Sorry, I was wrong.
Transitional without a URI will put your browser into quirks mode, with a
URI it will be in standards or almost standards mode. I got confused with
strict, which doesn't change if you miss out the URI.
'quirks' means 'with all the wrong stuff' - all those browser quirks you
I've given up on the original problem, setCellWidth() with percents.
I'm trying a new, hopefully simpler, direction but I have a new
problem.
I'm now just trying to get by with setPixelSize(). Here's my new
sample code. My first problem with the output is that I get a scroll
bar on the right.
I would guess that you missed a doctype - try
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
I think that might change things, maybe not for the better.
But the basic problem is what?
Forget the 'how' for a moment.
You want an HP with 2
Thanks. The new doctype changed the output but, as you guessed, the
effect is interesting but not what I wanted. The panels collapsed to
minimum size.
My basic problem is layout. I just need to nest panels without
unexpected results. I've given up on auto-resize. I'll either write
code to
Hi John,
Here's a working example of two labels in an HP which will stick at 30-70
wide and 100% high.
You *must* have the doctype, and you must put the html, body css in as css
not in code. Most of the rest can go in as css, but I've done it here for
clarity.
The code is arranged so that you
About the doctype...
Are you saying I need any doctype or I need the specific one you
suggested? I was using this from GWT 1.5.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Does GWT now suggest running in standard mode instead of quirk
mode? I was having better luck in
You
should be OK with that, it's what's recommended,isn't it. I haven't
gone too deeply into doctypes (for that read 'not at all, really')
it's the same as the one I mentioned, just that mine had the dtd
location - it's just the spec, really - you can download the 'loose'
one (for transitional)
Thanks Ian. I'll work on it a bit first and then try to restate it.
On Nov 5, 7:12 pm, Ian Bambury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Could you restate your problem as it is now.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
I'm back. I looked at gwt-ext but that doesn't look like a good
alternative for me. I was having good luck with layouts, the demo
page http://www.gwt-ext.com/demo/ is impressive but I would only
recommend gwt-ext it you are absolutely sure you'll never need to
deviate from the sample code in
Hi John,
Could you restate your problem as it is now.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
...or did you mean GXT and gwt-ext? Confusing, amen.
On Oct 22, 3:12 pm, JohnMudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, this is really confusing. I mean Ext GWT and
GWT-Ext.http://www.ongwt.com/post/2008/04/22/MyGWT-is-dead-Long-live-Ext-GWT
On Oct 22, 3:09 pm, JohnMudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I sidestep issues with these widgets by switching to MyGWT or gwt-
ext?
John
On Oct 18, 11:26 pm, JohnMudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, I got issue number 3000. Nice round
number.http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3000
On Oct 18, 11:14 pm, JohnMudd [EMAIL
Cool, I got issue number 3000. Nice round number.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3000
On Oct 18, 11:14 pm, JohnMudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to hand it to you, your changes (summarized below) do produce
the desired 50% height in the log message. But it's
Hi John,
Your basic problem is that you don't have an absolute height for anything in
there.
Any percentage of zero is zero and, depending on which browser you use, you
will get an override/default of some sort.
Another problem is that the bodyPanel doesn't have any content, and some
browsers
Thanks Ian,
To test the effect of using an absolute size I replaced this line:
basePanel.setSize(100%, 100%);
with this:
basePanel.setPixelSize(200, 200);
The new output in compiled mode still shows appPanel and bodyPanel
with the same dimensions.
root 1103 200
basePanel 200 200 --
OK,
One more guess...
You've only got one TD in your appPanel so it's going to fill the whole
height anyway.
If that doesn't fix it, I'll try running your code on my machine (Windows)
and see what happens in practice instead of theory - I'm good at fixing
things in theory :-)
Ian
Ok, I'm going to try GWT 1.5.
On Oct 17, 8:52 pm, Ian Bambury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK,
One more guess...
You've only got one TD in your appPanel so it's going to fill the whole
height anyway.
If that doesn't fix it, I'll try running your code on my machine (Windows)
and see what
Wow, here are the results from gwt-linux-1.5.3. What's so surprising/
frustrating is that layout seems so fundamental to me. How could this
not work as expected?
From 1.5 compiled mode:
root 1103 200
basePanel 200 200
logPanel 87 200 -- 87 is 30% of 200? (Not that ver 1.4 GWT did
better)
Try this. Works for me. You might need a doctype
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
root.add(basePanel);
basePanel.setSize(100%, 200px);
basePanel.add(logPanel);
basePanel.setCellWidth(logPanel, 30%);
basePanel.setCellHeight(logPanel, 100%);
19 matches
Mail list logo
