You cannot send email from the client portion of a GWT application. You can
only email from the server side portion.
The errors indicate that you were trying to use javamail from the client
portion.
On Dec 27, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Ahmed Shoeib wrote:
> Compiling module com.fuoeg.testMail.TestMa
The remote service servlets used by RPC have code in them to prevent GET
requests from doing anything.
As was said before, if your images are small (or you don't care about IE) you
can return the image as a data URI (google is your friend here) and when you
get the response simply do: new Image
That's correct.
You only ever want to open a window as a direct result of a user action
(onClick, keypress, etc) otherwise you may run afoul of any popup blocker.
This means that you cannot open a window in a callback. That is asynchronous
that is not a direct result of a user action. If you n
You can't really use javax.mail on the client side, it isn't supported by the
emulation library.
you'd have to send your data to the server and use javamail from there.
-jason
On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Felipe Guarda wrote:
> Yes, i`m using javax.mail in the clientside code. where is the co
Form, etc) with GWT.
Jason Essington
Java Software Engineer
.
C A L Y P S O
215 West Pine St
Pinedale, WY 82941
OFFICE 307-367-2276
MOBILE 307-749-8788
.
www.calypso.com
This electroni
yes:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication.html
Jason Essington
Java Software Engineer
.
C A L Y P S O
215 West Pine St
Pinedale, WY 82941
OFFICE 307-367-2276
MOBILE 307-749-8788
I'd be inclined to believe that this interface started life as an abstract
class, and at some point the developer decided that it could be an interface
instead. Thus the declaration was changed but the abstract modifiers were not
removed.
I think that there were no more nefarious intentions tha
if the location of your gwt.xml file isn't at the same level as your client
package then you need to add a tag to tell it where the client
directory is. That's the likely reason it can't find your entry point class.
so probably the simplest thing to do would be to move the gwt.xml file to
src/
I'm using Eclipse 3.5 on Snow Leopard with the Google plugin for Eclipse on
both a MBP and a MacPro and they both seem to work just fine.
-jason
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Eclipse 3.5 with the GWT plugin for 3.5 and webkit 2.0.
> I'm using MyEclipse 8.0
Are you compiling on one platform using output style Obfuscated and on the
other with Detailed? That is the only thing that I could think of that would
make a difference.
-jason
On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:05 AM, hasan wrote:
> Hi,
> I have noticed a behavior that happens consistently and I can't
> e
Do not use the built in server, use your own (properly configured) instance of
tomcat, and uncheck the "run built in server" checkbox in the run configuration.
-jason
On Dec 31, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Matt wrote:
> When it will be deployed to out Tomcat server, some of the JARs
> conatining code tha
I can't think of a single usecase where it would be appropriate to load a
module twice ... It would be effectively the same as loading YUI, or Dojo, or
jQuery twice, Once it is there the first time there's no need to load it again,
the code is already there.
If you are simply trying to place a
As long as the protocol (http/https) server (localhost) and port (3000) are the
same, just use the url ... (/admin/login/)
if protocol port or server change then you violate SOP (same origin policy) and
the browser prevents the call.
-jason
On Dec 28, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Paulo Coutinho wrote:
Also have a look at how PopupPanel or DialogBox use Animation for an example.
-jason
On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:24 PM, pohl wrote:
> Absolutely. If another javascript manages to do something in a
> browser, then you can do it in GWT. A good starting place would be
> to look at is the following cl
Have you tried the HTML widget? Label is for text (setInnerText) and HTML is
for HTML (setInnerHTML)
-jason
On Dec 14, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Dennis Madsen wrote:
> Have I completely misunderstood something? There must be a way of
> doing so.
>
> On 13 Dec., 23:04, Dennis Madsen wrote:
>> I have
DateTimeFormat from the I18N module should do what you want.
-jason
On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to compare two calendar dates (Strings with just day, month and
> year) for equality but it would be nice if there existed a formatter
> that I can use on the clien
That is simply a packaging question, not really a GWT question ...
