[google-appengine] Re: Unknown project in GCP Console

Totally same for me. On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 1:11:06 PM UTC-4 guana...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi there. > > I have noticed recently that I have in my GCP console 2 projects that I > did not create and I guess came with the account. I have been using GCP for > the last 4 years, was at th

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine costs rocket in recent months?

ike, users will suffer. > > -Joshua > > On Sep 2, 2021, at 10:48 AM, Tapir wrote: > > > The costs of my projects rocketed from $5 to $50 in the previous months. > Anyone else also got the same experience? > > My websites are very small. > > -- > You rece

[google-appengine] Re: 20,000% cost increase in July

The same for me. 10x more cost increase in Judy and August. On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:34:34 AM UTC-4 Viktor Bresan wrote: > Guys from Google claimed that they didn't change anything. I suspect the > scheduling algorithm that launches additional instances has changed. For me > the solution

[google-appengine] App Engine costs rocket in recent months?

The costs of my projects rocketed from $5 to $50 in the previous months. Anyone else also got the same experience? My websites are very small. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivi

[google-appengine] Re: A question about app.yaml settings.

Thanks for the info. On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 12:15:11 PM UTC-4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Hello Tapir, > > Manual scaling specifies the number of instances that continuously run > regardless of the load level. This allows tasks such as complex > i

[google-appengine] A question about app.yaml settings.

If I add the following two lines in app.yaml, then will Google charge me for non-free instance hour usage? manual_scaling: instances: 1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[google-appengine] Re: Is GAE standard billing method changed?

On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 1:22:00 PM UTC-4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Unfortunately, I cannot post a picture here. You might not see the "load > page" feature, as this is not yet generally available. It should appear on > the Quotas page under "IAM and Admin", where many App E

[google-appengine] Re: Is GAE standard billing method changed?

On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 3:41:07 PM UTC-4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Hi Tapir. > > If you navigate to the Quotas page, click on the quota of interest, you'll > see on the column on the right a series of "load usage" links. Do you refer >

[google-appengine] Re: Is GAE standard billing method changed?

On Monday, May 4, 2020 at 1:04:49 PM UTC-4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Hello Tapir, > > There are no changes in GAE billing recently, which may have affected you; > this, depending on how recent you mean. > > You can change daily quota limits for your a

[google-appengine] Re: Is GAE standard billing method changed?

On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 9:05:19 AM UTC-4, Tapir wrote: > > I just received my last month billing, which is much higher than previous > months. > When I tries to visit the quota page for day to day in a project, > I found the page is gone. > So now, I totally lost in which da

[google-appengine] Re: Is GAE standard billing method changed?

BTW, it looks the "delete app version" button is gone now, so I can't delete old versions of my apps now. On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 9:05:19 AM UTC-4, Tapir wrote: > > I just received my last month billing, which is much higher than previous > months. > When I tries

[google-appengine] Is GAE standard billing method changed?

I just received my last month billing, which is much higher than previous months. When I tries to visit the quota page for day to day in a project, I found the page is gone. So now, I totally lost in which day my project spent more than the free quota. One of my billing accounts even charge me f

Re: [google-appengine] Re: F1 instances now have 256MB memory?

128M is not enough to run a simple Java web app. On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 5:25:26 PM UTC-4, Jeff O'Neill wrote: > > Hi George, > > My interest in upgrading is faster processors. I have some fairly > computational tasks that I would like to get done more quickly. > > My F1 instances have 2

[google-appengine] Re: "appcfg.py rollback" doesn't work now.

The last update succeeded. Maybe it is a fault from my side, but I can't confirm it. On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-4, Tapir wrote: > > Today, I uploaded a new version for one of my GAE project. > For some reason. the uploading was stopped before it was fini

[google-appengine] Re: "appcfg.py rollback" doesn't work now.

