[google-appengine] calls through urllib2 gives 404

: A different app installed making the the type of URL request works fine? Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

[google-appengine] Re: calls through urllib2 gives 404

I just updated with a new version using urlfetch, and now it works. It seems App Engine has a problem with urllib2 which surfaced about 12 hours ago. On Jun 16, 10:15 am, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: Within the last twelve hours one of my apps, which have not been updated the last three

[google-appengine] Re: how to dynamicly generate a new class during runtime on google app engine

you should probably look into generating it dynamically purely in mem - similar to frameworks using byte code enhancement. On Feb 8, 11:46 am, Abdelrahman eid a.eid.1...@gmail.com wrote: hello all i am facing a real problem i want to know how to generate a new class during runtime using google

[google-appengine] Re: Entity groups - more the merrier? At least this paragraph in the google article says so

How groups perform depends on what (and probably more importen: how often) you do with them. Having everything in one group will cause congestion. Groups should only be used when transactions are needed Cheer Tonny On Dec 30, 8:04 pm, nischalshetty nischalshett...@gmail.com wrote: The more

[google-appengine] Transactional sequences

integrity). Any thought anyone? Cheers /Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr

[google-appengine] Re: App Gallery no longer available

I you wan't to emphasize the importance of this thread, please mark is a favorite - I tink Google Engineers are monitoring those for importance. On Nov 8, 8:53 am, Julian Namaro namarojul...@gmail.com wrote: I think a specific App Engine tag in a general Web App Gallery would make more sense

[google-appengine] Re: Versioning applications/entities

Is that version number indexed? And if, how is performance on puts (and searches on that index)? On Sep 28, 5:16 am, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: I have several apps with complex models and relationships.  Personally I have found using a version property on my models has made

[google-appengine] Re: Versioning applications/entities

I would say that's a case where you easily can be backward compatible. Then hash them at you leisure. On Sep 22, 7:46 pm, Kyle Baley kyle.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Here's one extreme example. In the original data model, the password isn't encrypted. In the new one, it is. On Sep 22, 4:41 am,

[google-appengine] Re: Versioning applications/entities

Plus you'll need to sync those data until v2 is live. On Sep 23, 5:22 am, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote: Yep you will duplicate your data,. I don't think its a good idea unless you only have a very small amount of data. T On Sep 23, 9:39 am, Kyle Baley k...@baley.org wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: Versioning applications/entities

course there is the waste of an entire index, just for recording metadata about the entity As mentioned, I hope we see some other update strategies in the thread. Cheers Tonny On Sep 20, 8:29 pm, Kyle Baley k...@baley.org wrote: We've just released the first version of our application

[google-appengine] Re: Static resources not updated?

My minds was stuck on a: myscript-x.y.z.js naming scheme, the solution you suggest is a off course much simpler to administrate. Thanks again. Cheers Tonny On Sep 13, 8:56 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: It's not trivial, but it's not hard, either. Here's one approach

[google-appengine] Re: Do we have an ETA for the resolution of ongoing performance issues.

Ditto, I have seen an unusual higt number of timeout the last 24 hours. Usually i see 2-4 a da - i think I'm past 40 by now. /Tonny On Sep 15, 7:29 am, Raymond C. windz...@gmail.com wrote: As of 10:01pm (PDT, log msg time), my app is still generating a lot of deadline exceeded error

[google-appengine] urlfetch and HTTPS since maintenance

certificate seems to be ok. Being at European Central i could be related to something introduced during maintenance last night (for me). Is anybody else experiencing problems? Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post

[google-appengine] Re: Increased CPU Time/Request after yesterdays maintenance?

I get a general 500 error for an app. Same source as yesterday - so would say it's not a coincidence. This message appears in the log: Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your request. This may happen sporadically when the App Engine serving cluster is under

[google-appengine] Re: Static resources not updated?

:-). On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: This could what was happening, since the new files was available after 5-10 minuttes (as mentioned i used curl to look). I have no customized expire times though. On Sep 8, 10:26 pm, Peter Petrov onest...@gmail.com wrote

[google-appengine] Re: Static resources not updated?

, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: I did and uploading 10 minuttes, but my static resources has not changed when i load them through the webserver? Does anybody have similar problems currently? Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[google-appengine] Re: Static resources not updated?

case, you should use cache-busters. On Sep 8, 4:26 pm, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: I did and uploading 10 minuttes, but my static resources has not changed when i load them through the webserver? Does anybody have similar problems currently? Regards Tonny -- You received

[google-appengine] Static resources not updated?

I did and uploading 10 minuttes, but my static resources has not changed when i load them through the webserver? Does anybody have similar problems currently? Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post

[google-appengine] Re: Unable to verify by SMS

, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi (I hope someone from the google team will read this) I'm unable verify my account by SMS. I get a The phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been used to confirm an account. True I've moved away from an old Google account and have

[google-appengine] Unable to verify by SMS

trying to use now (I've had the same phone number for a very long time). How do I free my phone number from the old account, so can i use my new account to upload to App Engine? Cheers Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group

[google-appengine] Re: Lucene/Compass

Not having access to the file system on GAE will prevent you from using the out-of-the-box Lucene Index implementations (which uses the filesystem). On Feb 13, 12:40 am, Patrick Twohig patr...@namazustudios.com wrote: I was curious if anybody is using Lucene and Compass and how well it works in

[google-appengine] 1.3.1 on linux

around, and is a different story - maybe I should post it later. Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

