I've
LOL! Hopefully it will be happy music!
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Gregory D'alesandre gr...@google.comwrote:
Heh, watching that almost makes me want to have dramatic music play the
first time you look at the side-by-side bills :)
Greg
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Stephen Johnson
, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Robert,
This is what I kind of thought but I didn't want to go that far in a
statement without official clarification. If that is the case then I think
the documentation should clarify this then because under the Usage Notes
Or you could view it the other way and that EVENTUAL consistency is 10x
cheaper :) You can also use both consistencies in your app. Do you really
need STRONG consistency for every query and fetch. For example, if your
selling products, does the descriptions of the products change that often. I
Glad to be of help!
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:24 AM, BarrenTeam barren8...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you again Stephen! :)
We have solved many of our doubts thanks to your answers :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view
Have you tried using the two parameter getObjectById that takes the
JDO entity class type as the first parameter which I would presume
(but not verified) then doesn't need to inspect the supplied string to
determine the entity kind?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Carter jcmas...@gmail.com
I'd suggest posting some real code for us to help you make a determination.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried using the two parameter getObjectById that takes the
JDO entity class type as the first parameter which I would presume
Hi Pete,
Yes, I've also tested this and the speed improvement is VERY
noticeable. With the way that the documentation explains the
difference between the HR datastores STRONG and EVENTUAL settings you
would assume that getting by the key value would be the same speed
because according to the
@Extension(vendorName=datanucleus, key=gae.pk-name, value=true)
private String counter;
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd suggest posting some real code for us to help you make a
determination.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Stephen
To avoid automatic property index creation with JDO use the following
on properties you don't want indexed.
@Extension(vendorName = datanucleus, key = gae.unindexed, value=true)
One caveat is that if you plan to use that property as a composite
index then you'll need to have that property
the workaround will be to replace each
java.util.logging.Logger with my own, serializable logger?
Best,
Dave Donohue
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, make sure that anything referenced by anything that is put in to
session is also
Hi,
Even though you only have one composite index on __key__ (desc), there
are also other indexes you may have. For example, every __key__ has
an ascending index and every property that you have indexed (which may
have been done automatically for you unless you specified otherwise
for example if
Again, I'm not sure why your Loggers are instance variables, but I
just make mine a final static variable of that class
private static final Logger log =
Logger.getLogger(Whatever.class.getName());
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome
Just to be clear, then since it's static it won't be serialized and
this would solve your issue as well.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, I'm not sure why your Loggers are instance variables, but I
just make mine a final static variable
In your astrotution.com apps control panel, you need to remove Google
Sites, then add the App Engine and specify your appengine appspot.com
domain. It will take a while for google sites to stop responding and
app engine to start responding.
Stephen
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Test37
Do you have sessions enabled in your appengine-web.xml file??
sessions-enabledtrue/sessions-enabled
Stephen
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:49 AM, David Donohue drdono...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello! We have spent many hours working on a Wicket-based Java web
application for Google App Engine.
Sorry can't help much since don't know what's occurring inside these
methods. My suggestion was only based on you stating that Session is
null but no way to know for sure if Session is really null. Perhaps it
is something that is being put into the Session and that is coming
back out as null. Are
Why not use a single int or long value (depending on the number of
String values) where each bit position determines if that value was
modified? Bit 0 for value1, bit 1 for value2, etc. Then if you want to
know if any of the values have been modified, for example, in a query
then just query to see
Glad you were able to solve it.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Dado Colussi dado.colu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 June 2011 11:36, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
If private.der is in binary format then why are you reading it in as a
String using Scanner???
Because I'm
If private.der is in binary format then why are you reading it in as a
String using Scanner???
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Dado Colussi dado.colu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2011 14:51, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but I think you
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but I think you need to base-64
decode your string.
Stephen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Dado Colussi dado.colu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have generated an RSA key pair with OpenSSL, and I am successfully using
it in App Engine Java SDK 1.5 on Mac OS X
Glad that did the trick!
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Mikael Hakman mikael.hak...@gmail.com wrote:
That did the trick. Thank you very much Stephen.
Mikael
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-
appeng...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
Did you try 1.67 hours? For some reason I think sometime long long ago
it was brought up that decimals could be used to solve a problem like
this. Not sure though.
Stephen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
Cron every 10 minute
Increment Cron Counter
Do you have
sessions-enabledtrue/sessions-enabled
in your appengine-web.xml?
Stephen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Mikael Hakman mhak...@dkab.net wrote:
In a GWT RPC servlet I use HttpRequest.getSession(true) to create a session.
In another place in the same servlet I check for session by
You can do it several ways. The best way IMHO is to show the form and
the captcha together and they fill in the form fields and the captcha
and submit both together. Or as your question implies, you want a
two-step process for some reason where they fill in the form and then
you show a different
If you set up your domain through Google Apps then remove Google Sites
from the account where you set up your domain name and add App Engine
to that account specifying your appengine id. I think that if you used
Google Apps to add your domain then your DNS settings should be fine,
but I can't
Log into your apps account:
www.google.com/a/YOURDOMAIN.com
On your dashboard remove Google Sites, then click Add More Services to
add your App Engine account
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Steve steve.flenni...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the idea of switching some settings so I can use my
Cool. Your welcome.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Steve steve.flenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. I was able to remove the default site and add my app engine id
to my new domain.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java
, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vik,
Post your code where you're creating the ByteArrayOutputStream and
creating the PDF with it. It'll be more helpful then what you've
posted. I'm a little concerned you still don't have this part correct
since you're still using out
As a theoretical exercise and not knowing for one second if this would
in anyway work, but...