On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-4, Tapir wrote: > > Today, I uploaded a new version for one of my GAE project. > For some reason. the uploading was stopped before it was finished. > When I uploaded it again, it prompts > > Error 409: --- begin server ou

[google-appengine] "appcfg.py rollback" doesn't work now.

Today, I uploaded a new version for one of my GAE project. For some reason. the uploading was stopped before it was finished. When I uploaded it again, it prompts Error 409: --- begin server output --- Another transaction by user is already in progress for app: s~, version: v2. That user can und

[google-appengine] Re: Is App Engine Standard environment acts as a CDN?

In my impression, static files are dispatched through CDN, dynamic pages are not. On Friday, August 31, 2018 at 11:17:08 AM UTC-4, Nagaraj Prabhu wrote: > > Hi, > >I have deployed a web application in the standard environment in > python project. I would like to know whether Google App E

[google-appengine] Re: Two of my gae projects has been disabled billing but still gets charged.

On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 4:32:13 PM UTC-4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > After you close your billing account, we will bill you for the usage you > accrued prior to cancelling your service. This bill will be the last bill > you receive, unless you reactivate service. You may gath

[google-appengine] Two of my gae projects has been disabled billing but still gets charged.

I have disabled billing for the two project at May 3rd. But their quotas pages still show they are charged at May 4th and May 5th. Is this a bug of GAE? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[google-appengine] Re: did App Engine change instance scheduler algorithm in the past month?

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 2:03:04 PM UTC-4, Kyle Finley wrote: > > Tapir & Jordan, > > For what it's worth, I've notice the same issue. I spoke with billing in > the beginning of April, but at the time they weren't aware of the issue, > and since it was

[google-appengine] Re: did App Engine change instance scheduler algorithm in the past month?

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 12:04:04 PM UTC-4, Jordan (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > You should investigate how many instances each of your applications used > in March and compare that with the amount in April. If you changed your > applications' scaling settings it would have directly af

[google-appengine] did App Engine change instance scheduler algorithm in the past month?

>From the "Usage History" page, I found that the instance hours of all my apps increase much. Comparing to previous months, there are no big traffic changes for my apps. One of my app has only 200 pageviews each day, generally the free quota is enough to cover the usage, and this app is charged

Re: [google-appengine] Re: ? How to implement managed SSL for a pre-existing domain mapping.

On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 6:01:07 PM UTC-4, Kamran (Google Cloud Support) wrote: > > Tapir, > > You can use "secure" handlers subelement to automatically redirect HTTP > requests to the HTTPS URL with the same path. For more information on > this

Re: [google-appengine] Re: ? How to implement managed SSL for a pre-existing domain mapping.

king off only one > domain in the table? Are the buttons still disabled then? > Yes, I only checked one domain, but the button is still disabled. > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Tapir > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:32:16 AM UTC

Re: [google-appengine] Re: ? How to implement managed SSL for a pre-existing domain mapping.

On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:32:16 AM UTC-4, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 7:54:13 PM UTC-4, Kamran (Google Cloud > Support) wrote: >> >> >> No. Updating the CNAME to point to *ghs.googlehosted.com >> <http://ghs.go

Re: [google-appengine] Re: ? How to implement managed SSL for a pre-existing domain mapping.

On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 7:54:13 PM UTC-4, Kamran (Google Cloud Support) wrote: > > > No. Updating the CNAME to point to *ghs.googlehosted.com > *shouldn't interrupt your HTTP service. > how long will it take effect after clicking the "Enable Managed Secu

[google-appengine] Re: many "Process terminated because the request deadline was exceeded. . (Error code 123)" errors for my go app recently

Aha, I think I found the issue. It is a bug in code. The code is modified two week ago. But it is weird that only the oldest log at April 24th prints the program panic stack traces. Other logs don't print the stack traces. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:55:18 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > &

[google-appengine] Re: many "Process terminated because the request deadline was exceeded. . (Error code 123)" errors for my go app recently

btw, the cloud log in firefox is almost unusable. It is laggy and often refreshes unexpectedly. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 11:05:30 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > The problem started happening since April 24th. > It never happened before this date. > The app is very simple and I didn

