.e., ((Integer) null).intValue() you get the NPE.
> >
> >
> > Jeffrey Goetsch wrote:
> >> Why do I get a NullPointerException when I add a new primitive field
> >> to an object? Why doesn't JDO just recognize that it is a primitive
> >> and leave the default val
Why do I get a NullPointerException when I add a new primitive field to an
object? Why doesn't JDO just recognize that it is a primitive and leave the
default value?
Thanks,
--Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
amount of email, which would mean
$100 per day.
How are other people handling this kind of scenario?
Thanks,
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-a
What is the most efficient way of querying the "many" side of an
unowned relationship. E.g., assuming the standard JDO annotations are
applied:
class Person
{
Set foods;
}
class Food
{
Key key;
String name; // unique
}
Given the name of a Food, how can I best get the list of Person
o
Could you create a Servlet that is loaded on launch, and set this kind of
property? I think this is a workaround until they can do it officially.
--Jeff
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Toby Reyelts wrote:
> Yes, I totally agree that the current official way of checking for App
> Engine presen
Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Max Ross (Google)
> wrote:
> Could you please post the model objects that are involved? Also, what
> version of the SDK are you using?
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Jeffrey Goetsch wrote:
>
>> Update: This appea
Yes, no place in my code do I call tx.begin().I don't believe I even
made an update, but it is possible that I did some clean up updates when I
accessed some of the data. But definitely don't have any transaction code.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM, James H wr
/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2456#makechanges
Thanks,
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this g
Update: This appears to happen when I remove the last entry in the Set.
--Jeff
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Jeffrey Goetsch wrote:
> I am getting this exception when I try and remove an Owned object from a
> Set. Let me know if you need more then the stack trace.
>
> Thank
I am getting this exception when I try and remove an Owned object from a
Set. Let me know if you need more then the stack trace.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
Caused by: org.datanucleus.exceptions.NucleusUserException:
deletePersistent() called recursively
at
g at several techniques to speed up Java application startup time.
> It's also been suggested that we should look at a billing enabled option for
> keeping a certain number of instances warm at all times.
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Jeffrey Goetsch wrote:
>
>> I have n
Login Name of the user making the request.
Also the Logger Name is not anywhere in the Log message, which describes
where the real log came from.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to
thread talking about these issues.
--Jeffrey
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Donny wrote:
> I use JPA in my servlet in my app, but some times when I query data
> google app engine will report some exception(following is my log from
> app engine's admin log. ResultServlet is my
I was having about 2 hour index build times. I think a lot of people were
launching over the weekend.
--Jeff
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Tim Cooper wrote:
> I've just deployed my AppEngine application for the first time. It
> was working perfectly when running in the development environm
a:256)
at org.datanucleus.ObjectManagerImpl.close(ObjectManagerImpl.java:801)
at
org.datanucleus.jdo.JDOPersistenceManager.close(JDOPersistenceManager.java:271)
... 51 more
Thanks,
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
20ms. Does this mean you should make sure
you have at least on cron running every minute?
Thanks,
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googl
ed with opening, closing and retrieving instances of
> PersistenceManager.
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jeffrey Goetsch wrote:
>
>> Here is a subset of the code. It doesn't run or have the logic that
>> changes the values. I have included the ChallengeD
hat packets the data needed for the GWT front end.
Like I said before, I am will to share the entire code base with people that
are working on these issues in datanucleus code, but not to the entire
group. I am willing to answer any questions you might have.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
public class *
I am not using OpenPersistenceManagerInViewFilter, but I am using Spring to
create the PersistenceManager at the beginning of the a request. If am
changing many objects, and I seem to have problems where they don't get
stored to the datastore. I can check right before I close the
PersistenceManage
simplifying the issue to post to this list,
but as the code gets simpler the issues seem to go away. I am willing to
share my larger code base with developers that are working on trying to fix
these problems, but I don't want make a general post to everyone.
Thanks,
Jeffrey Goetsch
--
this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/a44cb049f40d6bab/f9047e0a25e3453f?lnk=gst&q=JDO+collection+null#f9047e0a25e3453f
If it is, this should be a very high priority bug, because this seems like
required functionality.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
public
Jason,
Thanks for the reply and checking the code. It is the null issue that is
causing this issue, but I had a second issue that I will start a new thread
for.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jason (Google) wrote:
> Hi Jeff. I'm having trouble reproducing this. I kept everythin
22 matches
Mail list logo