Simply add your .war file to your ear and specify that it is there in
your application.xml file
-jason
On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:47 AM, iaio81 wrote:
> Hi all,
> Iìve deployed GWT as WAR in JBOSS and EJBS as jars, I would put all
>
In general you seem to be talking about attacks that would be handled
by the browser's "Same Origin Policy". This does segregate js loaded
from different places to prevent that sort of thing.
but if the uses shouldn't have the data, then you shouldn't have sent
it in the first place. rememb
Since javascript doesn't provide a way to minimize a browser window,
you aren't going to be able to do it in GWT.
In fact, any time you attempt to move, resize or close a window that
is not a direct result of user action, AND an expected result from
that action you are going to upset your u
My favorites are "GWT in Action" by Rob Hanson and Adam Tacy, and
"Google Web Toolkit Applications" by Ryan Dewsbury
Unfortunately both of these were published over a year ago, so GWT has
undergone some changes since then. They do have some very good
information, but things in the GWT world
You'll want to compile with -style PRETTY to see what "g" really is.
The default obfuscated code is not going to help you debug at all.
-jason
On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:19 AM, golfdude wrote:
>
>
> gwt 1.7...
>
> I have an app which works fine in hosted mode but when I compile/
> browse to Minefie
Sounded to me like it does the same thing that the
[modulename].nocache.js file does. only it does it on the server
rather than in the client, reducing the number of connections
required, as well as the bytes transferred.
-jason
On Oct 24, 2009, at 11:56 PM, balachandra maddina wrote:
> H
try Gilead, I believe that is the new name of that project.
-jason
On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:36 PM, rernst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does Hibernate4GWT support GWT 1.7? I only saw mention up to 1.5.
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
en this sort of thing
recently with their accounts.
-jason
On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Jason Essington --
>
> Your account has apparently been compromised, and is being used to
> post spam to this list.
> >
--~--~-~--~~~--
I just noticed that there were several spam messages in my Gmail
"sent" box that came to this group over the last couple of days.
Very odd indeed, but I believe that I've remedied the situation.
Apologies for not noticing this earlier.
-jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
I create User Defined Libraries GWT_DEV and GWT_USER so the classpath
and project point to those names, and on each platform those libraries
are configured to point to that actual jar files.
-jason
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Mary-Anne Wolf wrote:
>
> I am contributing to an Open Source pr
does Document.toString() give you something you can use on the server
side?
-jason
On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Parmeet Kohli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>I'm using the XMLParser class provided by GWT to create modify an
> XML document on the client side. I need to use the JAVA
> TransformerFactory an
That violates SOP (Same Origin Policy) so your browser won't let it
happen.
you would have to load your host page from that site to allow RPC to
connect.
XMLHTTPRequests (of which RPC is) must connect to the same host, port
and protocol from which the host page was loaded.
-jason
On Sep 1
how about Document.get().getElementById()?
the DOM one is deprecated
-jason
On Sep 1, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Thad wrote:
>
> Why does DOM.getElementById() return null while $doc.getElementById()
> in a JNSI method return a value?
>
> I'm trying to add a logon form to my welcom-file HTML (as mentione
libraries like commons-upload allow you to iterate each form element
whether file or input or whatnot, so just iterate until you've got all
the files.
-jason
On Sep 1, 2009, at 8:59 AM, huy wrote:
>
> how does the back-end differentiate the files?
> >
--~--~-~--~~~-
"id":"25" vs "id":25?
what is actually supplied in your JSON? the first is a string, the
second a number
if you are getting the first, then your server side serializer is
mucking things up for you.
-jason
On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:30 AM, jaimon wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> i am using GWT and JSON.
Your database code should not be located in any *.client.* package.
-jason
On Aug 27, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Tom wrote:
>
> I am trying to compile the java class SlicrPopulatr, found here:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-ad-gwt2/index.html?S_TACT=105AGX44&S_CMP=EDU
>
> The following e
you can add additional file upload widgets to the same form and all
files will be sent with the single submit
-jason
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:19 PM, huy wrote:
>
> Is it possible to upload multiple files at one time? FileUpload will
> only allow selection of one file so I'm not sure how to do t
yeah, try:
return eval('('+json+')');
On Aug 26, 2009, at 8:24 AM, r4nd wrote:
>
> Hi, I am new at working with overlay type and JSON
>
> I have a JSON string,
>
> {"enableCompose":true}
>
> and I have a overlay type
>
> import com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptObject;
> public class Config
By default, GWT already loads itself into an iFrame. I believe that
the XS linker does that as well. You don't need to do anything extra.
