Maybe I missed a memo on this but when will you be able to create more
than 10 apps or use one app for multiple domains (SAAS)?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to thi
See this idea: Google "AdSense" on "App Engine"
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/416f671a246a3e07#
.
.
.
On Feb 24, 10:30 pm, Jeff S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've just announced that it is now possible to purchase additional
> quota for your application. To borrow
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Andy Freeman wrote:
>
> Is there any way for an application to know that it's run into quota
> problems or, better yet, where it is wrt usage.
>
> This would be useful for applications that have some flexibility in
> how they behave (some can adjust refr
The issue has already been raised as
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=655
On Feb 27, 8:12 am, Andy Freeman wrote:
> Is there any way for an application to know that it's run into quota
> problems or, better yet, where it is wrt usage.
>
> This would be useful for applic
Is there any way for an application to know that it's run into quota
problems or, better yet, where it is wrt usage.
This would be useful for applications that have some flexibility in
how they behave (some can adjust refresh rates) and could also be used
to trigger an e-mail to an administrator.
Hi RAT,
You are correct. Here's an FAQ on how to proceed if you are in one of
these unlisted countries:
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html#unlisted
Happy coding,
Jeff
On Feb 26, 1:22 pm, RAT wrote:
> It's just me or Brazil is not on the list of available countries able
> to pur
It's just me or Brazil is not on the list of available countries able
to purchase additional Quota?
Thanks
On Feb 24, 6:30 pm, Jeff S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've just announced that it is now possible to purchase additional
> quota for your application. To borrow from our blog post,
>
> """
> We
At work, a run of our primary app occupies 1400 cores (700 real
cores?) for several hours. So, I might estimate that that'd cost
something like $200 per run. Not negligible, given that the hardware
cost is already partly sunk. Like I said, I know this isn't Google's
goal necessarily, but it mig
Hi Peter,
I understand that 30 active simultaneous limit is only for free quota
apps and I have already enabled billing.
Let's forget for now about request/min quota. Point is that 'free'
apps could have for half minute long up to 30 000ms/sec burst rate (30
active dynamic requests), but next 30
Note: CPU time is charged at a rate of $0.10 per *hour*--time is
measured by the second, and we round up to the nearest cent, so using
30 minutes of usage beyond the free threshold on a given day would
cost $0.05 :)
Pete
On Feb 25, 8:05 am, Mike wrote:
> I am watching your changes in the quo
The quota is actually 500 requests per second..or 30,000 per minute,
or 43m per day.
Google says this should be enough to withstand 'the heaviest of
slashdottings', but that if you need more, you can request a raising
of caps here:
http://code.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEn
I am watching your changes in the quota system from the perspective of
wanting to run massive parallel applications on it. Considered that
way, the changes are a definite improvement, though not quite to the
point where it would be worth it for us. In particular, if I read
your docs right, one a
hi peter
is the per-minute CPU Time quota expandable with the new billing
options?
brian
On Feb 25, 9:39 am, Pete Koomen wrote:
> Hi Matija,
>
> The per-minute CPU limit is independent of the number of active
> requests you can run. Let's assume your requests were taking on
> average 200ms of
Hi Matija,
The per-minute CPU limit is independent of the number of active
requests you can run. Let's assume your requests were taking on
average 200ms of CPU time and completed in 200ms wall clock time, to
keep things simple. There are at least three limits that come into
play here. Looking
There is a cap at 3 Request per Second. well I surely know that ,
flikr,facebook,youtube or any big out there is getting more hits than
that...
so possibility of making some next generation supercool site only on
google app engine is impossible ??
{ yeh , i know , the chances that my applica
How can '...An application operating entirely within the free quotas
can process around 30 active dynamic requests at any given moment...'
if maximum rate for CPU time within free default quota is 15 CPU-min/
min ? Should you correct that statement to 15 active dynamic
requests ?
Pozdrav, MATijA.
Looking at new quotas I see "Data Sent to [datastore] API" capped at
"153 MByte/min".
Uhm. This comes down to 2.5Mbyte/sec.
How does this qualify for the "easy to scale applicatins" promise if
the best I'm going to get is 2.5Mbyte/sec worth of disk writes?
I mean that's pretty cool for a single se
Hi bej34,
No, the 1MB size limit for a datastore entity is still in place, but
now you could store more of them ;-) Also if this is a file which is
being uploaded to your application, the size limit is 10MB, but it
sounded like you meant items in the datastore.
Thank you,
Jeff
On Feb 24, 5:30
I'm still a bit confusedcan we now upload files larger than 1MB or
can we just upload more than the 1 GB total storage quota. For
example, can my blob property be the equivalent of a 50MB video file?
On Feb 24, 5:38 pm, "Tom M." wrote:
> Fantastic! While personally I hope not to have to she
Fantastic! While personally I hope not to have to shell out too much
coin, I'll contribute my $0.02 now and then. ;-)
I can quite sincerely thank Google for teaching this "old dog" new
tricks. I have an application (Wine by the Bar) that runs on the
Android phone and is backed by GAE. Throw in
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 1:44 pm, Jeff S wrote:
>> Were do you see $0.005/GB/mo? On the settings page and Dashboard we're
>> showing the *daily* cost per GB, since that is how we compute actual
>> cost. 30 * 0.005 = $0.15GB/day.
>
> I think the time unit needs
On Feb 24, 1:44 pm, Jeff S wrote:
> Were do you see $0.005/GB/mo? On the settings page and Dashboard we're
> showing the *daily* cost per GB, since that is how we compute actual
> cost. 30 * 0.005 = $0.15GB/day.
I think the time unit needs to be clarified. In the billing doc
(http://code.google
Hi Bill,
I seems Brett replied to your initial post (
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/07365a8c5bcb2c0e
)
to quote:
Were do you see $0.005/GB/mo? On the settings page and Dashboard we're
showing the *daily* cost per GB, since that is how we compute actual
cos
Congratulations to the entire App Engine team for rolling out this
much requested feature.
There seems to be an inconsistency in the cited storage pricing. The
blog post says $0.15/GB/mo, but the docs and my app dashboard say
$0.005/GB/mo, which is a huge drop in pricing if correct.
Which one is
24 matches
Mail list logo
