Hi, All.
First off, I have to say I'm astounded by the quality of support I
have got on this issue.
I'm finding my way in Python and App Engine at the moment.
I had no idea my question would generate so much work for you guys.
Also, apologies for not having the time in the past week to track
Hi David,
No plans yet. I often accomplish these sorts of things using a
baseclass/subclass of FSMAction. Hopefully the following (UNTESTED)
code helps you along.
===
OBSERVERS = 'observers'
class ObserverFSMAction(FSMAction):
# this is an abstract base class
def execute(self, context,
cool i take a loot.
Extending this a bit it adds a lot of potential to make FSM observable via
configuration. Each transition or action could have a list of observers - it
also pops into my mind Prospective Search -
On 10 June 2011 10:22, Shawn R shawn.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
No
@Mike_W, I've updated the docs to describe this new feature.
http://code.google.com/p/fantasm/wiki/AdvancedConcepts#Fan-In
j
On Jun 8, 9:44 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Shawn,
Awesome, I'll try to review it tomorrow!
Hopefully Mike is still following this thread
i'm also using it right now for some moderation flows i need to finish so i
will test it too
On 9 June 2011 10:14, Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
@Mike_W, I've updated the docs to describe this new feature.
http://code.google.com/p/fantasm/wiki/AdvancedConcepts#Fan-In
j
BTW - any intentions on plugging an observer pattern/plugin around it :) ?
It would be awesome to have a list of observers watching for change on
states (subject)
On 9 June 2011 12:22, David Mora dla.m...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm also using it right now for some moderation flows i need to finish so
Hi Robert,
Done. http://code.google.com/p/fantasm/source/detail?r=147.
Please give it a quick review if you are able.
Thanks again.
--
Shawn
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hey Shawn,
Awesome, I'll try to review it tomorrow!
Hopefully Mike is still following this thread and will help us test
it out. :)
Robert
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:03, Shawn shawn.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
Done. http://code.google.com/p/fantasm/source/detail?r=147.
Please
Fantasm and App Engine Pipelines endeavour to solve similar problems
(i.e., distributing a large workflow over many processors in a
reliable, scalable way), but use somewhat different approaches. Both
leverage taskqueue-driven queuing but hide the actual task work from
the developer.
There are a
Yup, you're right Robert. That patch would address this issue, but we
haven't applied yet. Nothing wrong with the patch, just some latency
on the open source project in general.
j
On Jun 6, 8:39 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Jason,
Sounds like Mike is asking for the same
I can relate to latency on projects. Have some updates I need to push
out to stuff as well.
Maybe we'll find one or more volunteers will to help contribute new
code and / or test this patch. :)
Robert
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 13:31, Jason Collins jason.a.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, you're
Robert,
IIRC, the bottleneck on my end was getting the unit tests to pass. The
patch caused some failures (in a feature I wanted to deprecate
anyway), but I have not had time to get to it. Now that two people
want the feature, I'll try to prioritize.
Thanks again for the patch :-)
--
Shawn
On
Currently, the fan_in aggregation rules cannot be customized; Fantasm
will aggregate anything that belongs to the same machine instance.
We're looking at some possible adjustments to this to allow developers
to specify their desired fan_in semantics. No ETA.
For now, you could split your machine
Hey Jason,
Sounds like Mike is asking for the same thing I was when first
looking at Fantasm (quite some time ago now). I thought we'd came up
with a patch that supported this? I'm not really sure where we left
off with that.
Robert
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 13:04, Jason Collins
Hi!
This is probably off-topic, but is Fantasm somewhat similar to
Appengine-Pipelines?
I mean I can perform the same computation tasks either with Fantasm or
Appengine-Pipelines... If I am wrong could you point how Fantasm is
different?
Thank you.
--
You received this message because you are
15 matches
Mail list logo
