Absolutely the same problem after migrating to 2.0.
On 19 дек, 00:57, Raziel raziel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm migrating my application from GWT 1.7 to GWT 2.0, and
everything seems ok except for the warning below every time I
compile:
] Adding '69' new generated units
- clean EventBus implementation with transparents server-push events
On 19 Dic, 00:29, federico federico.mona...@gmail.com wrote:
- runtime modularity to avoid monolitic compilations
On 16 Dic, 18:01, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think
like ?
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:29 AM, federico federico.mona...@gmail.comwrote:
- clean EventBus implementation with transparents server-push events
On 19 Dic, 00:29, federico federico.mona...@gmail.com wrote:
- runtime modularity to avoid monolitic compilations
On 16 Dic, 18:01,
+1 for databinding
+1 for better grids
+1 for enterprise examples, (CRUD applications)
Why not isolate the event framework to use it in non GWT projects?
- Andrés
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
See http://www.jboss.org/errai
it has a heterogenous EventBus implementation (client GWT or Server),
uses Comet when available, etc
-Ray
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:29 AM, federico federico.mona...@gmail.com wrote:
- clean EventBus implementation with transparents server-push events
On 19
Websockets
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 19 déc. 2009 à 22:16, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com a écrit :
like ?
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:29 AM, federico
federico.mona...@gmail.com wrote:
- clean EventBus implementation with transparents server-push events
On 19 Dic, 00:29,
Hi,
I have just upgraded to gwt 2.0 and added an eclipse plugin for os x
10.4.11. Running in development mode, i was asked to download gwt-dev
plugin. After downloading it, the firefox doesn't start and crashes.
I then started firefox in safe mode and disabled all plugins and
removed the gwt
Hi ... we have a GWT 1.5 application that launches another GWT
application (plugin) in an iframe. The main application communicates
to the embedded plugin using JNI calls. We are trying to upgrade to
2.0 but have run into the following issues.
1) We can debug the main application via the browser
For now I'm using the GWT compile button of the eclipse plugin to
force a proper GWT 2,0 compile. This seems to work for me.
The problem must be that some older GWT compiler is been executed
somehow.
Alex
On Dec 14, 3:17 pm, Addy adityaka...@gmail.com wrote:
I cleanup after every build but
Hi,
I have just upgraded to gwt 2.0 and added an eclipse plugin for os x
10.4.11. Running in development mode, i was asked to download gwt-dev
plugin. After downloading it, the firefox doesn't start and crashes.
I then started firefox in safe mode and disabled all plugins and
removed the gwt
Hi,
I have just upgraded to gwt 2.0 and added an eclipse plugin for os x
10.4.11. Running in development mode, i was asked to download gwt-dev
plugin. After downloading it, the firefox doesn't start and crashes.
I then started firefox in safe mode and disabled all plugins and
removed the gwt
Hello, I'm working on a GWT 2.0 project with hibernate integration via
Gilead. When I try to load data from database (on GWT 1.7 everything
was working properly) I get this error Parameter 0 of is of an
unknown type 'java.lang.String/2004016611' and googling I've found
this thread.
I downloaded
FWIW, I get the same behavior. I did a quick fix by editing
the .launch and build.xml files so that .XstartOnFirstThread were
suppressed. OTOH, I'm kinda freaked out by this; would like assurance
that this is really a bug in the toolkit and that -XstartOnFirstThread
is really supposed to work.
Hello, I'm working on a GWT 2.0 project with hibernate integration via
Gilead. When I try to load data from database (on GWT 1.7 everything
was working properly) I get this error Parameter 0 of is of an
unknown type 'java.lang.String/2004016611' and googling I've found
this thread.
I downloaded
Which files did you edit?
On Dec 17, 11:59 am, Madprof kickingve...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, I get the same behavior. I did a quick fix by editing
the .launch and build.xml files so that .XstartOnFirstThread were
suppressed. OTOH, I'm kinda freaked out by this; would like assurance
that this
So, TreeImages is deprecated and I should use Tree.Resources...