[google-appengine] Re: 1.3.1 on linux

My Bad, switching the GAE modules while the app is running is a bad idea. I'm just so used to the dynamic reload part... Cheers Tonny On Feb 15, 10:20 am, Tonny 12br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Running 1.3.1 under Linux gives me this.   File /opt/google_appengine/google/appengine/ext/db/__init__

[google-appengine] Re: Cannot use key and key_name at the same time with different values

(), 'k:%s' % name) super(MyModel,self).__init__(self, key=key, name=name, **kw) I hope this i robust enough for future updates. Cheers Tonny On Feb 11, 2:18 pm, d43m0n d43...@gmail.com wrote: I was getting the same error. It turns out that after 1.3.1 (presumably), the function from_entity

[google-appengine] Cannot use key and key_name at the same time with different values

is not visited every day. We haven't made any updates since the last time we saw it working, so what's changed? I noticed the server version says 1.3.1 in the log, but the latest stable download is 1.3.0 - i that correct? Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[google-appengine] Multiple filter requirement on the same property

() Is the default index sufficient enough, or is there some way I could help the lookup speed. The reason I'm asking, is that I have an awful lot of of timeouts on the second type of query. Regards Tonny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App

[google-appengine] Re: Only ancestor queries are allowed inside transactions

what is the type of p2 and sth? On 8 Nov., 05:04, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I got this error when I tried to run a query in a transaction, Only ancestor queries are allowed inside transactions. I have a class, C1, whose entities have no ancestors. I want to query a

[google-appengine] Re: Indexes building stuck on empty datastore

this limit of 100 indexes, i hope that's for composite indexes? or I'll eventually will get in trouble... On 7 Nov., 03:38, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote: Ah I see. Since the upper limit was reached for the number of indexes on the index upload, none of them completed building so I've

[google-appengine] Re: Support for Protocol buffers

thanks That's the solution with putting code in the project though (I should probably included the project URL). On 29 Okt., 12:38, Stephen sdea...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 28, 3:55 pm, Tonny mezz...@gmail.com wrote: Will there be official support for protocol buffers. http

[google-appengine] Re: indexed=False

How does get an re-put remove the entry from the index, isn't the index ignored entirely once indexed=False is set? On 27 Okt., 19:05, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote: Hi vanya, Any changes made to your data model classes will only affect entities which have been put since your change,

[google-appengine] Support for Protocol buffers

for protocol buffers. It seems silly putting code in my project, which is all ready installed with app engine it self (I assume it uses protocol buffers)? Cheers Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[google-appengine] Re: How does The Python datastore select the class for an entity (or: swapping classes through the datastore)?

in the app or something else? Cheers Tonny On 21 Okt., 16:37, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Tonny, The SDK maintains a mapping between kind name and class. The kind name is determined by calling kind() on your class, and defaults to the (unqualified) name of the class

[google-appengine] How does The Python datastore select the class for an entity (or: swapping classes through the datastore)?

this will be an instance of y.A, even though we've created no such instance or worked with module y in module a or the end code snippet. Magic, a bug, a feature? Regards Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App

[google-appengine] Re: datastore problem

You need tread gently with updates to your models. When you are adding new properties, provide a default value. Cheers Tonny On 20 Okt., 06:28, Tim pencil...@gmail.com wrote: first i create an entity of note(includes some fields), then i deploy it to appengine, and add some record

[google-appengine] Re: 4Mb in datastore statistic = 2,4Gb in Stored Data Resource

Thanks for the post. I had the same question (in a different post). Nice with a reply from a Google Engineer. On 20 Okt., 16:15, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Michael m...@mzlab.net wrote: Is it possible to disable automatic indexes (on

[google-appengine] Re: Mismatch between values from the new statistics page and the values from the quota page

development which are no longer in use. And/or single properties getting indexed and not needed (most single properties indexed by default) . 2009/10/15 Tonny mezz...@gmail.com: Hi With the 1.2.6 release I began looking at doing some cleanup and optimization based on qualitative data

[google-appengine] Re: Prettier values for reference keys?

Thanks :-) I'll try that Cheers Tonny On 12 Okt., 13:21, Rodrigo Moraes rodrigo.mor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Tonny wrote: in. I could write my own ReferenceProperty from scratch, subclassing Property, but I would also like a simple solution where I didn't

[google-appengine] Re: Prettier values for reference keys?

Thanks. My own experiment looked similar (your solution i more general an prettier), but doesn't this approach trigger an extra data fetch for the referred entity each time we fetch instantiate the referrer? Cheers Tonny On 15 Okt., 08:59, Chris Tan csy...@gmail.com wrote: I wrote

[google-appengine] Mismatch between values from the new statistics page and the values from the quota page

of half a gigabyte. According to the statistics page, our entities consumes 72MB. Why is there such a difference, did I misinterpret the numbers or...? Regards Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[google-appengine] Prettier values for reference keys?

ReferenceProperty from scratch, subclassing Property, but I would also like a simple solution where I didn't reinvent all ready existing functionality. Regards Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine

[google-appengine] Is anybody experiencing timeout from the data store right now?

All my requests seems to timeout right now --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[google-appengine] Re: Performance of indexes

helps but there are times that even 2 retries fail. You have to write code to deal with this situation. The TimeOut Exceptions happen for a very small percentage of Bigtable operations. 2009/7/18 Tonny mezz...@gmail.com: Hello I have a simple query like this: MyEntity.all().filter('prop1

[google-appengine] Performance of indexes

as efficient as a composite index, would the composite index be used at all? Cheers Tonny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine