Maven should not even allow you project to compile if that is the case. Dev
mode might still run. Try mvn install .
If that fails you prob have an import/reference to a test in you main src
code.
Post results back.
On 01/09/2011 7:06 AM, Jason Pack jason...@gmail.com wrote:
In your gwt.xml
2.1.1 SDK Bundle for Eclipse 3.6
2) Install the plugin following this instructions
http://code.google.com/intl/es/eclipse/docs/install-from-zip.htmlhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://code.google.com/intl/es/eclipse/docs/install-from-zip.html
Juan
2011/3/3 Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I've noticed a lot of posts that people are having trouble updating their
eclipse plugins (starting ~14th Feb 2011). I'm not updating, I have a fresh
Helios install that won't install the plugin or sdk from
http://dl.google.com/eclipse/plugin/3.6.
Would anyone be able to confirm this
Andrey,
The ?gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997 is very important and must be used when
running in dev mode. Production/compiled javascript (i.e. outside of dev
mode) will not need this.
--AH
p.s. this is identical for maven or eclipse.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:29 AM, ailinykh ailin...@gmail.com
BINGO! Thanks Thomas :)
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not a plugin issue. You probably just have a file in your browser
cache that references the older version.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I recently upgraded our app to 2.1.0 on a branch. All went well :) but we're
still running with 2.0 for sometime yet. Consequently, I am now switching
between GWT 2.0.4 and 2.1.0 as I switch branches. This is causing problems
with my Dev Mode Browser plugin (FireFox v1.0.7511).
The error reported
=ie8,gecko,gecko1_8,safari,opera/
[1] http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html
On Oct 9, 3:22 am, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi People,
I noticed that the (2.0.4) user.agent options are
'ie6,ie8,gecko,gecko1_8,safari,opera'.
The problem is, we would like to support
Hi People,
I noticed that the (2.0.4) user.agent options are
'ie6,ie8,gecko,gecko1_8,safari,opera'.
The problem is, we would like to support IE7 but not IE6 (because IE6 css
constraints).
AFAIK, IE7 is covered by the same user.agent as IE6... that being 'ie6'. So
how we support IE7 but not IE6?
Hi Again,
Sadly our application now appears to crash dev mode and/or the browser
plugin(s). The lack of visibility we have means I don't really know where
the problem lies. This is impeding development dramatically.
The only observations I can see is that:
* Windows reports that the 'The
Howdy,
Our ui.xml template styles would like to access some ImageResources defined
in a ClientBundle.
ui:with field=res
type=com.acme.project.client.resource.AcmeClientBundle/
But the @sprite's can't ever seem to use the ClientBundle's ImageResources
from the ui.xml's ui:style... for
Greetings,
Around Twelve months in the making and GWT-OpenLayers 0.5 has been released,
a BIG THANK YOU to everyone who contributed. I've posted this across a few
mailing lists that might find this interesting blend of technologies
applicable to their needs, these are primarily the GeoServer,
! *?
}
/ui:style
Cheers for replying tho :)
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Chris Conroy con...@google.com wrote:
Sounds like you need to use ui:with
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Using_an_external_resource
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Andrew Hughes
Here's a simple example WITHOUT external css file. It works, providing the
ClientBundle and the ui.xml are in the same package. I believe you can use
them from different packages but I still haven't worked out how.
ui:with type=blah.client.MyClientBundle field=cb/
ui:image field=loading
:17 pm, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
But when MyView and MyResources are in different packages,
resource={res.loading} never works. Is this expected and does it work
for
you?
It does work here
http://code.google.com/p/puzzlebazar/source/browse/src/com/puzzlebazar/client/core/view
={res.loading}/
But when MyView and MyResources are in different packages,
resource={res.loading} never works. Is this expected and does it work for
you?
CHEERS :)
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, marius.andreiana marius.andrei...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 7, 5:53 am, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com
Hi Guys,
I'll try to be concise :) I do *NOT* want to use an external css file. All
style should be in the ui.xml...
*Client Bundle:*
public interface MyClientBundle extends ClientBundle {
@Source(loading.gif) ImageResource loading();
}
*ui.xml*
ui:with type=blah.client.MyClientBundle
stuff... THANKS HEAPS.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'll try to be concise :) I do *NOT* want to use an external css file. All
style should be in the ui.xml...
*Client Bundle:*
public interface MyClientBundle extends ClientBundle
Hi Guys,
Not by choice we need to load Images from a *file:///* url.
For example...
*Image myImage** = **new** **Image(file:///c:/blah/blah.png);*
This will produce (as seen in chrome+firebug) html that looks like...
img src=file:///c:/blah/blah.png
The problem, is that the image
:
Yes its browser security, you need to load the images from the server and
not directly from the drive, I dont know what you are trying to do, but this
wont work on client side as the user may not have c: drive or the images.
