this is my code for this problem and it worked well
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
void changevalue(pair p, string s, int j);
int main() {
int T, N, countE = 0, countS = 0;
string lydia;
string out = "";
vector output(2);
cin >> T;
output.resize(T);
This question is making me crazy..
Any help appreciated.
My Solution:
explanation:
two possible test cases:
1. where first two ciphers are different and you figure out the first two
letters by finding prime factors and division and using those numbers and
performing division on subsequent
El lunes, 8 de abril de 2019, 22:41:03 (UTC+2), ACTECH escribió:
> On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 11:09:13 PM UTC+5:30, Marcel Ubach wrote:
> > El domingo, 7 de abril de 2019, 23:21:04 (UTC+2), Fixman escribió:
> > > There are a couple of edge cases that aren't present in the test cases:
> > >
> >
import math
def solve():
_, l = map(int, input().split())
p = [int(i) for i in input().split()]
fs, sc = p[0:2]
pr = math.gcd(fs, sc) if fs != sc else int(math.sqrt(fs))
vals = []
vals.append(fs / pr)
vals.append(pr)
vals.append(sc / pr)
for i in range(2, l):
vals.append
Hi Ronald,
I also have similar complaints about editorial, but it's basically
because I am used to read research papers where they specify problem
(in this case, the problem statement itself), existing approach (what
others have done) and what are short comings, followed by their
approach with a bi
This was my solution for CodeJam Qualification Round
Question 3 : CryptoPangrams
link :
https://codingcompetitions.withgoogle.com/codejam/round/00051705/0008830b
I am getting a correct answer for the 2 sample cases provided but it fails in
all the test cases. I tried setting Erro
Does your code works for the cipher text:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6
?
Even my code worked for the 2. and 3. but failed for 1.:
1. AABC..
2. ABABABABA...
3. Very Large Prime Numbers
Generally, it should fail for AA..., the 3rd one is trivial though.
I realized this error after posting the wh
On Sunday, 7 April 2019 18:57:19 UTC+5:30, Vinodharanie Sivalingam wrote:
> Can anyone tell what are the possible reasons for getting RE in
> cryptopanagram in java?
Example
A=3, B=5, C=7, D=11, E=13, F=17
Ciphertext = DCDCDCF..
77 77 77 77 77 119 ...
My program output was = CDCDCDD
El lunes, 8 de abril de 2019, 22:41:03 (UTC+2), ACTECH escribió:
> On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 11:09:13 PM UTC+5:30, Marcel Ubach wrote:
> > El domingo, 7 de abril de 2019, 23:21:04 (UTC+2), Fixman escribió:
> > > There are a couple of edge cases that aren't present in the test cases:
> > >
> >
In the problem analysis of Cryptopangrams, following is mentioned.
An essential skill in Code Jam is picking the right tool (language) for the
right job.
Clearly for this problem C, C++ was not right tool as there is no support for
BIG NUMBERS.
I am not sure was this the case earlier? Earlie
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 4:40:47 PM UTC-4, Peter Chikov wrote:
> My solution follows the analysis and still times out(TLE).
>
> using System;
> using System.Collections.Generic;
> using System.IO;
> using System.Linq;
> using System.Text;
> using System.Threading.Tasks;
>
> namespace Problem1
понедельник, 8 апреля 2019 г., 23:40:47 UTC+3 пользователь Peter Chikov написал:
> My solution follows the analysis and still times out(TLE).
>
> using System;
> using System.Collections.Generic;
> using System.IO;
> using System.Linq;
> using System.Text;
> using System.Threading.Tasks;
>
> name
I've met the same problem with Kotlin. I think the fact that compilation time
is included into the time limit was not the best idea in this year rules since
it discourages use of languages with slower compilers:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-code/KJuTi4PnXzQ
On Sunday, April 7,
I had a basically identical solution to you for the first two test cases. I
made one change to my solution in an attempt to make it more efficient for the
hidden test case. I switched from concatenating strings to using a
StringBuilder (I was concerned about memory too).
Can't spot anything el
Hmm, alright noted I'll take a look into this later when I have more time then
/dev/joe. Judging by the replies here however there does seem to be other cases
where this code could cause RE. Will update once I've tried the fix.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
I have been having the same problem. The Code Jam team said it is okay to post
code now, so here's mine. Not sure where I could be getting a runtime error.
I don't think there should be any division by 0, because the only places I
divide are when I am dividing a product of 2 primes by one if
On Sunday, April 7, 2019 at 5:37:00 PM UTC-4, Ronan Burke wrote:
> My solution for this one was to just do the opposite of the route the other
> person took. If you did something other than, I imagine things could get
> quite messy and it would be easy to make a mistake.
