Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Non-client apis and breaking changes

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > This is what the c.g.g.util is for AFAICT, with c.g.g.util.tools.shared > being for things usable "on server-side" (included in gwt-servlet); and as > a rule of thumb any class not listed in the javadocs we generate should be > considered "p

Re: [gwt-contrib] Where is gwt-customchecks.jar?

Thanks Michael! I will search it. - Andrés Testi El viernes, 18 de octubre de 2013 12:51:40 UTC-3, Michael Vogt escribió: > > Hello. > > I found it in the old svn repository. Sorry can't provide the link right > now, but you'll find it with your preferred search engine ;-) > > Hope this helps, >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Where is gwt-customchecks.jar?

Hello. I found it in the old svn repository. Sorry can't provide the link right now, but you'll find it with your preferred search engine ;-) Hope this helps, Michael -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[gwt-contrib] Where is gwt-customchecks.jar?

Where is the gwt-customchecks.jar file referred in eclipse/README.txt? Is it no longer required to configure codecheck? Thanks in advance. - Andrés Testi -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Non-client apis and breaking changes

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:53:46 PM UTC+2, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:21:48 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: Just wa

[gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: GWT 2.6 feature complete is Nov 4

Hi, I really like to see following issues reviewed. All of them have proposed patches. As for now, I have to implement workarounds in my projects. Elemental json works not properly in super dev mode: https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8306 MapFromStringTo.values() thr

[gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: GWT 2.6 feature complete is Nov 4

Hi, I really like to see following issues reviewed. All of them have proposed patches. As for now, I have to implement workarounds in my projects. Elemental json works not properly in super dev mode: https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8306 MapFromStringTo.values() thr

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Non-client apis and breaking changes

On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:53:46 PM UTC+2, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Thomas Broyer > > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:21:48 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: >>> >>> Just wandered by >>> https://gwt-review.**googlesource.com/#/c/1040/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: GWT 2.6 feature complete is Nov 4

I really would like to see some of these make the cut. Most of the which are trivial fixes, some have patches proposed. title set on parent TreeItem appears also on its children http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1393 HeaderPanel setHeaderWidget is broken http://cod

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Non-client apis and breaking changes

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:21:48 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: >> >> Just wandered by >> https://gwt-review.**googlesource.com/#/c/1040/and >> noticed that with this change, any downs

Re: [gwt-contrib] IE10 and historic dates

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Daniel Kurka wrote: > Hi all, > > IE10 does not handle dates the same way other browser do anymore. This > breaks a test in the EmulSuite. > > // IE10 (Standards mode) > >> new Date(Date.parse("3/31/2000")).toUTCString() > "Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:00:00 UTC" > > // IE

[gwt-contrib] Re: IE10 and historic dates

I think one should use a DateTimeFormat, and we should leave Date.parse() as a thin wrapper around the JS equivalent. We might have an opportunity to make things different when we'll emulate JSR 310 (from Java 8) On Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:34:22 PM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Hi all, >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Non-client apis and breaking changes

On Friday, October 18, 2013 7:21:48 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: > > Just wandered by https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/1040/ and > noticed that with this change, any downstream generator/linker using the > static helper methods in Name will no longer build across 2.5.1 to 2.6.0. > Wit

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issue with development mode plugin and Custom selection script / hosted.html that allows separate debugging of multiple GWT applications on a single page

Hi Jamie, I had the same problem. I implemented a very similar approach described by you. I introduced in a top level gwt.xml a property to enable the debuging which will be inherit by all my application. In your custom Linker you can access this property: for (SelectionProperty prop