Suppose that I have graphics to represent the tree bits. Could someone tell
me how to tell the tree to draw itself, and where to put the graphics in the
directory structure?
Thank you.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Jim,
A couple of questions:
-What version of Java 6 is installed on your machine (do a java -version to
find out)? Do you experience the same problem with a different version of
Java 6 (not sure if Apple allows you to have multiple minor JDK versions on
your system at the same time), or with
Hello,
I was wondering which library I should use for playing .wav sounds in
GWT 2.0.
Amir
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
Hi, I'm migrating my application from GWT 1.7 to GWT 2.0, and
everything seems ok except for the warning below every time I
compile:
] Adding '69' new generated units
] Validating newly compiled units
] [WARN] Warnings in 'generated://
3DE2D57126EAE7405EEA01A75D45584C
GWT 1.7 to GWT 2.0, and
everything seems ok except for the warning below every time I
compile:
] Adding '69' new generated units
] Validating newly compiled units
] [WARN] Warnings in 'generated://
3DE2D57126EAE7405EEA01A75D45584C/com/appiancorp/gwt/appbuilder/client
Hi Jim,
I was unable to reproduce this issue. I was using the following platform:
Mac OS X 10.5.8
Java 1.6.0_17
Eclipse - Java Edition, 64 bit, Cocoa (running with Java 1.6.0_17)
Now, here's the thing: -XstartOnFirstThread IS added the command-line, but
that is intentional; we did that so that
I am adding code splitting to an existing project.
I noticed some problems trying to run the application
compiled for the web, but opening the local copy of files.
So I tried this experiment:
Use 2.0 webAppCreator to make a simple project
(simple_project.html etc.)
Add the simple example of code
on a GWT 2.0 project with hibernate integration viaGilead.
When I try to load data from database (on GWT 1.7 everything
was working properly) I get this error Parameter 0 of is of an
unknown type 'java.lang.String/2004016611' and googling I've found
this thread.
I downloaded these two files
Jim,
One other question - are you using Eclipse's Development Mode View, or did
you set the USE_REMOTE_UI environment variable in your launch configuration
to disable it? If you did, I think I can see why you're running into
problems. We've got a bug in the plugin where we're not removing
-XstartOnFirstThread IS added the command-line, but that is intentional
Ahh, that's useful information! Would it be possible to make that a
configurable option?
I just generated the trivial Web Application Starter Project, and it
runs without generating those error messages. But I'm not sure
Arthur,
No, we are not closing DevMode. Our client app is not small.
Refreshing DevMode in 2.0 takes 20-30 seconds on a decent multi-core
workstation. Often, we are only able to refresh a handful of times
before we start running into out-of-memory exceptions and browser
crashes (FF 3.5.6). I
same problems unfortunately
2009/12/18 Brad Leupen qcomps...@gmail.com
Arthur,
No, we are not closing DevMode. Our client app is not small.
Refreshing DevMode in 2.0 takes 20-30 seconds on a decent multi-core
workstation. Often, we are only able to refresh a handful of times
before we
Thanks for the feedback Brad. We've talked internally about an idea for
instant compile where the workflow would be essentially like hosted mode,
except it would very quickly translate your code into JavaScript with zero
optimizations. It sounds like there might be some interest in this.
(Of
Scott,
That sounds great! It's reassuring to know y'all are thinking about
this. I know it's not an easy problem to solve.
Brad
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
shortly, you intend to make a kind of incremental compilationnot of course
in .class but .js. It seems good to me.
2009/12/18 Brad Leupen qcomps...@gmail.com
Scott,
That sounds great! It's reassuring to know y'all are thinking about
this. I know it's not an easy problem to solve.
Brad
--
- Wrap Google Closure Library (http://code.google.com/closure/
library/)
On 16 Dic, 18:01, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap?
