Goktug, sorry for being a but stubborn here, but we need a tad more 
visibility:

{quote}
The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic 
missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at 
least some output for your compilations.
{quote}

"even basic missing functionalities" sounds quite worrysome. What is the 
ETA for implementing these and releasing a preview? If e.g. two months, 
fine. If we are talking Q4/2018 or 2019, then that's a different 
proposition altogether. I guess, not just for us. Please don't answer with 
the "it's done when it is done" slogan. :) That's one of the major pains 
for this community imo.

Final Q: are all the legal issues for releasing in the open resolved by 
now? From personal experience, these might take forever to resolve.

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 10:51:21 PM UTC+2, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> > There is still tone of work to do for a polished open source experience 
> but at least we can give access to more people who is really interested.
>
> What I meant here; is giving access *after* basic bazel stuff is finished 
> so there will be something to play with. We don't want to give access to 
> a broader group for something that is dead on arrival.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:31 AM Alberto Mancini <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hello, 
>> yes, definitely I would like to be in. 
>> I am really interested.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>    Alberto. 
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:21 PM Nándor Előd Fekete <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am *really* interested. Can you sign me up?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:13:01 AM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic 
>>>> missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at 
>>>> least some output for your compilations. That is blocked on missing 
>>>> functionalities in bazel. After that we can probably finished in more 
>>>> timely manner.
>>>> There is still tone of work to do for a polished open source experience 
>>>> but at least we can give access to more people who is really interested.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8de62b64-4bc8-4158-80d4-b15ef688f523%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8de62b64-4bc8-4158-80d4-b15ef688f523%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAGv30V%3DfWDpwQ45u9mPVuXY%3D62PJZ%2B9uxearZk5Lq_a0j2yjaA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAGv30V%3DfWDpwQ45u9mPVuXY%3D62PJZ%2B9uxearZk5Lq_a0j2yjaA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/067f44a4-2f87-49f1-9495-3e7a13f1f0ff%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to