ind 'User'
Things are back to normal after GAE restarts a new process. The
current plan is to restart a new process when catching such an error.
Thanks,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
works and login succeeded, but MyAuth never gets called. It appears
that AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS
has no effect.
What am I missing? Does GAE helper for Django allow a custom authentication
backend?
TIA
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Goog
They can not access your site via your domain, but they can access by
yourapp.appspot.com.
Will
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:30 AM, tomkarren wrote:
> We launched a major productivity/sync service today. I was told by
> a Chinese user that they cannot access anything hosted on appspot fr
Yes, it worked with django-nonrel. I really hope django helper have not
striped these nice features away.
Will
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:41 PM, twansc...@googlemail.com <
twansc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 27 Sep., 12:20, Will wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
ld be done programmatically
onModeuleLoad() if users were previously added to DB? This would be
more of a hack though
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send
I agree with Steve.
When I first looked at GAE in 2008, I told myself and my colleagues, 'this
is the one platform that will change the way we write our software', 'this
is the kind of products I expect to come out from a company like Google'.
Not only because of the innovat
hnical and moral wise. I
jumped in with almost no hesitation in 2008 even GAE was labeled 'preview',
because it is from Google.
Best,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group,
and a big price
increase at the end? I don't recall.
Best,
Will
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Kenneth wrote:
> As a non Google person and someone was pretty shocked about the price
> changes I have to say you're over-reacting.
>
> If your application has a average la
> but I'm also sure most users will just bite the bullet and pay up. Sure,
some will leave, but I bet most will stick to GAE.
Speaking for myself, I'm paying more than $75 per month right now, and yes,
I will bite the bullet and pay up. But the feeling is totally different.
Before, I
I cannot agree more. I have expressed the similar opinion three times since
the discussion began, and I saw some others feel the same way. But so far,
I'm convinced the change is inevitable, and I'll bite the bullet and stay,
until I have a choice.
Will
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:46
Hi all,
Some of my tasks suddenly started to report this error:
error - . The
request to API call datastore_v3.Put() was too large.
When I checked, the payloads of the tasks are usually under 200 bytes.
Anything I should look into?
Thanks,
Will
--
You received this message because you are
It's on MS datastore. The program hasn't been changed. Seems started
happening several hours ago.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Will wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some of my tasks suddenly started to report this error:
>
> error - 'google.appengine.runtime.apiproxy_erro
Less than 200 bytes.
I'd never seen this behavior until yesterday. Suddenly there are
almost 300 tasks having this error. I highly suspect the usage pattern
changed so drastically.
Will
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Greg Darke wrote:
> How large is your put to datastore?
>
> On
RequestTooLargeError raised by a task. But all the sudden, there are
hundreds, and all that I examined only want to write less than 200
bytes to the db.
Thanks,
Will
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Greg Darke wrote:
> How large is your put to datastore?
>
> On 4 August 2011 02:45, Will wrote
This is where I will look into:
The data for each task is small, but it may be appended to an existing
entity, whose size may be already close to 1M.
Thanks for all your input.
Will
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Nicholas Verne wrote:
> The RequestTooLargeError is probably referring to
Same here. Console shows ~ 3% failure rate, sharply increased volumn
of end user complains.
Will
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Waleed Abdulla wrote:
> Yes, that's been going on for weeks. Some times the error rate is so high
> the app is basically non-functional.
>
>
> On
Hi there,
I enabled Datastore Admin several months ago, and it worked. But
recently I cannot enter the page any longer. Every time I get
"Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" on the right pane.
I'm using IE9 and the appid is "bianshengbaobao".
Thanks,
Wi
10.50
-----
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
Yeah, I've set max idle instances to 3 and min pending time to 200ms.
Will see if that changes anything.
Like Raymond said, those won't change datastore writes/reads though,
and that cost is very significant.
Will
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Gopal Patel wrote:
> anybody try
Mine has been broken for a couple of months. I'm using IE9.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Jan Zawadzki / Hapara
wrote:
> Ping.
>
> Is it just our domain that's broken or is someone else experiencing
> this...?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jan
>
> On Aug 18, 9:44 am, "Jan Zawadzki / Hapara"
> wrote:
>> Any
My bill would go from ~120$ per month to ~310$ per month. I'm using
Python, M/S datastore.
With this price, I won't get 99% guaranteed up time, because of M/S.
Oh, there are periodical M/S maintenance times, and I will be paying
for them.