--
Hey Brad,
Sorry about that, I've just seen a number of people in the IRC channel
asking about why DevMode was so slow and it turned out they had been
closing it after each check. I just wanted to throw that comment up
there for those that didn't know. I guess our apps haven't got to that
size
Has everyone responding in this thread been checking the issue
tracker, staring issues they want to see resolved, and entering new
issues where they don't yet exist in the tracker? I know several of
the requests mentioned in this thread are already in there.
Arthur,
It's a good tip, especially when hot swap tells you that you need to
restart. For our app, we resorted to creating sandbox GWT entry points
to develop widgets in isolation. This gave us usable compile/refresh
times but I still long for the days when I could just press F5 to
refresh the
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Brad Leupen qcomps...@gmail.com wrote:
Another wish list item: a less API-invasive approach to protecting
against XSRF attacks (see:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/web/security-for-gwt-applications
).
It seems to me that XSRF checks could
Hi all,
I wish the GWT team would focus on all the things that force us to use
such awful third-party libraries as Ext-GWT:
-more appealing built-in themes
-richer components, like data grids with remote pagination
-data binding
Ext-GWT is full of annoyances but it has good looking widgets,
Definitely, the most important thing for me is fix the bugs and above
all publish an excellent documentation and ...
+1 for Databinding Validation
+1 for a nice DataGrid
+1 for nicer widgets
Great job on GWT 2.0
On 16 dez, 10:42, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap
On 19/12/2009, at 3:29 AM, Mauro mauro.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely, the most important thing for me is fix the bugs and above
all publish an excellent documentation and ...
+1 for Databinding Validation
+1 for a nice DataGrid
+1 for nicer widgets
Great job on GWT 2.0
On 16 dez, 10
to see gwt-2.0 in maven central repo.
On 9 dez, 01:13, Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com wrote:
Hi Folks!
We have some very exciting announcements today. Please check out the
following blog post that covers the GWT 2.0 SDK, Google Plugin for Eclipse,
and -- brand new in GWT 2.0
. With the GWT 2.0 plugin
for Eclipse I can only see an option in development mode to Terminate
which is not a graceful shutdown and does not cause valueUnbound to be
fired. Am I missing something?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group
This would be nice for those who have a robust server side system in place.
Right now, we're definitely testing how the app reacts to a hard crash. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
The same problem.
We're facing this after upgrading to gwt 2.0.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
On 8 дек, 19:24, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez lfpg@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
We're using GWT 1.7 and I'm starting to experiment with 2.0 RC2 to
evaluate GWT.runAsync().
However, now as I
On Dec 18, 11:20 am, Yozons Support on Gmail yoz...@gmail.com wrote:
This would be nice for those who have a robust server side system in place.
Right now, we're definitely testing how the app reacts to a hard crash. :)
One thing I found is that using the reload web server option in the
eclipse
If you follow the second link, watch the video and you should
understand, as Maryan said.
The following paragraph is almost the same words Ray Ryan spoke at the
Google IO concerning MVC and MVP:
I keep saying MVP, MVP, MVP. And I did not say MVC. Now the odds
are that when you got out of the
Guys, thanks for the link to this video. It really opened my eyes! I am so
thankful!
2009/12/17 Joe joechahh...@gmail.com
If you follow the second link, watch the video and you should
understand, as Maryan said.
The following paragraph is almost the same words Ray Ryan spoke at the
Google
Hi Joe,
Thx for the details. actually, i did looked at ryan talk before. during
the session there were questions like if there is a working model which
working then why would shifting to this pattern be significant. well, i have
my ans for those then and now. and yes, MVP is a better pattern
Alexander and Balachandra, you are welcome anytime, i'm glad things
are clearer now.
And like you said, Bala, it depends on the context, sure if you
already have your application,
designed in MVC and it's working for you, sure no need to build the
whole application again in MVP.