-jason
On Aug 24, 2009, at 3:05 AM, John O'Conner wrote:
>
> I've searched the GWT discussion group, but I haven't found an answer.
> As a newb with GWT, I
Move the GWT libraries up in your classpath. They should be right
after your source directory and before anything else.
-jason
On Aug 21, 2009, at 9:11 AM, dm3sol wrote:
>
> I was searching for this error over this group and did not find
> similar issue, so I thought this is a note for the ot
This might shed some light on your weird [not so much a] bug:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f/3be719c021aa19bd
-jason
On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Luke wrote:
>
> I wouldn't normally ask things like this but I have something weird
> going
right, you need to read:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f/3be719c021aa19bd
Now, what you'd get as a return from you method is not at all what you
would expect.
myVariable will NEVER be set by the time you exit the method.
-jason
On Aug 1
have you tried
border-collapse: collapse;
in your css?
-jason
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Tobe wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a FlexTable with some rows and used setStyleName() to set a
> background-color from a CSS file. I also set margin and border to 0 in
> the CSS file for all elements, bu
It sounds like the firewall doesn't like the html file that is
composed entirely of javascript. If you have access to the IT
departments that run those firewalls, perhaps you could request that
they disregard that rule for your particular sites.
If that isn't possible you could maybe try us
Javascript is single threaded, so the event code has to wait its turn.
If a tight loop or something is running, the event's code won't
execute until the loop is finished.
If you need events to fire in the middle of long running processes (or
simply don't want the browser to act frozen) plac
wouldn't it be easier (and perhaps faster) to do something like:
RootPanel rp = RootPanel.get("sample");
rp.clear(); // remove any widgets to be safe
rp.getElement().setInnerHTML(""); // and clear any remaining contents
-jason
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Thamizharasu S wrote:
>
> Hi P
RPC data is not synchronous, meaning an object moving from the client
to the server (javascript to java) looks different than one moving
from the server to the client (java to javascript).
This complicates attempting to perform a java to java type of
scenario. That said, it is not impossibl
BigDecimal is not emulated in GWT and thus cannot be compiled to
javascript.
Have a look at what is available to you:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/RefJreEmulation.html
-jason
On Jul 28, 2009, at 11:55 PM, akshi wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am using GWT as a beginner and at the time
One sort of sneaky trick that could be helpful with overlay types
would be to do something like:
public native String getStringField(String fieldName)/-{
return (fieldName != null && this[fieldName] != undefined) ?
this[fieldName] : null;
}-*/;
It isn't as convenient as getThis() or getTh
Uhm hosted mode is IE, FF, or Safari depending upon the platform ...
That said, do you also get the error on Safari?
-jason
On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
>
> This may be a dumb question, but since you didn't mention hosted
> modehave you tried it under hosted mode as w
I have to say, in all of the environments that I have access to my
image bundles work fine, BUT there is one machine at a client's
location that does not display them!
I have thus far been unable to replicate this situation, so haven't
been able to chase it myself.
-jason
On Jul 17, 2009,
yes, it is only for development (HostedMode) and only on OS X.
-jason
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:07 PM, henryhbk wrote:
>
> I have a question about the license of GWT. In the description it
> "includes" webkit. Now my assumption is that this is based on the
> pseudo web environment in eclipse that yo
Nope, GWT creates a monolithic javascript payload from all of the
modules that are inherited by the compiled module.
-jason
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Sky wrote:
>
> By following the approach that Fred outlined, does that create
> multiple .js files and do they only get downloaded when the
id module name: 'http://site.com/..'
>
> But it works when I hit the URL on my browser... do I need to set up
> my Tomcat server differently?