As soon as I get time, I'll evaluate other
Well, consider what kind of in-house lawyers they have. Looking into
the user agreement carefully, I bet you can find pretty much 'we can
do whatever we like, especially it is a three year long preview
period'.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:25 AM, zdravko wrote:
> Plenty of "bad faith" practices.
> S
ront, without 3 years of 'previewing'.
Will
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Wesley C (Google) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Srirangan wrote:
>>
>> The mode of operation seems to be:
>> 1. Attract users with free / very low cost, cloud infrastructure
&g
I've never heard of, let alone a price increase with this
magnitude in the end.
Best,
Will
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Wesley C (Google) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Angke Chen wrote:
>>
>> If all you said is true, then why the billing in the previ
I too have an app designed and being developed with the Channel API.
Seeing the new pricing plan, GAE is a no-go. It will be redesigned to
run in AWS.
My plan is to use Node.js for push. A single Node.js can support
~100K channels. Run multiple Node.js processes for further scaling.
Run a
3:39 pm, Anders wrote:
> I took a look at the Amazon prices just now. It looks quite expensive too.
> And the same dubious and opaque cost per instance concept. Both Google and
> Amazon can cram in 1000 instances in each physical server! Talk about
> hideous profit margin.
>
> The
This is very good information. Any pointer in utilizing Anycast? Any
VPS support it?
On Sep 7, 2:53 am, Andrew Cassidy wrote:
> I wasn't trying to say 'You can replicate GAE on AWS trivially", GAE is a
> massive beast that does one thing in particular that I haven't experimented
> with yet:
ces posted here, but still a very significant increase.
Regards,
Will
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> It hurt my heart to let that last post through (it was a first time poster).
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
> plus.
I use cron job to drive my backend. As soon as I put an empty handler
to /_ah/start, it started to work.
HIH,
Will
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Jay Meydad wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I fixed the yaml files however the tasks are
> still queued and not being processed.
> T
Is the MS to HR migration tool officially available?
Best,
Will
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> Oops, here is a better formatted version:
> Hey everyone,
> Just wanted to let you all know that App Engine SDK 1.5.5 has been
> released. The official ann
Alexis,
Where can I find and download the said logs?
Thanks,
Will
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Alexis wrote:
> I have not read in details previous posts but would like to share some
> figures on this subject.
> I agree that setting max idle to automatic is very expensive, in my
Alexis,
Works like a charm. Wrote a program using the data to get a good
overall picture. Thanks!
Will
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Alexis wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> I used an appcfg.py command, like this:
>
> appcfg.py --num_days=1 --append --include_all request_logs your app
Jason,
Where is the automatic migration tool? I looked all places but
couldn't find it. Is it the "Copy to Another App" button on the
"Datastore Admin" page?
Thanks,
Will
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jason Collins
wrote:
> I had a M-S app that was very regular
Thanks, Johan.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> You can sign up for the migration tool there: http://goo.gl/3jrXu.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Will wrote:
>> Jason,
>>
>> Where is the automatic migrat
Do you intend to use GAE to overcome GFW? That won't work because GAE
itself is blocked by GFW.
Or are you looking for a way to bypass GFW so that you can access your
GAE app within China? If so, you can consider reverse proxy. It works
for me.
Will
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:06 AM, peng
eue may not be the source of the problem.
The funny thing is I'm paying for this service interruption that most
likely I'm not responsible for. In the past 9 hours, the usage of
frontend instance hours is 266, while normally it would be 60 ~ 70.
Regards,
Will
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:
I'm interested. But the first question is if it complies with the premier
account user agreement...
Best,
Will
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Andrius A wrote:
> As you know we all have problems with GAE, lots of issues and unanswered
> questions and Premier Account costs a lot f
What Barry said are my concerns, too.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Andrius A wrote:
> It think it should work if we create a single organization. What are your
> thoughts?
> Would be nice to have a comment from GAE team.
>
>
> On 21 November 2011 17:08, Will wrote:
>
&
as a whole functions as expected" mess...
Thoughts?
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Same measure as Google uses for the 'entire system' uptime.
If there is a will to know, there is a way to know. Just as GAE can measure
every application's datastore read/write/small op numbers and every
instance usage down to minute.
Otherwise, why bother to put 99.95% in EULA
Greg, good to know.
Brandon, whether I will take the deal is the second step. First I need to
know what deal I am getting with faith. An uptime statistics for each app
shows GAE is confident and serious and willing to be held accountable of
the quality of the service they delivery.