However, if
to use)
There you can see all the logs messages you sent with GWT.log or other
log mechanisms and the exceptions and error messages.
GWT 2.0 rocks by the way!!
hope that helps,
Pablo
On Dec 16, 4:01 pm, karim ka...@oc.com wrote:
While using 1.7 all the Exceptions were displayed
running... is it DevMode or is it
GWTShell?
Are you talking about the Google Plugin for Eclipse? If you have a GWT 2.0
folder with a WAR directory, then it uses DevMode.
thx,
H
On Dec 11, 9:37 am, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. Please feel free file any
, in my spare time. If somebody with commit privs cares
to buddy up for design and review, please feel free to contact me on
or off list. :)
Oh, and woohoo GWT 2.0! Go team!
- Isaac
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks
SuggestBox
features, too, in my spare time. If somebody with commit privs cares
to buddy up for design and review, please feel free to contact me on
or off list. :)
Oh, and woohoo GWT 2.0! Go team!
- Isaac
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote
Version 2.0 tackled nearly all problems I had with GWT. Here is the
rest that keeps me from being fully productive with it:
- bidirectional UIBinder with mini expression language to completely
remove programmatic UI, e.g.:
MyWidget.java:
class MyWidget extends DataboundComposite{
public
+1 to widget improvements
+1 to removing listeners - though this is a breaking change on a minor
release?
+1 to bug fixes - all bugs, especially the ones I've starred :)
+1 to data binding + validation
On Dec 17, 5:28 am, DanielK dkim...@googlemail.com wrote:
Version 2.0 tackled nearly all
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
- incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it into multiple projects?
GWT 2.0 release is awesome, thanks
Ability to wire a set of related many entities in the data binding
declaration.
For example, an Account entity. An Account has a set of related many
AccountAddress entities.
The data-binding framework should be able to map these
AccountAddress entities to a set of nested form control groups
1) Databinding a la Adobe Flex (they have *by far* the best solution[1] I've
seen in all these toolkits). The GWT1.6 'HasValue' interface is a good starting
point for this, hopefully it mixes well with UiBinder.
2) Scala compiler!
3) Make Compiler commandline options available to the
+1 nice datagrid
+1 remove deprecated listeners
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
- remove actual UiBinder limitations
- supports printing using css media (so wrap themes around a @media
screen)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
hi,
here is my wishlist:
+1 UiBinder WYSIWYG Eclipse plugin
+1 DataBinding Validation
+1 DataGrid
+1 multiple window management framework
(forground/background like gwt-mosaic windowpanel (zIndex based),
docking, maximize, etc ...)
time
--
and enabling to load only some
features for a specific user
* ...
regards
Xavier
On 16 déc, 19:49, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
GWT 2.0 was so awesome, it'll be hard to top any of the new stuff with my
feature wishlist.
A few things I'd like:
- moving as many compiler properties
-A nice DataGrid (maybe an improvement of the one in the incubator
which works nice).
-Improve change-compile-refresh development experience (like Brad
Leupen said)
-Support (plugin) for an IDE other than eclipse (Netbeans, Idea) would
be nice.
GWT 2.0 rocks. Keep up the good work.
--
http
Here are the enhancements I would like to have in GWT :
* incremental compilation to have the same ease of use than with php or jsp
; we have for instance an internal application where we have merged php and
gwt, and (from the ease of modification point of view) it is always simpler
to make a
and review, please feel free to contact me on
or off list. :)
Oh, and woohoo GWT 2.0! Go team!
- Isaac
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM
Hello,
I'll make a single wish : definitely an enterprise-level datagrid
(sorting, paging, filtering and so on).
Congrats and Thanks
Jérôme
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
features, too, in my spare time. If somebody with commit privs cares
to buddy up for design and review, please feel free to contact me on
or off list. :)
Oh, and woohoo GWT 2.0! Go team!