[google-appengine] Re: many "Process terminated because the request deadline was exceeded. . (Error code 123)" errors for my go app recently

The google cloud log is almost not usable in firefox. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:55:18 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > I can't get what is problem from the log: > > E GET 500 0 B 100.9 s Googlebot 2 / GET 500 0 B 100.9

[google-appengine] Re: many "Process terminated because the request deadline was exceeded. . (Error code 123)" errors for my go app recently

The problem started happening since April 24th. It never happened before this date. The app is very simple and I didn't modify it much a week before and after April 24th. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:55:18 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > I can't get what is problem from the log: &g

[google-appengine] many "Process terminated because the request deadline was exceeded. . (Error code 123)" errors for my go app recently

720651 { protoPayload: { @type: "type.googleapis.com/google.appengine.logging.v1.RequestLog" appId: "s~tapir-games" versionId: "2" requestId: "590210c200ff08698603ab0f540001737e74617069722d67616d6573000132000100" ip: "66.249.75.17

Re: [google-appengine] Re: After long time not deployed my GAE go project, I found I lost the ability to deploy a project.

On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 9:51:27 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 8:49:32 AM UTC+8, Alex Martelli wrote: >> >> Thanks Tapir for the very specific bug report wrt the -V flag -- I've >> opened an internal docs bug so my go-

Re: [google-appengine] Re: After long time not deployed my GAE go project, I found I lost the ability to deploy a project.

On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 8:49:32 AM UTC+8, Alex Martelli wrote: > > Thanks Tapir for the very specific bug report wrt the -V flag -- I've > opened an internal docs bug so my go-specialist colleagues can check out > and, as needed, correct the docs here. > > Alex &

[google-appengine] Re: After long time not deployed my GAE go project, I found I lost the ability to deploy a project.

On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 4:01:43 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > I would say Google cloud product are very great, but the docs is a mess up. > > I searched how to deploy a go gae project, I got three links which use > different methods: > 1. https://cloud.google.com/appen

[google-appengine] After long time not deployed my GAE go project, I found I lost the ability to deploy a project.

I would say Google cloud product are very great, but the docs is a mess up. I searched how to deploy a go gae project, I got three links which use different methods: 1. https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/go/tools/uploadinganapp 2. https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/flexible/go/quickstar

[google-appengine] Re: Will AppEngine autoscale if current instance(s) don't have enough memory?

I have a Java GAE project on F1 instances. Its instances use more than 200M memory at most time. Google never close these instances. :) BTW, the memory consumption will be much smaller by using Golang. I'm porting this Java project to Golang now. On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 4:07:05 AM UTC+8, A

[google-appengine] Re: The Future of Java and Python on GAE

IMHO, App Engine should only keep one language, Golang. And remove other ones, or at least remove Java. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to go

[google-appengine] Re: Pricing for a AngularJS front-end / Java backend app?

The cost of AppEngine java projects is much larger than AppEngine golang projects. To avoid the cold start problem. java GAE project need more instances than golang projects, for golang projects have no the cold start problem. Don't use java for your AppEngine projects. - by an experienced GAE

Re: [google-appengine] Re: "One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google"

On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 8:41:07 PM UTC+8, Alejandro Casanovas wrote: > > I will also want to make a claim for all those early users of App Engine > which are joining and trying to catch up the professional world using this > tool. > > It really seems abandoned to me. At least if you

[google-appengine] Re: "One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google"

On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:11:15 AM UTC+8, Emanuele Ziglioli wrote: > I would find hard to disagree: > > *IBM, Google, and Oracle are all equally at pains to deliver a message >> that makes them uniquely attractive. In this regard, Google's inability to >> recover from the botched roll-o

Re: [google-appengine] doesn't App Engine send Content-Length header for static content now?