Don't use Python. Use Java. Store file in instance memory. Should be
able to serve it with latency of 25ms or even less. So 40 requests per
second for just one thread. Should be able to get at least 20
Hi Brandon,
Different Steve here. Anyway, when I mentioned in a different thread
about indexes, you also have to count your property indexes as well.
For each property that you have indexed (and these wouldn't show up in
your configured indexes) you have two indexes defined: one ascending
and one
.
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Johnson
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:42 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Still confused about Storage reported for
billing
built a test case, do you happen to know if all types write/read
at the same speed assuming they are the same size?
-Brandon
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Johnson
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11
If u store objects in the Session they must be serializable because
this data gets saved to the datastore in _ah_session so that it can be
shared across multiple instances, etc. However the dev server doesn't
need to do this since it's only one machine and it keeps the session
info in
Your welcome.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Steve Fisher dr.s.m.fis...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen,
Thanks for the explanation
Steve
On 18 May 2011 21:45, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote:
If u store objects in the Session they must be serializable because this
data gets
I use JDO but I don't use the built in relationship handling. I manage
my own relationships and use JDO just for the property/entity mapping
part of it. It seems to make life a lot simpler when trying to get
around these types of situations. If you can make the Orders not be
children of the
);
System.out.println(Sucessfully Sent mail to All Users);
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vik,
Post your code where you're creating the ByteArrayOutputStream
You need to make sure that the class implements the
java.io.Serializable interface. There are no methods to this
interface:
class MyClass implements java.io.Serializable {
}
Stephen
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Steve Fisher dr.s.m.fis...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a small application (using
Greg,
Still not clear on the datastore costs. For this you say, This means
the cost of your queries will be tied exclusively to the size of your
result set. Is this the same whether you return just the keys (keys
only query) or also the entities. It seems like it should not be the
same since a
I have two questions on the Java version of mapreduce since the docs seem
pretty sparse.
1.) Is it possible to use mapreduce over a namespace and if so, how do you
configure it?
2.) Is only inputing entity keys and not the entire values supported on the
Java version and if so, how do I configure
Thinking out loud...What's strange about that issue (not this current one
but the one from the past) and the supposed solution is that until just
recently with the introduction of the threadsafe property supposedly only
one request could executing at a time and you can't create your own
additional
Hi Ashley,
This isn't the way I would go about structuring this if I'm understanding
the way you've set up your classes. There are a few issues right away that I
see. For one, if you have a couple thousand Order children under the Account
parent and you call getOrders() in your addOrder() method
Ah, I missed the point about it being tasks and didn't realize the
threadsafe only applied to user requests and not tasks. If indeed that was
the case.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Juha K juha.kosk...@gmail.com wrote:
The datanucleus issue has a comment Then, when my tasks run in
You're writing the PDF as your web page output. Use a ByteArrayOutputStream
instead.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote:
Hie
Just a little question. I am using this pdfJet thing.
The requirement for us is to create a pdf and then mail it to a user.
So i am done
You should be able to use the RequestDispatcher object to do what you want
but you'll have to have mappings in web.xml for each of the servlets your
forwarding to for instance MyGalleryApp would have mappings that all start
with /MyGalleryApp/ (or something similar) so GalleryServlet would map to
. Please advise
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
You're writing the PDF as your web page output. Use a
ByteArrayOutputStream instead.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:16
://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Vik,
Call toByteArray() method on ByteArrayOutputStream when finished with
creating PDF and then
MimeBodyPart attachment = new MimeBodyPart
://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Stephen Johnson
onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote:
The code snippet is from the link I provided. Replace the attachmentData
in the code snippet with the byte[] array returned from toByteArray(). You
do not convert
I would have all products have a URL pattern like
mysite.com/product/mini-shop-vac (or similar). Then, map
mysite.com/product/* to a ProductServlet or similar that generates the
product page. You can find out what product they are viewing by using
getRequestURI() method and stripping off the
Well, the Datastore Statistics don't add in any indexing, etc. whereas the
quota details does add that in.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Brandon Wirtz drak...@digerat.com wrote:
This isn’t a big deal, but the numbers don’t sum what I’d have expected…
Both of these are about 2.5x in
Uh...check your spelling. You've got vph-epr and vph-erp
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:23 AM, horid121 horid...@netkiller.com wrote:
Hello~
When I deploy to Google App Engine, I received a error message.
Error message:
java.io.IOException: Error posting to URL:
Uh...check your spelling. You've got vph-epr and vph-erp
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Juha K juha.kosk...@gmail.com wrote:
java.io.IOException: Error posting to URL:
https://appengine.google.com/api/appversion/create?app_id=vph-epr
version=6
*But*, it's exist now.
There's no guarantee that both those threads are running on the same
instance. They can be on two different machines in two different data
centers.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Samuel Erdtman sam...@erdtman.se wrote:
Hi
I have created an application that works fin in the eclipse app engine
I'm confused. I have an HR app and this is what I see when I look at the
headers using Firebug for one of my images. You're saying this should be
different?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Francois Masurel f.masu...@gmail.comwrote:
What is rather strange is that cache headers work perfectly
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
