erstand what it is
> you're trying to say - can you make it a little clearer what your symptoms
> are and what you've tried to do to fix it?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Sunday, 18 March 2012 04:16:45 UTC+11, Christian Goudreau wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>&
mportant to use because we
need to store files the goes between 100 and 200mo, which doesn't work
without the blobstore generated upload handler.
And this is weird, because it's working locally and it's not when I publish
to app engine...
My GAE version is 1.6.3 on my local enviro
7;m going billed for the small
time it takes to "forward" the request.
I may be misunderstanding something, so please take care of my
misconceptions :D
cheers,
--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Go
Did you find anything on this Gal, I'm also interested in this post.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/tHr3yxxn8XsJ.
To
ant to use the html5 new multiple upload input to add a lot of images
into my blobstore.
If anyone has encountered something similar, please help me.
thanks,
--
Christian Goudreau
www.arcbees.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App
> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>
>
--
Christian G
gt;
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to
> google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
> >
; Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/guit/
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine for Java" group.
> To post to this group,
t; It is most useful to specify EVENTUAL read consistency to increase
> performance by decreasing error rates due to contention.
>
> On 5 Jul 2010, at 20:22, Christian Goudreau wrote:
>
> DatastoreServiceConfig doesn't exist anymore !?
>
> void setServiceFromConfig(DatastoreSer
tions, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
> Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
> Reddit
d for the application
> you have in mind. If they're not exaggerated, then probably Google App
> Engine is not the solution you need.
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Christian Goudreau <
> goudreau.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I need some answers, it&#x
I need some answers, it's really important for my business.
Regards,
Christian
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Christian Goudreau <
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh I forgot one question that my administrators asked me.
>
> If I delete an objet from my datastore
Is it possible ?
I want to have this monday data inside my datastore : apapulintranet
Christian Goudreau
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@google
Oh I forgot one question that my administrators asked me.
If I delete an objet from my datastore, how long this data is kept in
Google's backup ?
Christian
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Christian Goudreau <
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot,
>
> My la
7;ll be up to you to write your
> > application in a secure fashion (prevent XSS attacks, educate users about
> > phishing, logically segment data, etc).
> >
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Christian Goudreau <
> >
> >
> >
> > goudreau.christ...@g
I want to understand exactly how data that I send into data store are
secured, the limitation and what is the guarantee if someone brakes in and
steel some personnal informations about a member ?
I want to build a small a application for a small business that store a lot
of informations about thei
I want to come !
Next year maybe :)
Christian
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Ikai L (Google) wrote:
> Hey Toby! Have you tried the #io2010 hashtag (and other hashtags) on
> Twitter? There are many App Engine developers trickling into town that would
> probably take you up on your offer.
>
>
ou can initiate a session by calling
>
>HttpServletRequest.getSession(true)
>
> and in a JSP
>
> by adding the attribute
>
> session="true"
>
> to a page directive.
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
>
> 2010/5/5 Christian Goudreau
>
>>
This request caused a new process to be started for your application,
and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time.
This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical
request for your application.
How can I avoid that message ? It wasn't even a new process.
And what about app that will no see their traffic grows ?
Mine is mostly an intranet and it's annoying to see how slow it is because
of those sleep time... Is it possible to make them last longer ? I even get
some persistance problems when it goes to sleep...
I'm using guiceFilters with the comma
I have the same problem from time to time... It's anying every 60 secondes
my app throw that message.
Christian
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Daisy wrote:
> A few minutes after I posted the previous message, the app started to
> work. But that is a testing app, and the real one's app id is
>
:
> hi, are u using java ? if yes, the object you push into session must
> implements java.io.Serializable .
> you can follow this blog for more info:
> http://www.hapeblog.com/blog.shtml?id=7
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Christian Goudreau <
> goudreau.christ.
Hummm I got a weird issue
I added to my appengine-web.xml this line :
true
But no JSESSIONID cookie is created.
Anyway Idea why ?
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to go
All is in the title...
Any idea how to cut down that loading time the first time ?
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscr
y!), but on the other hand it is open
> source.
>
> On Apr 25, 1:29 pm, Christian Goudreau
> wrote:
> > I have one question in mind after reading what you wrote, in wich way you
> > have better control in Objectify than Twig ? I'm interested since I moved
> >
I have one question in mind after reading what you wrote, in wich way you
have better control in Objectify than Twig ? I'm interested since I moved
from Objectify to Twig and didn't end up in that situation, yet.
For the cons of only one Developper, he may be alone, but he answer every
single one
It's failling for everyone. You just have to go back to 1.3.2.
Someone from google answered in a post that they're working on that issue.
Christian
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Millisecond wrote:
> Trying to deploy my app (noticeorange) with the 1.3.3 runtime is
> giving me some hiccups w
.3.3 SDK bug that I found,
> you can register an error handler for 404 by adding
> something like this to your web.xml:
>
>
> 404
> /404.html
>
>
> We're working on a real fix.
> -- Don
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Christian Goudreau <
&g
Update : In my case, switching back to AppEngine 1.3.2 was enough.
Christian
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Christian Goudreau <
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DAMN I should have read this message before... now stuck with the same
> problem as the other and no o
DAMN I should have read this message before... now stuck with the same
problem as the other and no older version.
Christian
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Don Schwarz wrote:
> Also, if you have an old version of your application still deployed that
> does not show this problem, please provid
That's something I didn't knew. It's something usefull to know
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:19 PM, John Patterson wrote:
> Yeah the annotations are fine. The GWT compiler does not include them in
> the compiled JS code.
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 09:09, Christian Gou
Yes, a lot actually. I was asking myself that question since I introduced in
my POJO's some TWIG annotation and didn't know if those information are
compatible with GWT-RPC Mecanism.
I'll give a deeper look into twig tomorow.
Thanks
Christian
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM, John Patterson wro
32 matches
Mail list logo