Advisor > Chicago, IL > > App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Vinny P > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Tapir > >> wrote: >> >>> My Flash app will load a static

[google-appengine] Re: doesn't App Engine send Content-Length header for static content now?

btw, the same problem for another 50k size file. On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 7:03:44 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > My Flash app will load a static file (about 300k) in my app engine app. > It uses "int (100 * event.bytesLoaded / event.bytesTotal)" to calculate > the loading progr

[google-appengine] doesn't App Engine send Content-Length header for static content now?

My Flash app will load a static file (about 300k) in my app engine app. It uses "int (100 * event.bytesLoaded / event.bytesTotal)" to calculate the loading progress. This works well for a long time. But for past several months, the progress always is shown as 0%. The reason for the problem is eve

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

r-the-cloud.html) > > and go to http://cloud.google.com for more information. > > @tapir: Last year at Google I/O 2013, we > launched<http://googledevelopers.blogspot.com/2013/05/get-started-with-google-cloud-datastore.html> > ( > http://googledevelopers.blogspot

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

schreef Rafael Sanches: >>>> >>>> Not being updated doesn't mean it doesn't work properly. >>>> >>>> GAE + java is definitely frustrating, but some of your statements are a >>>> bit too broad ;) >>>> >>

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

> alive. > When we launched one of our products, we had one engineer working on the > back-end side (99% AppEngine). We had a few hundred daily active users. > Then our product became very successful and we reached 5 million (!) daily > active users. We still only had one engineer

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

s, and too slow startup on GAE. > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, February 21, 2014 5:39:17 AM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >>> >>> Have you tried playframework? They have optimizations to make your life >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:03:43 AM UTC+8, Jay wrote: > > Tapir, I really do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Tim > was sharing his thoughts and you come back with childish stuff like this. > You are asking people to contribute their success stories to your oth

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael > > wrote: > >> The scheduler logic >> > > > Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael > > wrote: > >> The scheduler logic >> > > > Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 6:48:31 PM UTC+8, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tapir >wrote: >> >> $5 per day for 2000 users? and it is cost effective? Really!!! >> > > You really need to look up the law of Diminishing Returns

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael > > wrote: > >> The scheduler logic >> > > > Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:11:08 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: > > >> What the data all you provide exactly prove GAE is expensive! >> Your sense is not a typical common sense. >> Bill Gates will still think GAE is cheap if the F1 instance is charged >> with $1000 per day. >> > > What on earth are

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:31:53 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: > > So based on a running cost less than 3% of revenue, then this app is > REALLY REALLY REALLY cheap. > Sorry, 3% is just the average value for the hosting world. It is not cheap at all, it is just general. I know many websites the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

please provide your pageviews per day, is it so hard? > > T > > > > > >> >>> Just my 2c worth >>> >>> T >>> >>> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:54:54 AM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: >>>> >>>> &

[google-appengine] Re: Ok, I want to create this thread for a long time. --- Please share your GAE success stories!

@timh, could you post your story here? On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:40:32 AM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > Hi, your story doesn't need to be a success. > Just descript your App Engine experience here from the technology and > business view. > > > On Friday, February 21

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 5:32:07 AM UTC+8, Mahron wrote: > > I think app engine pricing is pretty fair. The money you may save by > managing custom servers you will soon loose with time and health which are > both priceless (if you do it yourself that is). > Yes, I also really think GAE

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

all for prove GAE is cheap or not! Is it difficult to do this? > > Just my 2c worth > > T > > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:54:54 AM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:52:40 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

uld be cheaper, it beats up your 46x thread :) ) > ? not very understand this. Do you mean using 50 GAE instances to handle the 50 RPC calls at the same time? The cost would be 50 x 15 minutes! :) > > On Friday, February 21, 2014 7:58:16 PM UTC+2, Tapir wrote: >> >> >&

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

our fate is controlled by scheduler instead of yourself. :D > On Feb 21, 2014 12:47 AM, "Tapir" > wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, February 21, 2014 3:29:37 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tapir wrote: >>&

