Re: Dealing with session timeout and container managed security

What do you mean by server push? Could you maybe elaborate on your approach a little, thanks. On Mar 6, 5:11 pm, Rakesh rake...@gmail.com wrote: we use server push for session time out and it works really great! On Feb 28, 1:26 am, marcelstoer mar...@frightanic.com wrote: Is there some

Re: Password Encryption

com.project.client.User implements java.io..Serializable plus the default constructor public User() {} Done. On Mar 6, 12:14 am, fatjack1...@googlemail.com fatjack1...@googlemail.com wrote: I am using GWT 1.5.3. How do I use Serializable? Eclipse produces an error when I try to implement

Re: Dealing with session timeout and container managed security

of the application, and his   progress is lost. This really aggravates customers by the way. -jason On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:30 AM, marcelstoer wrote: Hhhmm, the community being quiet can mean a lot of things...none are really positive. Was I talking about some dark GWT corners where no stable/proper

Re: Dealing with session timeout and container managed security

, 8:26 am, marcelstoer mar...@frightanic.com wrote: Is there some consensus or best practice in the GWT community as for how to deal with session timeout and container managed security? There are some pointers if you search for this subject, but some of the ideas are wild... In my case I use

Dealing with session timeout and container managed security

Is there some consensus or best practice in the GWT community as for how to deal with session timeout and container managed security? There are some pointers if you search for this subject, but some of the ideas are wild... In my case I use the Servlet container's built in security features for

Re: JDBC realm for form-based authentication in hosted mode

On Feb 5, 2:22 am, Sumit Chandel sumitchan...@google.com wrote: Hello everyone, I'm not very familiar with JDBC realm, but for starters, are you using hosted mode with the -noserver option (i.e., running hosted mode with your own custom Tomcat server that has JDBC realm configured?). No,

Does the GWT compiler have problems with Generics?

My *Async interface contains the following method signature: void reportsAvailableFor(Class? extends AbstractRow rowClass, AsyncCallbackBoolean callback); The method signature in the application i.e. Servlet interface likewise looks like: Boolean reportsAvailableFor(Class? extends AbstractRow

Re: Does the GWT compiler have problems with Generics?

Thanks for your quick reply. On Feb 8, 5:37 pm, Damien Picard picard.dam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Your class has to implement the interface com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable and you have to add a As of GWT 1.5 this is no longer required, implementing java.io.Serializable is

Re: JDBC realm for form-based authentication in hosted mode

On Jan 30, 6:39 pm, marcelstoer mar...@frightanic.com wrote: How do you use a JDBC realm for form-based authentication in hosted mode? Hosted mode and form-based authentication work just fine, but our JDBC realm isn't picked up by Tomcat? I have the realm configured in /my_Eclipse_project

JDBC realm for form-based authentication in hosted mode

How do you use a JDBC realm for form-based authentication in hosted mode? Hosted mode and form-based authentication work just fine, but our JDBC realm isn't picked up by Tomcat? -Marcel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

log4j in hosted mode swallows Spring and Hibernate statements

In http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/1870ed6575c95f7b/dd6dc12a67feeb02?lnk=gstq=log4j+hosted+spring#dd6dc12a67feeb02 an issue was raised (but not solved apparently) that we're seeing here too. In hosted mode we're only seeing the log statements from our own

Re: Client did not send nnn bytes as expected

On Dec 2, 10:13 am, Amit Kasher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Does anyone has any new insights about this issue? We've been investigating for over a year(!), and we seem to not be the only ones... http://tinyurl.com/5rqfp5 I was recently confronted with the very same exception but in a

Caching RPC calls with Servlet Filters

In thread http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/7824fc19faeecc32/37e0c085d3c0ccfb?lnk=gstq=rpc+caching#37e0c085d3c0ccfb some of you already discussed certain aspects of RPC caching. I intend to implement caching using a Servlet Filter. However, before even

Re: Form submitted twice?

On Sep 29, 11:54 am, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 sep, 21:26, marcelstoer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the code provided as an example inhttp://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/1.5/com/google/g... to build a form panel. However, the form seems to get

Form submitted twice?

I used the code provided as an example in http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/1.5/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/FormPanel.html to build a form panel. However, the form seems to get submitted twice as the Window.alert(The text box must not be empty); is executed twice. Any ideas

Multi project setup i.e. dependent projects

What's the most sensible way to create a multi project setup? I'd have a parent project with two modules and a number of child projects dependent on the parent project. Each of those child projects also provides two modules which inherit from the respective parent module and extend/overwrite