- Abdullah
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Andrew Hughes ahhug
: *myResourceUrl*;
}
/style
Here, the image will be referenced without forcing width/height.
2010/8/9 Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com
Thanks Nicolas - I think I am very close
I'm trying this (very simple)...
ui:image field=onImage src=on.png/
g:Image resource=onImage
Déjà vu - this tread is nothing new.
If people would like to raise the GWT steering committee's awareness of
maven related issues, try using the tool setup for just this purpose :)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list
=deactiveImage /
*
2010/8/6 Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com
Hi Guys,
I can't find any doco, so help would be great! I want to set some
background gwt-image's inside my ui.xml's ui:style
Easiest way to ask my question is to show you what is not working :)
!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM http
Hi Guys,
I can't find any doco, so help would be great! I want to set some background
gwt-image's inside my ui.xml's ui:style
Easiest way to ask my question is to show you what is not working :)
!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM http://dl.google.com/gwt/DTD/xhtml.ent;
ui:UiBinder
this.xmin;
}-*/;
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank's again André :)
I've made some progress. you'r suggestion to use Integer and not
primitive int was bang on the mark! :) Unfornately autoboxing was masking
some of my problems - but now I have
I'm attempting to perform JSONP (cross domain ajax), just like in this great
article (thanks)
http://eggsylife.co.uk/2010/04/22/gwt-2-jsonp-and-javascript-overlays-with-jsonprequestbuilder/
The json response has optional attributes, it could be...
{error: yay}
or
{response: 53}
The
Thanks André,
Indeed, you are correct that Production Mode can detect a problem when
attempting to parse out a null value. This I already knew :) The problem
lies a little deeper...
Hopefully others can help me with this plase :)
1) This HostedModeException is very annoying. Null (or in
Thank's again André :)
I've made some progress. you'r suggestion to use Integer and not
primitive int was bang on the mark! :) Unfornately autoboxing was masking
some of my problems - but now I have learnt the error's of my ways :)
Now I am happily using Integer with and without null
Dear GWT Steering Commitee,
This is feedback, please take it objectively! Your maven support to date can
only be described as careless. There is a *large* community need you as much
as you need them.
Cheers :)
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Frederic Conrotte
frederic.conro...@gmail.com
I don't want a div - as you point out this won't work... I would like to
create a tr from UiBinder (with no div wrapping it).
Cheers.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 juin, 11:14, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean
for the suggestion tho.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Chris Boertien chris.boert...@gmail.comwrote:
wrap it with g:HTML or g:HTMLPanel
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
I want a template that produces a tr. The following doesn't work, but
it's
What do you mean by parsing? Is this done by the UiBinder parsing the ui.xml
templates to generate impl code?
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 juin, 17:22, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
I want a template that produces a tr
I don't entirely understand everything you have said reading between the
lines I think there's some information that could be helpful (but I might be
wrong)
Gin won't change your architecture or the MVP pattern, but it does
drastically reduce boilerplate. A common problem with many
I want a template that produces a tr. The following doesn't work, but it's
what I was hoping for...
!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM http://dl.google.com/gwt/DTD/xhtml.ent;
ui:UiBinder xmlns:ui=urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder
xmlns:g=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui
tr
tdg:Label
Yeah, the one problem with UiBinder and MVP is this pattern collision
UiBinder says, view are directly attached to views.
MVP says, view's are attached to presenters, if you want to chain views the
presenters control this.
Consequently, you can't get UiBinder to create your @UiFields (i.e.
,
On Jun 22, 3:36 pm, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost all of the problem's listed below are bad advice and I suggest
you
disregard them.
Do you, or others, have any valid arguments (opinions are no valid
arguments)
I am not going to do things the wrong or the poor way just
Almost all of the problem's listed below are bad advice and I suggest you
disregard them. Except for the it's a graphic designer mindset - this
statement is correct. Thankfully we no longer need to code our layout and
style in java!
The main problem I have with UiBinder is that when you try and
=Panel Title /
/g:SimplePanel
g:Label text=content goes here/g:Label
/g:VerticalPanel
/g:DecoratorPanel
/ui:UiBinder
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'd really like to re-use the .gwt-DialogBox .Caption style outside of a
DialogBox. We have
Hi Guys,
I'd really like to re-use the .gwt-DialogBox .Caption style outside of a
DialogBox. We have a bunch of widgets and raw html inside UiBinder that we'd
like to have styled the same way (for consistency of course).
Here's a BROKEN example:
!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM
Create your maven project like this..