- Isaac
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working
Would love to see out of the box distributed compilation. We're
supporting 8 languages which bumped our compilation time to more than
45 min for the whole project...
On Dec 16, 9:01 am, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On
i think GWT must provide css api for generate the css from java code
because java code is more manageable than css (usage tracking or
refactoring)
in my idea, GWT generate css on compile, not set on runtime.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I would love to see things to stabilize more than adding new features.
1) Improving the overall development experience.
- Faster compiler
- Faster DevMode
2) Improving tutorials and documentations, perhaps come up with a bit
of best practices.
- More articles about testing, how to automate tests
My wish list: More focus on making it easier to build powerful and
more elegant interfaces quickly...
1. Visually improved/Less Complex DataGrid (PagingScrollTable)
2. Improved support for animations
3. More/Improved Widgets (integrated from Incubator or elsewhere)
The grid issue is huge, and is
+1 DataGrid
On Dec 16, 12:01 pm, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap?
--
GWT is already really really fast for end users but speed of
development could use some work. I don't know how but speed of
development needs to be improved, specifically dev mode times.
On Dec 16, 10:01 am, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here
- Another vote for data binding + validation
- Rich datagrid component, similar to the PagingScrollTable in the
incubator
- Inbuilt support for server push (comet)
- We should be able to exclude methods from GWT compilation using an
annotation (e.g.: @GwtIncompatible). This would make it easier
What do folks here think is important?
+1 for faster DevMode startup.
I don't understand why it recompiles all Java classes again and
again, when Eclipse already has classes in output folder.
Plus performing JSNI code parsing and applying ASM converters
Would be great to cache all
the classes into the correct directory). If you make
server side changes, you can just click the Restart Server button
under the Jetty tab.
Furthermore, GWT 2.0 adds the -draftCompile flag which, according to
the GWT Blog
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-web-toolkit-20
+1 Databinding
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
- Junit 4 support would be one great addition, as writing JUnit 3
tests is really a pain
- the fake DOM structures that one of the GWT talks at Google IO talks
about would be great as well (for the purposes of testing)
- removing all the deprecated classes from the trunk (DevMode still
warns about
splitting it into multiple projects?
Yes,
It would be nice to clean up the scrolltable and put it in a separate
project.
GWT 2.0 release is awesome, thanks for all the great work!
I agree. Thank you!
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
it into multiple projects?
Also, take a look at http://code.google.com/p/gwt-pectin/ that is a
data binding and validation framework that uses HasValueT as basis.
It would also be neat with a Enablable interface to slap on everything
that has setEnabled.
GWT 2.0 release is awesome, thanks for all
, Throwable t) {
// ERROR
log(t.getMessage());
}
}
);
On Dec 15, 7:59 am, joe joe.krat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having an issue with GWT 2.0 requesting XML data from a C# self
hosted Web Service. Using the GET request tutorial
Hi,
I need to be able to install the devmode GWT 2.0 browser plugins so
that I can install it offline. Not all companies allow developers to
be connected to the internet from a development machine.
I downloaded the GwtDevPluginSetup.exe but it fails with 0x80072ee7.
I am not allowed to attach
to be able to install the devmode GWT 2.0 browser plugins so
that I can install it offline. Not all companies allow developers to
be connected to the internet from a development machine.
I downloaded the GwtDevPluginSetup.exe but it fails with 0x80072ee7.
I am not allowed to attach these machines
Hi Fabien,
I'm afraid you should build your GWT applications in MVP (Model - View
- Presenter) design pattern and not MVC (Model - View - Controller),
as stated by ray Ryan at Google IO 2009.
Check out these links:
http://supplychaintechnology.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/forget-mvc-use-mvp/
and
I have exactly the same problem. It would be nice to have completely
off-line instalation as well.
