[appengine-java] Re: Disappointment about JPA relationships :(

2010-10-25 Thread Simon
I agree the documentation isn't fabulous for JPA, in that a vast majority of it focuses on the JDO implementation and you end up having to work out which bits of DataNucleus documentation should be used and is relevant for GAE. However, to give the team a bit of credit the restrictions you are

[appengine-java] Re: Disappointment about JPA relationships :(

2010-10-25 Thread Matthieu Bertin
That is very true. The page you show is quite explaining why i got theses exceptions, but i wouldn't have understood anything before i ran into theses exceptions, and not even understanding if this page was JDO or JPA documentation. Anyway, i got it now and i'm back on tracks, but i would have

[appengine-java] Re: Disappointment about JPA relationships :(

2010-10-24 Thread Vikas Hazrati
Hi Matthieu, You are right, you need some conditioning and then you need to work around the limitations of working with relationships around JPA. Then finally you tend to realize more and more that may be you are better off with unowned relationships Here are the issues that we faced and tried

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Disappointment about JPA relationships :(

2010-10-24 Thread sambandamn dam
*Sir, Thanks for your guidelines. Thankyou. * On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Vikas Hazrati vhazr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthieu, You are right, you need some conditioning and then you need to work around the limitations of working with relationships around JPA. Then finally you tend to