On 06/04/14 15:25, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
As already mentioned I was also a bit surprised by this. I'm not sure we are
really ready for something more than a tech-preview (and not a real
release), but maybe it could be the kick in the behind that we
One of topic note:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Hamish wrote:
> I wrote - and thought, sent - a long email about this some days ago, but
> yahoo or something seems to have eaten it as I don't see it in the list
> archive. frustrating as I already cleared my local copy!
This is unfortunate.
My 1 cent or less...
I think grass7 shold be the focus of the project now, the place where new
stuff should be developed, and that versions 6 are for bugfix only.
Why should I develop something new not in the latest software version?
All this thinking of a "good enough " version 7 (which I think
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Moritz Lennert
wrote:
> On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote:
>
>
>> As mentioned before, I wish to use the bulk of my grass dev time
>> maintaining the grass 6 line. To do that properly I need a staging
>> area, and devbr6 is it.
I don't see the need for a devbr6 becau
Martin Landa wrote
> 2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert
>
>> Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the
>> whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development
>> and bugfixes first go into grass6dev for a period of testing, before
>> _you_
2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
> Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the
> whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development
> and bugfixes first go into grass6dev for a period of testing, before _you_
> make the decision that so
Hi,
2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert :
> As already mentioned I was also a bit surprised by this. I'm not sure we are
> really ready for something more than a tech-preview (and not a real
> release), but maybe it could be the kick in the behind that we need to once
> and for all move over
On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote:
First of all, I believe this discussion belongs on the grass-dev list, not PSC.
See RFC1.
CC'in to dev-list
releasebranch70 should not have been branched until 7.0RC1. Until RC1
it is just wasted effort to keep the two of them as a 1:1 mirror, so
what's the
Hi,
I wrote - and thought, sent - a long email about this some days ago, but yahoo
or something seems to have eaten it as I don't see it in the list archive.
frustrating as I already cleared my local copy!
First of all, I believe this discussion belongs on the grass-dev list, not PSC.
See RFC
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 2014-03-31 9:57 GMT+02:00 Sören Gebbert :
>> +1
>> I agree to 100%
>
> big strong +1 for me, Martin
also from me: retire GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6).
markusN
___
grass-psc mailing li
Dear PSC members,
2014-04-06 10:08 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa :
>> +1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a
>> releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0.
>> The (my) objective is to stabilize any releasebranch.
>
> this should become a rule, see
Hi Markus,
2014-04-06 10:01 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz :
>> big strong +1 for me, Martin
>
> +1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a
> releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0.
> The (my) objective is to stabilize any releasebranch.
this should
Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 2014-03-31 9:57 GMT+02:00 Sören Gebbert :
>> +1
>> I agree to 100%
>
> big strong +1 for me, Martin
+1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a
releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes
Hi all,
2014-03-31 9:57 GMT+02:00 Sören Gebbert :
> +1
> I agree to 100%
big strong +1 for me, Martin
___
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
+1
I agree to 100%
Best regards
Soeren
Am 29.03.2014 22:18 schrieb "Helmut Kudrnovsky" :
> Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
>
>
> margherita wrote
> > Dear Luca,
> >
> > thank you for raising this issue,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi <
>
> > lucadeluge@
>
> > > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> w
+1
On 30 March 2014 02:47, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
>
>
> margherita wrote
> > Dear Luca,
> >
> > thank you for raising this issue,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi <
>
> > lucadeluge@
>
> > > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we
Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
margherita wrote
> Dear Luca,
>
> thank you for raising this issue,
>
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi <
> lucadeluge@
> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain
>> (releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7
17 matches
Mail list logo