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/user-guide/archetype.html
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/user-guide/archetype.htmlThen
run the dev mode with the goal 'gwt:run'
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Subhrajyoti Moitra subhrajyo...@gmail.com
Thanks Thomas, that's a really concise and helpful response :)
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 mai, 04:27, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm told that dev mode run's directly against java classes. Could I
expect
reduced
Hi,
I'm told that dev mode run's directly against java classes. Could I expect
reduced compile+build times by specifying my specific user.agent when
running in dev mode? Is the user.agent even used when running in dev mode?
Cheers.
p.s. example: Firefox Only (from gwt.xml):
set-property
, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've having a look at the source for the GWT Showcase
samplehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/#svn/trunk/samples/showcase.
For the purposes of good and not evil I grabbed all the source and dragged
it out into my own
Hi All,
I've having a look at the source for the GWT Showcase
samplehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/#svn/trunk/samples/showcase.
For the purposes of good and not evil I grabbed all the source and dragged
it out into my own project. However, I am unable to resolve a
Hey,
My advice would be to focus more on a server side solution and not GWT
(javascript). Your application server (tomcat, jetty, websphere, glassfish,
jboss... or maybe even httpd - whatever you are using) would have the
ability to secure url's. It also has the ability to prompt for passwords,
There is quite a serious collision between the MVP pattern and the (super
cool) UiBinder.
Presenters don't know what their concrete view is, all they know is the view
interface has a asWidget() method. This seems like a logical separation. MVP
says presenters shouldn't know HOW they are visually
Hi Guys,
Sure, it's easy with UIBinder to add an anonymous/on the fly child
widget without declaring '*...@uifield Label blah;*' in the java class or *'**
ui:Field=blah' *in the ui.xml template.
For example, here there is no '*...@uifield Label blah;*' in the java class and
there is no
images aren't from css but
instead are part of a ResourceBundle. Look in at the top of the Tree
class, you'll see the default ImageAdapter which refers to the png
files in com.google.gwt.user.client.ui/doc-files.
On Apr 5, 11:31 pm, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like
I think this was a bug, try 2.0.3 and please let others know if this fixes
your problem :)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:05 AM, lineman78 linema...@gmail.com wrote:
I just compiled this and the problem seems to only exist in hosted
mode.
On Apr 5, 2:25 pm, lineman78 linema...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to re-use some of the image's found in GWT's default theme.
Specifically, I need a reference to the + and - png's that are found on
tree lists.
See them here: http://gwt.google.com/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html#!CwTree
How can I reference these images from CSS and from
Thanks István,
This sucks, really sucks! If you want to run best fit gwt gui's for
mobile, desktop, 16:9, 4:3, 5:4 screens then you are going to encounter
serious problems. We're not facing these problems, but we will have
different widget's appearing depending on ACL roles (and hence the layout
Considering we use the g: panel's and widgets and provide our own
customized unique ui.xml (in a different location). It would seems highly
likely.
Maybe the GWT source code is worth a look to see how it does it.
You could try putting the MapWidget inside and AbsolutePanel.
FWIW: MapWidget's tend to dislike dynamic layout / rezising. Without knowing
how the bindings are applied at runtime it *could* be affecting this.
For this reason you will find two methods:
guess: perhaps it's the order in which the css files are listed and thus
loaded.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Pico zurmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm quite new to GWT. I'm currently facing an annoying issue with the
standard css overriding my own one no matter what.
In reference
hi,
might I suggest you take a look at this in firebug (or chrome's debug
console). It should allow you to see if the css has been loaded. If it has
not, then there is no style to apply (the browser does not consider this to
be an error).
on the other hand, I think client bundles now have the
use divs! The first row will fit its height to
its contents. In that case you can assign the second row some fixed
height.
Chris
On Feb 23, 11:32 am, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks István,
This sucks, really sucks! If you want to run best fit gwt gui's for
mobile
well with dynamic sizing using non-UIBinder
GUI layout.
On Feb 23, 5:44 am, Andrew Hughes ahhug...@gmail.com wrote:
You could try putting the MapWidget inside and AbsolutePanel.
FWIW: MapWidget's tend to dislike dynamic layout / rezising. Without
knowing
how the bindings are applied
Hi All,
I've got...
myWidget.setSize(100%,100%);
The actualy size of this can change dynamically, as it's a % and not
absolute. For example:
+ other content is added to the dom
+ the css style is changed
+ a split panel is moved by the user
+ the browser window size changes --- ignore this, we
Any improvements in GWT-Maven support from Google would be excellent! Google
are 'maven friendly' :) THANKS KEITH AND OTHERS!
I can't speak highly enough of Maven. It's an instant injection of mature
engineering practices for projects and companies alike. It's a shame it has
becoming
Thanks for everyone's replies. I'm still not sure what the fundemental
differences are between the 2.5 options above.
The following appears to be the case:
- GXT superseed's the GWT-Ext (as GWT-Ext is no longer under active
development), so really this concludes that GWT-Ext is not a
59 matches
Mail list logo
