Do you have any numbers of how much this shrinks compiled output, as this
seems like a terrific change! Thanks for doing it :-).
Cheers,
Emily
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:21 PM, BobV wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:28 AM, BobV wrote:
> >
> http://google-web-to
The maven plugin now supports both "About" strategies ;-)
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:15 AM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
>> Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0,
>> it will make it hard for someone to discern just which
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
> Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0,
> it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is
> actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in
> the repo. It just seems like it'
That's right, and you can be sure I'll check the next version number.
Anyway, we still can use Jboss-like versionning : 1.6.0.final or 1.6.0.GA
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> Well, maybe the GWT guys can offer some guidance on how they plan to
> number 1.6 milestone rele
Well, maybe the GWT guys can offer some guidance on how they plan to
number 1.6 milestone releases. My only further comment is that there
is no reason why maven repo versions have to match GWT versions. I've
seen GWT artifacts named -rc1 in some maven repos. The GWT team
doesn't officially support
Please note 1.5.x history at
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4&q=&colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount
1.5.0 was RC1
1.5.1 was RC2
GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 !
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> I'm not responsible of the way goog
I'm not responsible of the way google guys name there jars !Anyway I'm not
sure you can publish same jar name at googlecode.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0,
> it will make it hard for someone to discern
Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0,
it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is
actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in
the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me.
-Ray
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at
This is the version number used by gwt guys themself :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1&q=1.6.0
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than -Dversion=1.6.0
>
> -Ray
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at
