Re: [gwt-contrib] The elusive J2CL

2018-03-09 Thread 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors
A basic functionality missing in open-source build doesn't mean it is far away. We were trying to get it ready by this quarter but it didn't work out as I explained earlier. For 'pure' J2CL experience, we have chosen bazel. Bazel works/scales pretty well and same as our internal setup which makes i

Re: [gwt-contrib] The elusive J2CL

2018-03-09 Thread Slava Pankov
Yes, I agree "even basic missing functionalities" sounds scary. And why bazel? It's not even close in popularity with Maven and Gradle. On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 1:52:34 AM UTC-8, Ivan Markov wrote: > > Goktug, sorry for being a but stubborn here, but we need a tad more > visibility: > > {quot

Re: [gwt-contrib] The elusive J2CL

2018-03-09 Thread Ivan Markov
Goktug, sorry for being a but stubborn here, but we need a tad more visibility: {quote} The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at least some output for your compilations. {quote} "even basic miss