Cheers
Same here. HR, python 2.7, threadsafe:false. Over 10K DEEs, seems back to
normal about an hour ago.
A similar incident happened on last Monday I believe.
Will
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:10 AM, bFlood wrote:
> the instance serving warnings are:
>
> "Request was aborted after waiti
t; without other errors.
Thanks,
Will
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Anand Mistry wrote:
> What are your apps that are being affected?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To view th
I migrated mine about 2 weeks ago, with about 3.6GB data. A very smooth
sail.
Will
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Ron wrote:
> Has anyone tried doing a HRD Migration for a live system with large
> datastore?
>
> Any issues?
>
> --
> You received this message because you
now.
HTH,
Will
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Albert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some questions regarding setting up a reverse proxy to serve
> users in China.
>
> 1. Can I setup the reverse proxy such that it is only used when a
> visitor is coming from China?
> 2. I
sterday I switched back to 2.5, still on HRD. No errors since. For 9
hours, frontend instance hour back to about 26.
2.7 is still experimental, I totally understand. What rushed me to try it
out is the upcoming price hike (frontend instance hour discount is going
away), sadly, it is not experimen
nt of complains decreased drastically.
Where is your statistics from?
A server in China to bypass the GFW? Good luck, hahaha
Best,
Will
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> Only about 1/3 of china can reach you if you are on Amazon, and if you get
> assigned an
be on line.
If you are an individual, or a small company, want to rent a server in
China, good luck. Oh, even Google appears not big enough.
Freedom is a privilege.
Will
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Barry Hunter wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> A server in China to bypas
My hats off to you, Brandon.
Best,
Will
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> There is radio jamming actually. I was part of the Radio Free Asia group
> and one of the solutions we built before the internet opened up a bit in
> China was to park boats in inte
No, I don't use a geographic DNS, just simply redirect all requests by a
micro EC2 instance.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Albert wrote:
> "Wow!" to your stories, Brandon. I never realized it was that tough...
>
> Will, did you use a geographic DNS? Or did you r
d TLS session (Client Hello, Server Hello, etc etc) for
each request. Is there any way of getting keep-alive to work under TLS?
Is there something I'm doing wrong? Is this likely a problem with WinINet
or App Engine?
Cheers
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I've seen about 10 DDEs on HDR, Python25, in the past hour. There hadn't
been any problems for the past 3 days up to the point.
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email
For Python, use appcfg.py. I don't remember the exact command, 'help' will
easily lead you there...
Will
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Thiago Ismael wrote:
> I lost my project from my computer.
> I have to download the version that is in the cloud? how?
>
> --
Are you in mainland China? If so, the access to your site is blocked by
GFW. You can use a reverse-proxy to bypass it.
Will
2012/2/8 brite
> 打不开的现象自2011-11-7日就出现了，直到现在，依然如故。如何解决？
> since 7,nov,2011,my website http://mingzhpy.appspot.com/ cannot be
> opened.till now it's still so
Did I miss anything? Got a reply like this:
We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact
(google-appengine-stackoverflow) may not exist, or you may not have
permission to post messages to the group. A few more details on why you
weren't able to post:
* You might have spelled
I also noticed the number of email sent reported on dashboard is not
accurate sometimes. Yesterday it was 9 for my app, but I don't see 9 emails
because I get a copy of every email sent.
Will
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Florey wrote:
> I get used to the new pricing mo
Yeah, me too. Python25, HR.
I slowly get used to it, though.
Will
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:39 AM, GAEfan wrote:
> System status shows normal. Anyone else experiencing this?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App
That's not true in my case. A googler contacted me and explained the
situation to me.
Best,
Will
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ray wrote:
> Sorry but no one really care...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Googl
What does it differ from the django provided by GAE, such as django 1.2
with Python 2.7?
Thanks,
Will
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, John Gardner wrote:
> If you haven't seen app-engine-patch (the ancestor of django-nonrel), you
> should take a look.
> https://github.com/hux
ver is deemed a 'threat', the whole DNS may be blocked, as is the case
of GAE.
Good luck,
Will
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Eric Ka Ka Ng wrote:
> before heard that there were access problem to GAE (ghs.google.com) from
> mainland china.
> would like to know latest status a
For sure, cloudfare will help. I'm simply using Amazon's EC2 and it works
great for me. Yes, occasionally there are a few minutes glitches here and
there, especially when there is a political freak show going on such as
recently. Not ideal certainly but acceptable for my purpose. Don
today the
same thing happened again.