>
> Their route: "SSEESE
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 4:49:04 PM UTC-4, Matteo Landi wrote:
> On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 7:33:10 PM UTC+2, Vinodharanie Sivalingam wrote:
> > On Sunday, 7 April 2019 18:57:19 UTC+5:30, Vinodharanie Sivalingam wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell what are the possible reasons for getting RE in
> >
I have tried all sample cases provided here. Works just fine. Infact all my
test cases passes but submissions says. TestCasePassed but time limit exceeded.
Any suggestions ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe fro
Your code allocated too little for path (2n-2 for n = 5) so it invoked an
undefined behavior.
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 12:33:10 PM UTC-5, Felik Junvianto wrote:
> I found my solution to receive MLE verdict on this problem (for last
> subtask). I am not sure where did I go wrong since I ju
Try using a StringBuilder instead of path +=
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 12:33:11 PM UTC-5, Peter Chikov wrote:
> I have the solution below. It works on the two test cases but times out on
> the hidden test set. Could you please advise on how I could have possibly
> made it faster.
>
> using S
Thank you everybody. Indeed this is for 'You Can Go Your Own Way' and I will
use StringBuilder from now on.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to g
Oh my gosh thank you very much Narut! Didn't realize I made such blunder
allocating array of size N only, while the path length is 2N - 2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
On Monday, April 8, 2019 at 8:41:08 PM UTC-4, Xiongqi ZHANG wrote:
> Works for me. Not sure why it does not work for you.
>
> Please note that you should submit the generated output of the program, not
> the program itself.
>
> The output should start with 'Case #1:' (without quotes).
>
> 在 201
I believe only the standard library for python3 is available in codejam,
and numpy isn't in it.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 11:07 kriskissel via Google Code Jam <
google-code@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I have been having the same problem. The Code Jam team said it is okay to
> post code now, so here's
Your code fails for the following case:
Plaintext: A B A B A B C
Ciphertext: 2 2 2 2 2 6 ..
The solution is to backtrace from where the sequence ends.
This is what your code produces
1
5 6
2 2 2 2 2 3
Case #1: BABABAC
1
5 6
2 2 2 2 2 3
Case #1: BABABAC
Same Result in Both the cases.
O
Hi Jan,
A single Google account can be associated with multiple email addresses. We
use the primary email of the account to send all of our emails. You can
check your account settings at https://myaccount.google.com/.
Best,
Pablo
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1:47 PM Jan Stepanek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why
PS: If, after checking your settings, you believe the emails are going to
the wrong place, please contact us privately at code...@google.com, as
debugging this may require us to ask about some personal information,
specifically, your email addresses.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:03 AM Pablo Heiber w
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int gcd (int a,int b)
{
if (a==b)
{
return a;
}
if (a> t;
for (int y=1;y<=t;y++)
{
int n,l;
cin >> n >> l;
int arr[l];
int number
Hey,
Is there anyone using Lisp to solve the problems? I would love to read
other people solutions, and I would not mind sharing mine if anyone was
interested (well, I am not an expert, so...)
Ciao,
Matteo
--
Matteo Landi
https://matteolandi.net
--
You received this message because you are
On 04/09, Zenquiorra wrote:
Does your code works for the cipher text:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6
?
Even though 1 is not a prime and by consequence the ciphertext above
should not be considered as valid input, my solution out is: ABC
Ciao,
Matteo
--
Matteo Landi
https://matteolandi.net
--
On 04/08, Vinodharanie Sivalingam wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2019 18:57:19 UTC+5:30, Vinodharanie Sivalingam wrote:
Can anyone tell what are the possible reasons for getting RE in cryptopanagram
in java?
Example
A=3, B=5, C=7, D=11, E=13, F=17
Ciphertext = DCDCDCF..
77 77 77 77 77 119 .
I have email to them and recived answer that this should be discussed there.
>Cryptopangrams (10pts, 15pts)
>A note on language choice
>An essential skill in Code Jam is picking the right tool (language) for the
>right job. For some problems ... it is probably better to choose a language
>
Furthemore, C# has BigInteger support. But it was not referenced into test
environment.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-code+unsub
My code, implementation here https://ideone.com/mbBiTy
it successfully solves all the test cases provided by you so far, all of
them, but it gives a RE error in CodeJam
Help Appreciated!
note:I had designed my code so that it is fast and solves only the first
sub problem and intentionally fails on
I did not understand the moment but now I realized that the calculation of
the greatest common divisor (GCD) returns the same number if the two
parameters are equal. This was my mistake. Ps.: google translator. Sorry!!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:07 PM Nicholas Sadjoli
wrote:
> Hmm, alright note
36 matches
Mail list logo