On Dec 16, 8:35 am, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to be able to install the devmode GWT 2.0 browser plugins so
that I can install it offline. Not all companies allow developers
Hi Joe,
Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
On Dec 16, 1:34 pm, Joe joechahh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fabien,
I'm afraid you should build your GWT applications in MVP (Model - View
- Presenter) design pattern and not MVC (Model - View - Controller),
as stated by ray Ryan at Google IO
When you do opt to run the built-in server, development mode takes a guess
at the what the startup URLs might be by looking at the root of your war
folder. As you have discovered that does not work if you opt not to run the
server. To get around this, you can add the -startupUrl YOUR_URL_HERE to
Welcome,
anytime mate :)
On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien fabien1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
On Dec 16, 1:34 pm, Joe joechahh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fabien,
I'm afraid you should build your GWT applications in MVP (Model - View
- Presenter)
Here you can read and see one example for use pureMVC and GWT
http://trac.puremvc.org/Demo_Java_MultiCore_GWT_EmployeeAdmin
We use this example as guide in our application.
2009/12/16 Joe joechahh...@gmail.com
Welcome,
anytime mate :)
On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien fabien1...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out the project GWT-Presenter.
It's really worth it !
Christian Goudreau
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Joe joechahh...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome,
anytime mate :)
On Dec 16, 4:30 pm, Fabien fabien1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks, I think it was I'm looking for :)
On
Hi Joe,
Could you tell me why is MVP is preferred over MVC please. i went through
the links given above but that isnt really giving why a presenter pattern is
preferred over a controller pattern? they explain what is MVP pattern.
Thank you,
bala.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Joe
yeah it looks like the link was butchered when I send the post.
http://www.gwtapps.com/doc/html/com.google.gwt.http.client.html
I have tried what you are using. However, after looking into the
problem more I see that Same Origin Policy seems to be my issue. It
looks like without using JSONP I
GWT 2.0 seems to be working ok here, but I've been noticing floods of
these error messages in the console:
2009-12-16 12:17:55.552 java[25151:13b03] *** -[NSConditionLock
unlock]: lock (NSConditionLock: 0x143e511a0 '(null)') unlocked when
not locked
2009-12-16 12:17:55.553 java[25151:13b03
Watch best practices from ray ryan to understand.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
While using 1.7 all the Exceptions were displayed in HostMode
window. I have migrated to GWT 2.0 and it looks great, however I do
not know where to locate exceptions generated by JavaScript.
I am using Eclipse plus GWT plugin and FireFox, Chrome and IE.
--
You received this message because you
and the exceptions and error messages.
GWT 2.0 rocks by the way!!
hope that helps,
Pablo
On Dec 16, 4:01 pm, karim ka...@oc.com wrote:
While using 1.7 all the Exceptions were displayed in HostMode
window. I have migrated to GWT 2.0 and it looks great, however I do
not know where to locate exceptions
But I don't see how to disable that option.
On Dec 16, 12:28 pm, Jim Douglas jdoug...@basis.com wrote:
GWT 2.0 seems to be working ok here, but I've been noticing floods of
these error messages in the console:
2009-12-16 12:17:55.552 java[25151:13b03] *** -[NSConditionLock
unlock]: lock
messages in the Development Mode
View, turn the log level up to TRACE in your launch configuration.
Actually I really like gwt 2.0 and also the eclipse plugin rocks! The
UiBinder support is awesome!
Glad to hear it.
Best - István
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda
What about roadmap?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hey Bruce,
GWT 2 has provided great features focusing on the hidden parts of the
iceberg (devmode, codesplitting, clientbundle, ...). It would be great to
focus 2.1 on the user experience and the visible part of the user
framework.
Here's my wish list :
0) More widgets/containers compliant with
GWT 2.0 was so awesome, it'll be hard to top any of the new stuff with my
feature wishlist.
A few things I'd like:
- moving as many compiler properties as possible into configuration properties
so we can build an instrumented release (with type cast checking, assertions,
emulated stack
601 - 700 of 1296 matches
Mail list logo