It is on HDR.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
I implemented the same workaround. For the past two days, it worked. It
looks more elegant than I schedule another same job just for fail-over.
Thanks,
Will
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:59 PM, weboo wrote:
> I have same problem.
> The cron job on dynamic backend instance does not works.
&g
My biggest concern is 'user account management'. Does webapp2 or any
others provide that?
Thanks,
Will
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Santiago wrote:
> Well. I was considering to migrate my Django app to webapp2. How are you
> using Django? Djangoappengine? Django-nonre
gives me the rest for
free. Despite my desire of migrating to light weight and more 'in
fashion' webapp2, I guess I need to stick to Django longer.
Best,
Will
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:06 AM, alex wrote:
> webapp2 doesn't provide a 'user account management' thing. Ap
ly be python specific. If these are just scheduled/non
memory related shut downs then there is no problem - I'm happy to setup a
handler to check and rerun the script. I just didn't want to do that if
there was an existing problem with my application.
Thanks for any help.
Will
On
Thanks for the response. I'm running a B8 and I've run AppStats on these
call in the past. I'll run it again and post the log to see if there's
anything interesting there.
Thanks for the help!
Will
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 2:57:07 PM UTC-8, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On
ine_config per documentation.
4. The first time I successfully ran the script with appstats I got an
"Invalid or stale record" error when trying to view the timeline. I made no
changes, waited about an hour, then reran the script and it worked...
Will
On Friday, November 8, 2013 8:3
bad thing.
3. Move these pieces from a module to a Google Compute Engine instance.
While it's not ideal working without an explicitly identified issue, I've
got to do what I can to get this consistently running. I'm still 50% at
best.
Thanks again for all your help.
Will
On Frida
uld be some variable(s) hogging up more and more memory as the script ran.
Thanks again for the help.
Will
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:14:27 PM UTC-8, wi...@smallwhere.com wrote:
>
> Sorry for the temporary radio silence. I was trying to get an AppStats log
> for my local machine
Yes, 74.125.127.141 is the one I'm seeing, too. It is almost a torture to
watch your site on and off randomly everyday...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Yiou wrote:
> Just some of GAE IP have been blocked by GFW. Is there any chance that
> Google deletes these blocked IP from DNS resolve list?
Just now I get a "There were errors: GQL Query" in the Data Viewer.
SELECT * FROM User WHERE enabled=FALSE
I have tried other queries as well. None of them work. They worked before though.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
all DNS requests from China are handled by
appspot-china.l.google.com. Please, don't rotate 74.125.127.141 behind it,
it will make life much easier for sites serving China.
Best,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine"
Then we deal with that later. Some people there and across the world are
working hard to reach the ultimate solution, but for now, this is an easy
and quick fix.
Will
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Wooble wrote:
> What makes you think your government won't just block other IPs u
Most of the time, yourapp.appspot.com can be accessed in China.
www.yourdomain.com is a different story, many times it can't. What we've
done is advertising yourapp.appspot.com in China.
Good luck,
Will
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Dark-horse wrote:
> The access is bei
Yes, your guess is correct, it is because of GFW.
Will
2010/4/20 时空之蕊
> 以前可以通过自己的域名访问GAE程序，目前在中国大陆无法通过自己的域名访问GAE程序
>
> 难道是伟大的GFW?
>
> in china now we can't visit my gae(http://cms4gae.appspot.com/) with
> my domain: http://extjs.cms4g.org
>
> but i can visit my
support team here pass the message to the appropriate unit? If
not, where can I raise the issue to?
Thanks,
Will
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegrou
7;RegexURLResolver' object has no attribute 'name'
The thing is, we haven't changed urls.py for a long time, and majority
of the time, the urls get resolved
successfully.
What could be the problem? Are there urls.py best practice guidelines
that we can check out?
Thanks,
W
I'm using app-engine-patch.
The issue doesn't look like fully matching our problem, but I will take a
look at the patch. Thanks,
Will
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:26 PM, dar wrote:
> This sounds very similar to the issue reported on the google-app-
> engine-django helper is
The status page is down. my app seems to be really slow, some times I
get error 500.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@go
t;WHERE p1 = :a AND p2 = :b ORDER BY p2", a = None, b =
23).fetch(1)
item.p1 = sth
item.put()
The above code should run in a transaction. What should I do?
Thanks in advance.
Will
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
The type of p1, p2 and sth is datetime.