>
>
> On Jul 6, 6:21 pm, Jason Essington wrote:
>> it is simply -noserverhttp://myserver.com/myHostpage.html
>>
&
the lines of:
> -noserver IPaddress -p port com.module/module.html
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2:59 pm, Jason Essington wrote:
>> That is pretty much exactly what -noserver is for. you can debug and
>> even change your client code and have it execute against any remote
>> server (whe
That is pretty much exactly what -noserver is for. you can debug and
even change your client code and have it execute against any remote
server (whether that is on your local machine or even a production
server).
-jason
On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:54 AM, justin choi wrote:
>
> I've been explori
Or it could just be IE's wonderful (read broken) box model
implementation.
-jason
On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:39 PM, max3000 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> GWT seems to render components too big in IE. This can be seen simply
> by navigating to the GWT showcase. Make sure the zoom is reset (100%).
>
> It is obv
It is quite possible that the javascript engine in that browser is
limited in what it is capable of doing compared to the current
generation of engines. This would make the simple approach (new user
agent and defining a new deferred binding specific to that browser)
simply impossible.
But
Have you looked at the file that you think is obfuscated to make sure
it actually is?
7M sounds pretty big, and typically PRETTY is not a bit larger than
OBF but rather dramatically larger.
Do you get an error with style PRETTY as well?
-jason
On Jun 25, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Senton wrote:
>
just remember, you have to do this as a direct result of a user action
(button click for example) otherwise any popup blocker will prevent
the window from opening.
Attempting to open a window from within a DeferredCommand, or as a
result of an XHR callback will fail if popup blockers are ena
Primarily it seems you haven't fully understood the bootstrapping
process in GWT.
the *.js file is simply to discover which browser is being used and it
triggers the load of one of the *.cache.* (js or html depending) files
that contains javascript code that is tailored specifically for tha
I'd be inclined to believe that an RPC sent in onWindowClosing() would
work though you wouldn't get any response.
If you don't cancel the window close event then the page should be
unloaded and the code would be gone. The asynchronous nature of the
call to the server would suggest that the r
At this point I believe that Java5 is the default on OS X
-jason
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:45 AM, hojberg wrote:
>
> wow cool, but is the java sdk the right version ? the guide said i
> needed version 5 which is 32bit instead of the 64bit version 6 ?
>
> - hojberg
>
> On Ju
if you have installed the developer tools that came with your mac,
then you have ant installed, and as luck would have it all macs come
with java pre installed
-jason
On Jun 17, 2009, at 4:11 PM, hojberg wrote:
>
> So i tried to setup gwt for mac from the guide (i dont want to use
> eclipse)
Not easily, the server side components reject GET request outright.
And you'd have to handle URL size limitations and such for the
parameters you send with the GET.
Though it is possible to hack RPC work via get, you would probably be
better off using RequestBuilder and JSON or some such.
-
perhaps this little discussion would be of some help:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f/3be719c021aa19bd
-jason
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:05 AM, retha pasalli wrote:
>
> Hi Mr. Kushner,
>
> Thx for your reply. I've tried to call the service from
of type Node. This compiles OK, but at run time I get
> an exception on the appendChild call.
>
> How can I add or append an element to a node like this?
>
> Secondly..I can't seem to find any wrap method in the Widget class?
>
> Any further insight would be greatly appreci
Images widgets at their core contain a DOM element and you can't have
an element in two places at once.
However the beauty of ImageBundle is that it caches that actual image
so you don't incur additional bandwidth when you create multiple image
widgets using the same image bundle.
-jason
Probably the safest thing to do would be to insert an element, then
use the widget's .wrap() method to "promote" that element to a widget.
there are other ways, but they are prone to leaking memory.
-jason
On Jun 10, 2009, at 1:36 PM, peterk wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm walking the DOM tree
it isn't the callback methods, but rather the return type of the
method in your Async Interface
so rather than
void doSomething(AsyncCallback cb);
it would be
Request doSomething(AsyncCallback cb);
Though I believe that is only available from GWT 1.5 on
-jason
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:
Try trunk rather than the OOPHM branch. I believe that the most
current OOPHM code is located there. Though you may still need to grab
the browser plugins from the older branch.
-jason
On Jun 10, 2009, at 2:20 AM, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
>
> Ok,I built OOPHM according to this:
> http://alla
Which version of IE? IE 6 doesn't really support PNG transparency, and
requires an activeX hack which may implode with the effects.