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 1:10:09 AM UTC+8, Kaan Soral wrote: > > Tapir, out of curiosity, are you a form of an improved internet troll sent > from the future to troll these groups? (Just kidding) > > Anyway, if those 2000 users pay 49$/month, for example, and the daily >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 1:10:09 AM UTC+8, Kaan Soral wrote: > > Tapir, out of curiosity, are you a form of an improved internet troll sent > from the future to troll these groups? (Just kidding) > > Anyway, if those 2000 users pay 49$/month, for example, and the daily >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Snapchat

On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:52:40 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: > > Just for the record, the app I was talking about might only have 2000 > users, but it is by no means a simple application. > > I has approximateley 30 different models. Fully defined with RBAC > security model scoped down to parts

[google-appengine] Re: Ok, I want to create this thread for a long time. --- Please share your GAE success stories!

Hi, your story doesn't need to be a success. Just descript your App Engine experience here from the technology and business view. On Friday, February 21, 2014 1:28:05 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > When you share you story, please DON'T just say "I happy with GAE, bla bla >

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Friday, February 21, 2014 3:29:37 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tapir > > wrote: > >> So for the app with warmup problems, to avoid the warmup the problem, the >> real free hours would be only a little more than 4 hours, right? &g

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Friday, February 21, 2014 3:29:37 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tapir > > wrote: > >> So for the app with warmup problems, to avoid the warmup the problem, the >> real free hours would be only a little more than 4 hours, right? &g

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Friday, February 21, 2014 2:58:35 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Tapir > > wrote: > >> Resident instances do serve traffic. All the traffic of my paid python >> app are served by the resident instance. Part of the traffic of my

[google-appengine] Ok, I want to create this thread for a long time. --- Please share your GAE success stories!

When you share you story, please DON'T just say "I happy with GAE, bla bla bla ..." without any technology and business details. (for example, the pdf ones listed at https://cloud.google.com/customers/, ;D) I hope you can show as many of your app technology and business details as possible. Fo

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

es that by running their own thing. > > Read more: http://www.playframework.com/documentation/1.0/gae > I don't think they can bypass the core GAE SDK lib. The problem of GAE Java is at the core GAE SDK lib. > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Tapir >wrote: &g

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Friday, February 21, 2014 1:11:12 AM UTC+8, Kristopher Giesing wrote: > > Because by definition, resident instances don't serve any traffic. That > means you are eating up 24 instance hours of idle time each day, leaving > you only four hours each day to serve traffic. > Resident instances

[google-appengine] Re: Is blobstore likely to be deprecated in the near future?

On Friday, February 21, 2014 12:29:18 AM UTC+8, Hang Zhao wrote: > > Since blobstore file api was deprecated for a short while, I'm thinking if > I should migrate those api to cloud storage or still use blobstore api to > store a bunch of images. Also since cloud storage is not free, I might >

[google-appengine] Re: A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:11:17 PM UTC+8, Andrei Volgin wrote: > > @Tapir > > Move your app to Compute Engine and stop complaining. You can still use > the Datastore, but your instance will cost you much less. > I will. But not now. App on GCE still needs a GAE inst

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

Could you provide datastore APIs for using on GCE without a GAE instance? It would be great if it is possible. On Friday, June 21, 2013 3:21:06 AM UTC+8, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > Fellow App Engine Gurus, > > We're happy to announce the next generation of App Engine Managed > Backends.

