RE: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology

We are preparing a more pragmatically oriented (lab departments and orderables) lab LOINC that is pruned to represent only those lab tests reported in our system. If we could get sets of LOINC codes actually reported from all GPC sites, we would be glad to create the union of the sets and then

Re: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology

WISC started with what simply came out of the raw EPIC system (lab components with LOINC when available). -TM On 11/13/2014 1:52 PM, Belay Demeke wrote: Hello All, Looking at the i2b2 Laboratory Test hierarchy construction, it appeared that many sites use different methodologies. For insta

RE: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology

Hi Belay, Just to clarify, MCRF is using the LOINC ontologies (Laboratory Measurements and Clinical Measurements) prepared by UNMC and posted to PCORI Central Desktop. I haven't sent an update for Babel recently, but plan to soon. Thanks, Laurel From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [mailto

Re: [gpc-informatics] #87: Deploy, document R Data Builder demo service

I was able to successfully install on a clean 1.7.03a VM. The new 1.7.04 VM did not work. On 1704, it looks like for some reason, it failed to add the line to the i2b2_loader.js file for the rdatabuilder plugin. Once I added it, it shows up in the client and I can run the plugin. And it¹s placin

GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology

Hello All, Looking at the i2b2 Laboratory Test hierarchy construction, it appeared that many sites use different methodologies. For instance, KUMC is built based on EMR, UMNC based on Regenstrief Institute's LOINC tree, UMN based on UMLS, and MCRF based on Harvard(LLB22/i2b2/SHRINE). Our g

Re: [gpc-informatics] #178: determine whether last.visit is the last fulfilled visit or the last scheduled visit

#178: determine whether last.visit is the last fulfilled visit or the last scheduled visit -+--- Reporter: mish | Owner: dconnolly Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: cohort-char1

Re: [gpc-informatics] #87: Deploy, document R Data Builder demo service

#87: Deploy, document R Data Builder demo service --+ Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: gkowalski Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: data-agg1 Component: data-sharing | Resolution:

data builder screenshare at 11am

same coordinates as usual... Meeting ID and access code: 686-845-717; call +1 (267) 507-0008 from SoftwareDev -- Dan ___ Gpc-de

RBUILDER DEMO

Is this still being done today? Best Regards, Susan Morrison Ph. (214)648-4293 UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. ___ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu

Lab Value Range Definition

Marshfield is reworking our Laboratory Measurements. Does GPC have definition around lab value ranges (High, Low, Normal)? Should we use our system defaults, accepting that it's possible there's some variation across sites? Thanks for the input. Laurel _

RE: [gpc-informatics] #33: data elements for obesity cohort characterization

Larry Given that the data standardization requirements from ONC are guiding our i2b2 information model design, we are now extracting CCDA complaint data sets from Epic for our i2b2 instance. When MU requires ALL structured data elements be coded in CCDA and it is universal in Care Everywhere, i

RE: [gpc-informatics] #178: determine whether last.visit is the last fulfilled visit or the last scheduled visit

Wendy KU has not deployed their encounter type variable yet to my knowledge and not all deployed data has been moved to Babel for many of our sites. KU will and must deploy encounter type to be compliant with PCORI and participate in GPC. So I am simply saying that all of our sites will have t