-jason
On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:31 PM, mrpantsuit wrote:
>
> I'm actually using the GWT Widget Library's Effect class, which has an
> Effect.appear(Widget) method.
search for OOPHM on this list
-jason
On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
>
> Dear GWT community,
>
> Is there a (relative easy way) to replace the GWTs hosted mode browser
> for linux systems? The provided Mozilla 1.7.2 is a 5 year old thing
> anyway.
>
> In particular I need EX
regular JDBC access isn't allowed in App engine either.
If you weren't intending on creating an App Engine project, deselect
the "Use Google App Engine" checkbox in the project properties dialog,
Then you'll be able to use both JNDI and JDBC.
-jason
On Jun 8, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Jason Parekh w
Client side GWT is bound by what is allowed by the browser's
Javascript sandbox, and file io is decidedly NOT allowed, and therefor
not emulated in GWT.
There have been various projects that use Flash, or java applets to
work around that restriction, but those are no panacea either.
File u
I was under the assumption that any of the static DOM methods should
be eschewed in favor of the methods in the Element overlay types
(where they exist).
so Element.getStyle().setProperty() vs. DOM.setStyleAttribute()
Though both should currently work
-jason
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Ad
you mean like element.getStyle().setProperty("backgroundColor",
"#FF");
-jason
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ganaga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Doing a Element.setAttribute("style", "background-color: #ff")
> works fine in Firefox but has no effect in IE.
>
> Is there any work around for changi
You can use eval() from JSNI to execute javascript strings rather than
trying to inject them into the HTML.
-jason
On Jun 3, 2009, at 9:13 AM, JF wrote:
>
> Let's say i have a String js = "
Is performing an eval on arbitrary code from an untrusted source
(client in this case) a good idea?
It seems like it would be a rather large security breach in your
application (depending upon what else you app does I suppose)
It just sounds naughty to me.
-jason
On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:50 P
you could check out the JSci project
http://jsci.sf.net
And adjust the bits you need. I generally do that sort of thing on the
server, but I don't see any reason why you couldn't do it on the
client if you wanted.
-jason
On May 31, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Dan W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an app
UHM ... that question is a bit confused.
GWT is the Toolkit in which GWT-EXT exists. without GWT there is not
GWT-EXT.
the EXT variants (GWT libraries based on EXT) seem to be rather
popular, but also seem to have more than their fair share of detractors.
You can search the list for informa
You have to remember that GWT is not a single solution for creating a
web site. It is (or rather can be) just one part of the whole system.
GWT primarily performs DOM modification and XMLHTTP requests (with
lots of other fancyness that makes those tasks much easier for the
developer). Thes
You cannot keep data encrypted on the client if you expect to allow
the client to use it. Anything that you want to protect from the user
should never leave the server.
for instance DVD and HD-DVD and BlueRay all attempt to keep their
formats encrypted from the user, but the user is require
.
>
> 2009/5/28 Jason Essington
>
>
> Thread is not part of java that is emulated in GWT. Javascript is
> single threaded so thread.sleep() has no meaning, you might as well do
> while(true); (I don't actually suggest doing that)
>
> What is it that you are trying to ac
Use the GWT timer for that
-jason
On May 28, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Adil BENHAMID wrote:
> as an example I want to display a button then wait two seconds
> before displaying the next one.
>
> 2009/5/28 Adil BENHAMID
> I would like to to make a temporization between two calls.
>
Thread is not part of java that is emulated in GWT. Javascript is
single threaded so thread.sleep() has no meaning, you might as well do
while(true); (I don't actually suggest doing that)
What is it that you are trying to accomplish with Thread.sleep()?
-jason
On May 28, 2009, at 10:37 AM,
If you are using the Google Eclipse Plugin, is your project marked as
an appengine project?
If so, you'll want to unselect that option to use a regular database.
-jason
On May 28, 2009, at 3:01 AM, SmartGWT_D wrote:
>
> Hi, did you find a solution for your problem, because I've the same.
> A
perhaps you could use GWT.isClient() to decide which implementation to
use, the GWT version in a GWT environment or the java version in a JVM?
