Perfect! Thanks for the detailed and fast responses guys.
Richard.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
go
Hi guys,
A (hopefully easy) question: what is the GWT 'best practice' to take a
server-side DOM built with org.w3c.dom.Document and pass it over RPC?
Clearly once on the client-side it needs to become a
com.google.gwt.xml.client.Document, and I can achieve this by
serializing to and from a String
Sergio,
Thanks for your interest in Metawidget!
Metawidget is currently at v0.95, so it is not quite yet mature.
However it has already been used in several production GWT projects
and has decent documentation, examples, and test coverage. If you get
chance to give it a try, I'd be happy to help
Hi guys,
When unit testing a GWT app that uses servlets, it seems you cannot
use the 'real' servlet definition in your app's web.xml. Instead you
must put a 'servlet' element into your unit test's module.gwt.xml.
However, the module.gwt.xml 'servlet' element is not as capable as the
web.xml 'ser
Brilliant. Just what I needed.
Thanks!
On May 22, 6:20 pm, Adam T wrote:
> the following might
> help:http://groups.google.se/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread...
>
> //Adam
>
> On 22 Maj, 09:58, Richard Kennard
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi guys,
Hi guys,
In GWT 1.5 and earlier, I have been unit testing my click handlers as
explained on my blog here...
http://kennardconsulting.blogspot.com/2008/05/firing-onclicklisteners-in-gwt-unit.html
...this little hack no longer works in 1.6, because
FocusWidget::fireClickListeners is gone - replac
Hi guys,
Is TypeOracle.getType, which the JavaDoc says 'finds a type given its
fully qualified name', meant to work with parameterized qualified
names?
I've got a Generator that does...
typeOracle.getType( myType.getQualifiedSourceName() )
...and it works fine, but when I change it to...
type
Jason, Reinier,
Oh, okay. Wow. It works completely fine in hosted mode, but crashes
and burns in production mode. I guess I'll need to go back to using
generators.
Thank you both for your time, and for the heads up.
Regards,
Richard.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
Jason, Reinier,
Thank you both for staying with me. I'm still a bit confused as to
what you're saying versus what I'm finding works. In my project
(Metawidget) I have some code that needs to dynamically reflect and
invoke a method.
Prior to the above discussion, I implemented this by doing...
Reinier,
Thanks for your quick response.
I'm a bit confused, though. If...
> GWT compresses the java identifier of any method or field down to a very
> short random collection of symbols
...then how come I can still do...
o...@org.foo.foo::myMethod()();
...and even...
alert( obj[ '@org.foo
Dear All,
First, thanks for all your hard work on GWT. It really is a fantastic
framework!
Is there a reason why GWT-compiled JavaScript objects are not
'reflectable' like regular JavaScript objects are? When I do (in JSNI
JavaScript):
for( var s in obj )
{
alert( obj[s] );
}
I don't see an
Dear All,
First, thanks for all your hard work on GWT. It really is a fantastic
framework!
Is there a reason why GWT-compiled JavaScript objects are not
'reflectable' like regular JavaScript objects are? When I do (in
JavaScript):
for( var s in obj )
{
alert( obj[s] );
}
I don't see any pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