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

can use BigTable from GCE without GAE. > > On Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:59:23 AM UTC-6, Tapir wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:30:23 PM UTC+8, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Tapir wrote: >>&

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 7:22:05 PM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:45:43 PM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:45:43 PM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >> My app is still in the development stage. It has a small traffic now (< >> 1000 pageviews/day). >> I really need a workable configuration which will make sure it will never >> be charged more than 28 hours

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:45:43 PM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > >>> >>> >> >> My app is still in the development stage. It has a small traffic now (< >> 1000 pageviews/day). >> I really need a workable configuration which will make sure it will never >> be charged more than 28 hours

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:30:23 PM UTC+8, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Tapir >wrote: >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 7:58:54 AM UTC+8, Jim wrote: >>> >>> >>> It seems that some people want "Infr

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:49:53 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir wrote: >> >>> >>> >

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:26:52 AM UTC+8, Emanuele Ziglioli wrote: > > Great stuff > > hope you don't move to Go too soon! > Why? It is a way of no ways. > > On Thursday, 20 February 2014 03:52:33 UTC+13, Tapir wrote: >> >> >> >> On

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

t;> >> Unfortunately nobody can say that appengine makes sense price wise. It >> may make sense if it fits your taste and you like google tools. >> Price wise it's out of discussion, no matter how you put it. >> >> thanks >> rafa >> >

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:18:50 AM UTC+8, Kristopher Giesing wrote: > > I have yet to talk to a GAE user who *didn't* misunderstand this part of > the docs on first read. It's one of the most common issues people have > when they first come to this group. > > - Kris > I'm an old user o

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:26:52 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:44:35 AM UTC+8, barryhunter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Tapir >wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 6:04:15 AM UTC+8, Rishi Arora wrote: >>> >>> It really doesn't

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:43:56 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:56:51 PM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >> >> very interesting... >> >> can you tell me how you did that? in a maven build or only via eclipse? >> >

[google-appengine] Re: Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

Ok, it is the time to make the decision. I will port my java project to go. There is really part of the project depends on some java libraries which are hard to find in go world, but I can make the part as a java service on my VPS. On Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:35:05 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote

Re: [google-appengine] Min Pending Latency -- does it really do anything?

On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 6:04:15 AM UTC+8, Rishi Arora wrote: > > It really doesn't matter it a second instance kicks in to process your > user-facing requests. If your max_idle_instances is set to 1, then you're > only paying for one idle instance at any given time. Really?! Any

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:32:27 AM UTC+8, Andrew Mackenzie wrote: > > Good post Barry. Things are not so simple. How much salary for Ops guys to > keep that thing running 24x7? Sorry, I don't count this factor. For Ops at Big companies will manager more resources, I think this cost pe

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:32:27 AM UTC+8, Andrew Mackenzie wrote: > > Good post Barry. Things are not so simple. How much salary for Ops guys to > keep that thing running 24x7? Sorry, I don't count this factor. For I think this cost per Op for big companies such as Google should be sm

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

dle the request, the front end hour will not increase. > > So any problems/issues are not necessarily widespread or affect many > people especially on other language runtimes. > > T > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:50:59 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: >> >> I don&

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:43:56 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:56:51 PM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >> >> very interesting... >> >> can you tell me how you did that? in a maven build or only via eclipse? >> >

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:43:56 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:56:51 PM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >> >> very interesting... >> >> can you tell me how you did that? in a maven build or only via eclipse? >> >

Re: [google-appengine] A comparison between Digital Ocean $5 plan and App Engine B$ instance type.

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:20:41 PM UTC+8, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Tapir >wrote: > >> I don't care about if you are happy with GAE or not. >> I just want to prove the GAE compute part is much more too expensive than >>

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:43:56 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:56:51 PM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >> >> very interesting... >> >> can you tell me how you did that? in a maven build or only via eclipse? >> >

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:43:56 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:56:51 PM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote: >> >> very interesting... >> >> can you tell me how you did that? in a maven build or only via eclipse? >> >

Re: [google-appengine] Have anyone tried to port a java project with heavy framworks, such as struts and spring, to a pure jsp/servlet project?

datastoe calling will increase the warmup time much. In above example, the total increased warmup caused by datastore APIs is more than 3 seconds. Otherwaise, scanning the core app engine sdk jar will cost 0.5 second. So, @GAE_team, please optimize your datastore APIs. Done! > > On

  1   2   3   4   5   >