-jason
On May 27, 2009, at 12:30 AM, TimOnGmail wrote:
>
> Hi all...
>
> I have a class that I'd like to use in GWT, and have it work both in a
> free
when you declare a parameter as Object (or in this case Object[]) GWT
would be forced to discover every possible serializable object in the
classpath and make a serializer for it. This is particularly
inefficient, so it is better to use a more specific subclass of Object.
-jason
On May 20,
I have no idea what either of you said
On May 13, 2009, at 4:13 PM, salvador.ce wrote:
> Da para escrever em Ingles ou Portugues ??
>
> 2009/5/13 kai.zhang@gmail.com
> 我新写了一个类，叫做B类，我想在A类里面调用B类，却报错了，请问应该如
> 何操作？
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Salvador
> Consultor BI / SAP BW BPS
> 021-8426-8120
>
you could try increasing the jvm stack size with the -Xss switch and
see if that doesn't help
-jason
On May 13, 2009, at 12:56 PM, stefan asseg wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>
> i am migrating our open source web desktop framework
> http://code.google.com/p/hetras-gwt-framework/ to 1.6 and it works
> fine
Sure, just fire up the compiler or hosted mode with an invalid option
and it'll list all of the valid ones in the console for you. It is
really helpful that way :-)
-jason
On May 12, 2009, at 4:18 PM, rjcarr wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link, but is there a page somewhere that just shows all
>
Looks like your servlet mapping is incorrect.
Either change your @RemoteServiceRelativePath to "test/gwt" OR your
servlet mapping to "/gwt"
-jason
On May 12, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Rod wrote:
>
> I have two classes on client , one named POST, and second POSTAsync.
> In POST I have "@RemoteService
Don't know what to tell you man, it is WoMM Certified*
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
CAREFUL! If you do your processing in an RPC remoteServiceServlet,
then in onSuccess() you window.open using a particular URL to fetch
the generated file your users (well non-IE users anyway) will never
see that file.
Popup blockers will prevent the opening of a window that is not a
direc
From a java perspective, Serialization implies a contract that GWT
(or more specifically Javascript) cannot fully uphold, so originally
the developers created IsSerializable which implies the subset of the
Serialization contract that could be upheld.
As GWT progressed, it turned out that t
ssuming your static content was in a subdirectory of the public
>>> directory (?). And now you will need to have WEB-INF/lib inside
>>> your
>>> WebContent dir?
>>
>>> I will need to do migrate to1.6sometime, and I just don't like the
>>> w
The problem is that an object cannot exist in two locations at the
same time ... Really, don't you wish you could be at the bar, at the
same time you are at home fixing the dishwasher (you're happy, wife's
happy)?
The same applies to DOM your | cannot be in two places at
once, you can cre
Your underlying service could be just about anything, but use the
RemoteServiceServlet to expose that service to GWT via RPC then SOAP
or JSON or whatever to expose it to non-GWT clients.
Basically you use the RemoteServiceServlet to handle object
serialization and just pass the objects on
Hosted mode is a strange beast. most of the java code runs in hosted
mode as java, and executes faster than it would in your browser (IE),
but if you have to cross the java/javascript boundary then you end up
with a pretty big performance hit where the code will execute much
slower than in
GWT is just one part of a complete web application. Typically for a
large app you might use some sort of CMS on the server, and use GWT to
perform dynamic client side stuff.
It is not necessary to use any additional frameworks like SmartGWT or
the EXT variants with GWT, but they seem to be
So, you click save, then each field is validated individually via an
RPC?
One trick is to chain your RPC Calls. I have an abstract Callback that
implements Command and also has a field to hold an additional Command.
CommandCallback the execute() method is able to Fire the RPC that is
hand
Anchor a = Anchor.wrap(ae);
a.addClickHandler(myHandler);
-jason
On Apr 24, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:
>
> It is straightforward to find an id-labelled element in the DOM by for
> example a command such as
>
> AnchorElement ae = Document.get().getElementById("link1");
>
> Now I want
setValue()
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:09 PM, Danny wrote:
>
> setChecked() seems to be depreaciated by GWT 1.6. What replaces this
> action?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Danny
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