Can you give me some examples of 'ancestor queries'? If possible, I'd like
to change the existing ones into 'ancestor queries' and fit the whole into a
transaction, because that is exactly what a transaction designed for.
Thanks,
one, b =
today).fetch(1)
item.p1 = now
item.put()
Both p1 and p2 are datetime. How can I build this into a transaction? Is
there a way I can give the entities a 'place holder' ancestor so I can later
use an 'ancestor filter' in the query to satisfy the requirement?
Thanks,
Will
Finding out
the key of the entity first out of a transaction and then using the key
inside the transaction defeats the purpose.
Will
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:24 PM, 风笑雪 wrote:
> Why you need a transaction to update just one entity? Just save it and
> you may get an exception when u
dummy parent entity for
those entities you want to query in a transaction. What I'm looking for is a
guide with good examples for querying (otherwise) root entities in a
transaction.
Will
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Eli Jones wrote:
> Nevermind, I see what you mean.
>
> So you
It is because the regime blocks the access to google docs/spreadsheet. It
appears that after Obama's visit to China, it became available again. I'm
able to access with https.
Will
2009/11/25 胡江海
>
> Thank you for your email.
>>
> I can not use my spreadsheet of goo
It is Chinese 'great firewall' in action. The whole ghs.google.com is
blocked. If your GAE project uses custom domain (which I suspect most do),
then your domain will not be visible within mainland China, at least for
now. Access to appspot.com is OK.
This is a risk you may want to c
e this:
tmp = db.Blob(s.blob)
but failed because db.Blob's constructor only takes a str object.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Will
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" grou
So what you suggest is to define an "append" function as a _member_ of the
Storage, then it should work. I will try that and report back, but why it
should work?
I am new to both Python and GAE, so excuse me for any naive questions.
Thanks,
Will
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM,
No, doesn't work. I got
unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'BlobProperty' and 'str'
Same as before.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Will wrote:
> So what you suggest is to define an "append" function as a _member_ of the
> Storage, then it should w
= len(self.__storage.content)
Thanks,
Will
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Alexander Kojevnikov <
alexan...@kojevnikov.com> wrote:
>
> > No, doesn't work. I got
> >
> > unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'BlobProperty' and 'str'
> >
> >
__ while keeping the definition in the class body, I got
Property content must be convertible to a Blob instance (Blob() argument
should be str instance, not BlobProperty)
Seems this time* content* was constructed but in __init__() somehow it
wanted to initialize it by a Blob instance, not BlobProperty?!
#x27;t complain anymore.
When accessing, it returns a db.Blog doesn't sound too foreign to me. For
now, I just think it as a customized type caster in C++.
But I am facing another problem now, I will post it in a new thread
'Different behavior in Debug run'.
Regards,
Will
On Tue, Jan
Hi TLH,
I'm writing a FileUploadHandler that saves files into a Blob, hence I'm
using BlobProperty.
Will
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:56 PM, TLH wrote:
>
> from google.appengine.ext import db
>
> class Foo(db.Model):
> b = db.BlobProperty()
> def butWhy(self, s):
&g
Hi all,
I'm writing a very simple file upload form using Django. I use Pydev and
Eclipse. When I simply run it, the posted data are received; but when I run
it as Debug, it says 'form.is_valid()' returns False, and I am pretty sure
it is because the required values ('title', 'uploader', etc) are m
Hi,
Is the limit on datastore entry to be lifted soon, or will be around for a
while? Is it possible now for a user to upload a 10MB file and save into 10
datastore entries?
Regards,
Will
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can upload and serve sta
To me, keeping 1MB datastore entity limit while allowing 10MB
request/response doesn't make much sense. It is more useful to make the
limits in sync/compatible.
Regards,
Will
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:21 PM, frank Shi wrote:
>
>
> Because of these limits , leading to the implem
Hi there,
I recently upgraded to GAE 1.1.9, and google-appengine-patch 1.0. The local
test run is fine, but when I tried to upload to server using "appcfg.py
update", I got an error (see below). I'm using Python 2.5.2, Windows XP.
Thanks in advance.
Will
No, before it. After that, I did run appcfg.py rollback, seemingly
successfully.
One note is I am unable to access code.google.com from China. Not sure if it
is relevant.
Thanks,
Will
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this happen after yo
The link seems broken, or incomplete in the original email...
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Sylvain wrote:
>
> I like it :)
>
> On Mar 13, 3:12 am, Amr Ellafi wrote:
> > well done ! many thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Let Delete My Apps <
> >
> > davide.rogn...@gmail.com> w
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
